So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
3. in the spirit ] Cf. Rev 1:10, Rev 4:2, Rev 21:10.
into the wilderness ] In Isa 21:1 the situation of the ancient Babylon is apparently conceived as in a desert: and in fact Babylonia has been reduced to one, despite its unsurpassed natural fertility. It may be relevant to compare the present desolation of the once populous Campagna of Rome.
a scarlet coloured beast ] Undoubtedly the same as the Beast of Rev 13:1-8, though there his colour was not mentioned. It is symbolic (compare that of the dragon, Rev 12:3), as being the colour of blood: perhaps also suggestive of the imperial purple.
full of names of blasphemy ] So Rev 13:1, but here the blasphemies are even more all-pervading. The construction in the Greek, according to the best text, is irregular and peculiar, but cannot alter the sense.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
So he carried me away in the spirit – In vision. He seemed to himself to be thus carried away; or the scene which he is about to describe was made to pass before him as if he were present.
Into the wilderness – Into a desert. Compare the notes on Rev 12:6. Why this scene is laid in a wilderness or desert is not mentioned. Prof. Stuart supposes that it is because it is appropriate to symbolize the future condition of the beast. So DeWette and Rosenmuller. The imagery is changed somewhat from the first appearance of the harlot in Rev 17:1. There she is represented as sitting upon many waters. Now she is represented as riding on a beast, and of course the imagery is adapted to that. Possibly there may have been no intentional significancy in this; but on the supposition, as the interpretation has led us to believe all along, that this refers to papal Rome, may not the propriety of this be seen in the condition of Rome and the adjacent country, at the rise of the papal power? That had its rise (see the notes on Dan 7:25 ff) after the decline of the Roman civil power, and properly in the time of Clovis, Pepin, or Charlemagne. Perhaps its first visible appearance, as a power that was to influence the destiny of the world, was in the time of Gregory the Great, 590-605 a.d. On the supposition that the passage before us refers to the period when the papal power became thus marked and defined, the state of Rome at this time, as described by Mr. Gibbon, would show with what propriety the term wilderness or desert might be then applied to it.
The following extract from this author, in describing the state of Rome at the accession of Gregory the Great, has almost the appearance of being a designed commentary on this passage, or is, at anyrate, such as a partial interpreter of this book would desire and expect to find. Speaking of that period, he says (Decline and Fall, 3:207-211): Rome had reached, about the close of the sixth century, the lowest period of her depression. By the removal of the seat of empire, and the successive loss of the provinces, the sources of public and private opulence were exhausted; the lofty tree under whose shade the nations of the earth had reposed was deprived of its leaves and branches, and the sapless trunk was left to wither on the ground. The ministers of command and the messengers of victory no longer met on the Appian or Flaminian Way; and the hostile approach of the Lombards was often felt and continually feared. The inhabitants of a potent and peaceful capital, who visit without an anxious thought the garden of the adjacent country, will faintly picture in their fancy the distress of the Romans; they shut or opened their gates with a trembling hand, beheld from the walls the flames of their houses, and heard the lamentations of their brethren who were coupled together like dogs, and dragged away into distant slavery beyond the sea and the mountains.
Such incessant alarms must annihilate the pleasures, and interrupt the labors of a rural life; and the Campagna of Rome was speedily reduced to the stale of a dreary wilderness, in which the land is barren, the waters are impure, and the air is infectious. Curiosity and ambition no longer attracted the nations to the capital of the world; but if chance or necessity directed the steps of a wandering stranger, he contemplated with horror the vacancy and solitude of the city; and might be tempted to ask, Where is the Senate, and where are the people? In a season of excessive rains, the Tiber swelled above its banks, and rushed with irresistible violence into the valleys of the seven hills. A pestilential disease arose from the stagnation of the deluge, and so rapid was the contagion that fourscore persons expired in an hour in the midst of a solemn procession which implored the mercy of Heaven. A society in which marriage is encouraged, and industry prevails, soon repairs the accidental losses of pestilence and war; but as the far greater part of the Romans was condemned to hopeless indigence and celibacy, the depopulation was constant and visible, and the gloomy enthusiasts might expect the approaching failure of the human race. Yet the number of citizens still exceeded the measure of subsistence; their precarious food was supplied from the harvests of Sicily or Egypt; and the frequent repetition of famine betrays the inattention of the emperor to a distant province. The edifices of Rome were exposed to the same ruin and decay; the mouldering fabrics were easily overthrown by inundations, tempests, and earthquakes; and the monks who had occupied the most advantageous stations exulted in their base triumph over the ruins of antiquity.
Like Thebes, or Babylon, or Carthage, the name of Rome might have been erased from the earth, if the city had not been animated by a vital principle which again restored her to honor and dominion. The power as well as the virtue of the apostles resided with living energy in the breast of their successors; and the chair of Peter, under the reign of Maurice, was occupied by the first and greatest of the name of Gregory. The sword of the enemy was suspended over Rome; it was averted by the mild eloquence and seasonable gifts of the pontiff, who commanded the respect of heretics and barbarians. Compare Rev 13:3, Rev 13:12-15. On the supposition, now, that the inspired author of the Apocalypse had Rome, in that state when the civil power declined and the papacy arose, in his eye, what more expressive imagery could he have used to denote it than he has employed? On the supposition – if such a supposition could be made – that Mr. Gibbon meant to furnish a commentary on this passage, what more appropriate language could he have used? Does not this language look as if the author of the Apocalypse and the author of the Decline and Fall meant to play into each others hands?
And, in further confirmation of this, I may refer to the testimony of two Roman Catholic writers, giving the same view of Rome and showing that, in their apprehension also, it was only by the reviving influence of the papacy that Rome was saved from becoming a total waste. They are both of the middle ages. The first is Augustine Steuchus, who thus writes: The empire having been overthrown, unless God had raised up the pontificate, Rome, resuscitated and restored by none, would have become uninhabitable, and been a most foul habitation thenceforward of cattle. But in the pontificate it revived as with a second birth; its empire in magnitude not indeed equal to the old empire, but its form not very dissimilar: because all nations, from East and from West, venerate the pope, not otherwise than they before obeyed the emperor. The other is Flavio Blondas: The princes of the world now adore and worship as perpetual dictator the successor not of Caesar but of the fisherman Peter; that is, the supreme pontiff, the substitute of the aforesaid emperor. See the original in Elliott, 3:113.
And I saw a woman – Evidently the same which is referred to in Rev 17:1.
Sit upon a scarlet-coloured beast – That is, either the beast was itself naturally of this color, or it was covered with trappings of this color. The word scarlet properly denotes a bright red color – brighter than crimson, which is a red color tinged with blue. See the notes on Isa 1:18. The word used here – kokkinon – occurs in the New Testament only in the following places: Mat 27:28; Heb 9:19; Rev 17:3-4; Rev 18:12, Rev 18:16 – in all which places it is rendered scarlet. See the Mat 27:28 note and Heb 9:19 note. The color was obtained from a small insect which was found adhering to the shoots of a species of oak in Spain and Western Asia. This was the usual color in the robes of princes, military cloaks, etc. It is applicable in the description of papal Rome, because this is a favorite color there. Thus it is used in Rev 12:3, where the same power is represented under the image of a red dragon.
See the notes on that passage. It is remarkable that nothing would better represent the favorite color at Rome than this, or the actual appearance of the pope, the cardinals, and the priests in their robes, on some great festival occasion. Those who are familiar with the descriptions given of papal Rome by travelers, and those who have passed much time in Rome, will see at once the propriety of this description, on the supposition that it was intended to refer to the papacy. I caused this inquiry to be made of an intelligent gentleman who had passed much time in Rome – without his knowing my design what would strike a stranger on visiting Rome, or what would be likely particularly to arrest his attention as remarkable there; and he unhesitatingly replied, The scarlet color. This is the color of the dress of the cardinals – their hats, and cloaks, and stockings being always of this color.
It is the color of the carriages of the cardinals, the entire body of the carriage being scarlet, and the trappings of the horses the same. On occasion of public festivals and processions, scarlet is suspended from the windows of the houses along which processions pass. The inner color of the cloak of the pope is scarlet; his carriage is scarlet; the carpet on which he treads is scarlet. A large part of the dress of the body-guard of the pope is scarlet; and no one can take up a picture of Rome without seeing that this color is predominant. I looked through a volume of engravings representing the principal officers and public persons of Rome. There were few in which the scarlet color was not found as constituting some part of their apparel; in not a few the scarlet color prevailed almost entirely. And in illustration of the same thought, I introduce here an extract from a foreign newspaper, copied into an American newspaper of Feb. 22, 1851, as an illustration of the fact that the scarlet color is characteristic of Rome, and of the readiness with which it is referred to in that respect: Curious Costumes – The three new cardinals, the archbishops of Thoulouse, Rheims, and Besancon, were presented to the president of the French Republic by the Popes nuncio. They wore red caps, red stockings, black Roman coats lined and bound with red, and small cloaks. I conclude, therefore, that if it be admitted that it was intended to represent papal Rome in the vision, the precise description would have been adopted which is found here.
Full of names of blasphemy – All covered over with blasphemous titles and names. What could more accurately describe papal Rome than this? Compare for some of these names and titles the notes on 2Th 2:4; 1Ti 4:1-4; and notes on Rev 13:1, Rev 13:5.
Having seven heads and ten horns – See the notes on Rev 13:1.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 3. So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness] This wilderness into which the apostle was carried is the desolate state of the true Church of Christ, in one of the wings of the once mighty Roman empire. It was a truly awful sight, a terrible desert, a waste howling wilderness; for when he came hither he:-
Saw a woman sit upon a scarlet-coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.] No doubt can now be entertained that this woman is the Latin Church, for she sits upon the beast with seven heads and ten horns, which has been already proved to be the Latin empire, because this empire alone contains the number 666. See Clarke on Re 13:18. This is a representation of the Latin Church in her highest state of antichristian prosperity, for she SITS UPON the scarlet coloured beast, a striking emblem of her complete domination over the secular Latin empire. The state of the Latin Church from the commencement of the fourteenth century to the time of the Reformation may be considered that which corresponds to this prophetic description in the most literal and extensive sense of the words; for during this period she was at her highest pitch of worldly grandeur and temporal authority. The beast is full of names of blasphemy; and it is well known that the nations, in support of the Latin or Romish Church, have abounded in blasphemous appellations, and have not blushed to attribute to themselves and to their Church the most sacred titles, not only blaspheming by the improper use of sacred names, but even by applying to its bishop those names which alone belong to God; for God hath expressly declared that he will not give his glory to another, neither his praise to graven images.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
So he carried me away in the spirit; that is, being in an ecstasy; see Rev 4:2; whether in the body or out of the body he could not tell, as Paul expresseth it, 2Co 12:2.
Into the wilderness; a place not, or not much, inhabited, either as fittest for contemplation. or to signify that this great whore, which had driven the spouse of Christ into the wilderness, should shortly herself come into her state, according to the fate of old Babylon, Jer 1:13.
And I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast; the great whore, mentioned Rev 17:1, upheld by the Roman emperors.
Full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns; the same which is mentioned Rev 13:1;
See Poole on “Rev 13:1“. Here a great question ariseth, who this
woman is, or, (which is the same, as appeareth by Rev 17:5), what city is meant by Babylon, mentioned Rev 17:5; a question (as Mr. Pool noteth) of high concernment; for whoever this woman is, or whatsoever this Babylon signifieth, the people of God are upon pain of damnation admonished to avoid any communion with her, and to come out of her, Rev 14:9,10. Mr. Pool hath diligently collected into his Latin Synopsis all opinions about it, and showed what is to be said for or against them; I will give my reader the sum of what he saith.
1. Some would have it to be the whole world of wicked men. Against this it is said:
(1.) That John speaks here of a certain great city which reigneth over the kings of the earth, Rev 17:18; this cannot be meant of the wicked world.
(2.) The world of wicked men are those inhabitants of the earth, whom this woman made drunk with the wine of her fornication: now she that made them drunk, and those that were made drunk, cannot be the same.
(3.) This woman sitteth on seven mountains, Rev 17:9, and so do not all the wicked of the world.
(4.) We are commanded to come out of this Babylon, but we are not obliged to go out of the world.
2. Others would have this woman, or this Babylon, to be the old Chaldean Babylon. But:
(1.) Where then is the mystery, mentioned Rev 17:5?
(2.) The Babylon here mentioned, is by all agreed to be the seat of antichrist; so was that never.
3. The generality agree it to be Rome. Amongst the ancients, Tertullian, Jerome, Ambrose, CEcumenius, Augustine, Eusebius: of later writers, Beda, Aquinas, Salmeron, Pererius, Bellarmine, Lapide, Ribera, (all papists), besides a multitude of protestant writers.
(1.) That city is also like old Babylon for power and greatness, for oppression and tyranny of and over Gods Israel; besides, the city here mentioned is described by two characters, agreeing to none but Rome, Rev 17:9, dwelling upon seven hills.
(2.) Reigning over the kings of the earth: for the first Rome is the only city in the world founded upon seven hills, and famed for it by its old poets, Ovid, Virgil, Horace, Propertius, &c. It is attested to be so founded by Plutarch, Pliny, Dionysius, Halicarnassaeus. The names of these hills are known: Palatinus, Quirinalis, Aventinus, Celius, Veminalis, Esquilinus, Capitolinus. Both papist and protestant writers agree that here by Babylon Rome is meant; but they are divided, whether it be to be understood of Rome in its old pagan state, or in its present state, or in a state yet to come.
4. Some would have it to be Rome in its pagan state; of this mind are Grotius, and Dr. Hammond, and some others. But against this many things are said:
(1.) It is manifest that God here describes Rome not as under its sixth head, viz. the pagan emperors, but as it was under its last head, the eighth king, Rev 17:11, as it should ascend out of the bottomless pit, Rev 17:8.
(2.) What John saw herein mentioned as a secret about the blood of the saints, which he wondered at; now the pagan emperors spilling the blood of saints was a thing long since done.
(3.) The desolation of the Babylon here mentioned was to be final, never to be repaired, as appears by Rev 18:21-23; but pagan Rome was never made so desolate.
(4.) If Rome pagan be here meant, then, after its fall, Rome Christian was the habitation of devils, Rev 18:2.
(5.) Rome pagan fell upon our saints with downright blows, not with allurements, making them drunk with the wine of her fornication, as Rev 17:2.
5. The papists, who grant that by Babylon Rome is meant, would have it to be Rome toward the end of the world, when, they say, Rome shall apostatize from the pope to paganism again; but for this opinion there is no foundation in Scripture, nor the judgment of the ancients, and some of the papists themselves reject it as improbable and detestable.
6. The generality and best of protestant writers understand by Babylon, and by this woman, Rome, as it is at this day under the conduct of the pope, for which they give these reasons.
(1.) Because it cannot be understood of Rome in either of the other notions, as hath been proved.
(2.) Because antichrist is to sit in the temple of God, 2Th 2:4, as God, therefore not in any pagan city. The mystery of iniquity was working in the apostles time, but, Rev 17:7, the Roman empire hindered the appearance of antichrist till the popes had wrung Rome out of their hands, and were the sole rulers there; then antichrist showed himself.
(3.) Because there is nothing said of this great whore, or this Babylon, but admirably agreeth to Rome in its present state.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
3. the wildernessContrast herin Rev 12:6; Rev 12:14,having a place in the wilderness-world, but not a home; asojourner here, looking for the city to come. Now, on the contrary,she is contented to have her portion in this moral wilderness.
upon a scarlet . . .beastThe same as in Re 13:1,who there is described as here, “having seven heads and tenhorns (therein betraying that he is representative of the dragon, Re12:3), and upon his heads names (so the oldest manuscripts read)of blasphemy”; compare also Re17:12-14, below, with Rev 19:19;Rev 19:20; Rev 17:13;Rev 17:14; Rev 17:16.Rome, resting on the world power and ruling it by the claim ofsupremacy, is the chief, though not the exclusive, representative ofthis symbol. As the dragon is fiery-red, so the beast isblood-red in color; implying its blood-guiltiness, and alsodeep-dyed sin. The scarlet is also the symbol of kinglyauthority.
fullall over; notmerely “on his heads,” as in Re13:1, for its opposition to God is now about to develop itself inall its intensity. Under the harlot’s superintendence, the worldpower puts forth blasphemous pretensions worse than in pagan days. Sothe Pope is placed by the cardinals in God’s temple on the altarto sit there, and the cardinals kiss the feet of the Pope.This ceremony is called in Romish writers “the adoration.”[Historie de Clerge, Amsterd., 1716; and LETTENBURGH’SNotitia Curi Roman, 1683, p. 125; HEIDEGGER,Myst. Bab., 1, 511, 514, 537]; a papal coin [NumismataPontificum, Paris, 1679, p. 5] has the blasphemous legend,”Quem creant, adorant.” Kneeling and kissingare the worship meant by John’s word nine times used in respect tothe rival of God (Greek, “proskunein“).Abomination, too, is the scriptural term for an idol, or anycreature worshipped with the homage due to the Creator. Still, thereis some check on the God-opposed world power while ridden by theharlot; the consummated Antichrist will be when, having destroyedher, the beast shall be revealed as the concentration and incarnationof all the self-deifying God-opposed principles which have appearedin various forms and degrees heretofore. “The Church has gainedoutward recognition by leaning on the world power which in its turnuses the Church for its own objects; such is the picture here ofChristendom ripe for judgment” [AUBERLEN].The seven heads in the view of many are the seven successive forms ofgovernment of Rome: kings, consuls, dictators, decemvirs, militarytribunes, emperors, the German emperors [WORDSWORTH],of whom Napoleon is the successor (Re17:11). But see the view given, see on Re17:9, 10, which I prefer. The crowns formerly on the ten horns(Re 13:1) have now disappeared,perhaps an indication that the ten kingdoms into which theGermanic-Slavonic world [the old Roman empire, including theEast as well as the West, the two legs of the image with five toes oneach, that is, ten in all] is to be divided, will lose theirmonarchical form in the end [AUBERLEN];but see Re 17:12, which seemsto imply crowned kings.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
So he carried me away in the spirit,…. Not in body, as if he was removed from the isle of Patmos to some other place; but in a visionary way, just as Ezekiel was carried between earth and heaven, in the visions of God, to Jerusalem, Eze 8:3. It was represented to the mind of John, to his spirit, or soul, as if he had been taken up by the angel and carried through the air:
into the wilderness; by which may be meant either the wilderness of the people, the world, the church hereafter described, being a worldly one, and consisting of worldly men; or Gentilism, the Gentile world is often in the prophecies of the Old Testament called a wilderness; the Romish church having much of Heathen worship, and Heathen customs and practices in it, hence its votaries are called Gentiles, Re 11:2 or this circumstance may be mentioned, and the thing so represented to John, because that a wilderness is a solitary place, and fit for retirement and meditation; and where he might, without any interruption, take a full view of the following sight, and make proper observations upon it; and it is worth notice, that this is the place where the true church and became out of sight, in the room of which this apostate church appears: or, as others have thought, John is had into the wilderness, where the true church was hid and nourished, and the false one is there shown him, that seeing both together, he might compare them, and observe the difference between them; to all which may be added, that a wilderness is a fit place for such a beast as hereafter described to be seen in:
and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast; the beast is the same with that in Re 13:1 as the description shows, and is no other than the Roman empire as Papal; the “scarlet” colour is expressive of its imperial dignity, its power and authority, it received from the dragon; and also of this beast’s cruelty and tyranny, and of its shedding the blood of the saints: the woman sitting upon it is the great city of Rome, as is manifest from
Re 17:18 or the Romish antichrist, the apostate church of Rome, represented by a woman, as the true church is, Re 12:1 but in a very different form, and is the same with the second beast in Re 13:11 and the false prophet; and as the two beasts respect the same, under different considerations, namely, the Papacy, in its civil and ecclesiastic capacity, so this strange phenomenon, a woman sitting on such a beast, means one and the same thing as the horse and his rider in the seals, though in different views; the woman designs the Romish church, with the pope at the head of it, and the beast the Roman Papal empire as civil, by which the former is supported and upheld, bore up on high, and exalted in the manner it has been: moreover, as purple and scarlet are the colours of garments wore by the pope, and cardinals, hence the woman in the next verse is said to be “arrayed in purple and scarlet colour”, so even the very beasts on which they rode were covered with scarlet. Platina h says that Pope Paul the Second
“ordered by a public decree, on pain or punishment, that no man should wear a scarlet cap but cardinals; to whom also, in the first year of his popedom, he gave cloth of the same colour, to put upon their horses and mules when they rode; and besides, would have put into the decree, that the cardinals’ hats should be of scarlet silk:”
upon which Du Maulin i makes this remark;
“Pope Paul the Second was the first that gave scarlet to the cardinals, as well for themselves as for their mules, to the end that this prophecy, which agreeth in general with the see of Rome, might likewise appertain particularly to everyone of the pillars of the said see, which is to be set upon a “scarlet coloured beast”.”
It follows,
full of names of blasphemy: that is, the beast, or Roman Papal empire, was full of them; in Re 13:1 a name of blasphemy is said to be upon his head, and he to have a mouth speaking blasphemy; but here his whole body is represented as full of them, and may refer to the blasphemous doctrines of worshipping of images, of pardons and indulgences, of transubstantiation, c. and to the multitude of images, of the virgin Mary, and other saints, in the antichristian state, in every part of it and to those blaspheming persons, the cardinals, priests, and Jesuits, which abound in it; as well as to those blasphemous names and titles which are given to the pope, the head of it, or assumed by him; such as God on earth, the vicar of Christ, the head, and husband, and foundation of the church, with many others:
having seven heads, and ten horns: the seven heads are the seven mountains, on which the city of Rome, the metropolis of the empire, is seated; and the seven kings, or seven forms of government, under which it has been, as appears from Re 17:9,
[See comments on Re 13:1] and the “ten horns” signify the ten kings over the ten kingdoms, into which the empire was divided, when overrun by the Goths and Vandals; and which ten kings gave their kingdoms to the beast, the Romish antichrist; they gave their strength and power to him, being of his religion, and have been his horns, his defenders and supporters, ever since, as may be gathered from Re 17:12.
h De Vitis Pontiticum, p. 312. i Defence of the Catholic Faith, &c. c. 3. p. 38.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
He carried me away ( ). Second aorist active indicative of , to bear away, prophetic aorist. This verb is used of angels at death (Lu 16:22) or in an ecstasy (Re 21:10 and here).
In the Spirit ( ). Probably his own spirit, though the Holy Spirit is possible (Rev 1:10; Rev 4:2; Rev 21:10), without Paul’s uncertainty (2Co 12:2). Cf. Ezek 3:14; Ezek 8:3; Ezek 11:24.
Into a wilderness ( ). In Isa 21:1 there is (the vision of the deserted one, Babylon), and in Isa 14:23 Babylon is called . John may here picture this to be the fate of Rome or it may be that he himself, in the wilderness (desert) this side of Babylon, sees her fate. In 21:10 he sees the New Jerusalem from a high mountain.
Sitting (). Present middle participle of as in verse 1. “To manage and guide the beast” (Vincent).
Upon a scarlet-coloured beast ( ). Accusative with here, though genitive in verse 1. Late adjective (from , a parasite of the ilex coccifera), a crimson tint for splendour, in Rev 17:3; Rev 17:4; Rev 18:12; Rev 18:16; Matt 27:28; Heb 9:19.
Full of names of blasphemy ( ). See 13:1 for “names of blasphemy” on the seven heads of the beast, but here they cover the whole body of the beast (the first beast of Rev 13:1; Rev 19:20). The harlot city (Rome) sits astride this beast with seven heads and ten horns (Roman world power). The beast is here personified with masculine participles instead of neuter, like ( accusative singular, nominative singular, though some MSS. read ), construction according to sense in both instances. The verb always has the genitive after it in the Apocalypse (Rev 4:6; Rev 4:8; Rev 5:8; Rev 15:7; Rev 17:4; Rev 21:9) save here and apparently once in 17:4.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
sitting. To manage and guide the beast.
A scarlet – colored beast. The same as in ch. 13 1. This beast is ever after mentioned as to qhrion the beast. For scarlet, see on Mt 27:6.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “So he carried me away,” (kai apenegken me) “and he (one of the seven angels, Rev 17:1) carried me away,” to another scene to observe and recount further matters of judgment that were to fall upon the great whore religious harlot, and her offspring.
2) In the spirit into the wilderness, (eis eremon en pneumata) “in (the) spirit unto a desert,” wilderness or barren and uninhabited place, so that there were no side distractions. This is a claim of Divine illumination and inspiration by which John made known this revelation of judgment to come upon the harlot wife of Satan or the antichrist, as he later showed him the bride, the Lamb’s wife, Rev 21:9-10.
3) “And I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast,” (kai eidon gunaika kathemenen epi therion) “and I saw perceived, or recognized a woman (the whore) sitting upon a scarlet beast,” riding a morally, ethically, and religiously corrupt heathen, Gentile one-world government, that had merged the corruption of both the Babylonian and Roman Empires (the 1st and fourth) of the former Gentile one-world Empires.
4) “Full of names of blasphemy,” (gemonta onomata blasphemias) “being filled (full of) names of blasphemy; Even upon the head of the beast that arose out of the sea, Rev 13:1; and now this beast was “full of names of blasphemy,” the whole body support of the woman (whore) was covered with blasphemy, yet she unionized and fraternized it, Rev 13:5; Rev 16:9; Rev 16:11.
5) “Having seven heads and ten horns,” (echonta kephalas hepta kai kerata deka) “having, holding, or possessing seven heads and ten horns; The seven heads and ten horns of the beast order of Gentile heathen government simply indicates completeness of Gentile headship or jurisdiction of satellite heathen governments in disarray, under the one world beast or Gentile antichrist heathen ruler, who comes in his own name, and blasphemes and causes the whore to blaspheme or speak against the truth of God, Joh 5:43; Rev 17:9; Rev 17:12.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(3) So he carried. . . .Better, And he carried me away into a wilderness in spirit: and I saw a woman sitting upon a wild beast of scarlet colour, teeming with names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. We recognise the wild beast as that described in Revelation 13. Now the wild beast carries the woman; for she draws her support from the great world-power. The scene is the wilderness. The contrast between the desolation around her and the splendour of her appearance is striking and suggestive. The woman clothed with the sun (Rev. 12:1), persecuted by the dragon, finds a home in the wilderness into which she is driven. She is persecuted, but not forsaken; she can joy in tribulation. The scarlet-clad woman, amid all her dazzling surroundings, is still in a wilderness. The runagates continue in scarceness. Sansjoy is the brother of Sansloy. The wild beast is scarlet in colour. The dragon was red (Rev. 12:3); the woman is clothed in scarlet. Is it the emblem of lawlessness ending in violence? (Comp. Isa. 1:18). It has also a show of sovereignty.
Full of names.Teeming with names, &c.The living creatures (Rev. 4:8) teemed (the same word as here) with eyes, the tokens of ready obedience and true intelligence. The wild beast teems with tokens of lawlessness and self-sufficiency.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3. Carried me away From the visional Jerusalem temple, where were the throne, the living four, and the twenty-four elders. These are resumed again at Rev 18:1, as appears at Rev 19:4.
Into the wilderness Where she has been driven by the downfall and desolation of her capital, Babylon. That this wilderness, or desert, is a typical image of a condition of deprivation or desolation is indicated by the fact that the same Greek word, in verb form, is used in Rev 17:16 for desolate. Desolate now by the loss of her capital, the nations will yet make her both desolate and, richly arrayed though now she be, naked. Having lost the real organic power of despotism and persecution, she still can glorify herself in gorgeous apparel, pomps, and display, and make proud pretensions of infallibility and universal supremacy, but of even these costly attires the ten horns will finally strip her naked. Rev 17:16. Alford, however, maintains that Babylon herself was in a wilderness, and that this woman is that Babylon. He argues, that in the Septuagint the chapter of Isaiah (Isa 21:9) from which the clause “Babylon is fallen” is quoted, is headed “The vision of the wilderness.” But Babylon is not there said to be “in the wilderness,” but the wilderness or “desert” is the region whence the vision sweeps in upon the conception of the prophet. It is incongruous to say that a city which was an empire in itself was in a wilderness. But we have a close analogy much nearer at hand. The woman of chapter 12 was driven from her high place into the wilderness; and so this harlot is driven from her fallen home into a parallel wilderness. And what makes this certain is the following parallelism: seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying, Come hither; I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore. So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness. Rev 17:1; Rev 17:8.
the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will show thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife. And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain. Rev 21:9-10.
This remarkable and certainly intentional parallelism fully proves that as the bride is a pure Church so the harlot must be a corrupt Church. Pagan Rome was no Church at all.
Beast The seven heads and ten horns worn both by the dragon of 12 and 13 identify this as the Roman beast of the latter chapter. Scarlet is the colour of popes, and especially cardinals; and Newton says, “The mules and horses which carry the popes and cardinals are covered with scarlet cloth, so that they may be properly said to ride upon a scarlet-coloured beast.” Wordsworth says, quoting the historian Platina, “Paul II. made it penal for any one to wear hats of scarlet except cardinals; and he gave them scarlet trappings for their mules and horses.”
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.’
John is carried ‘in the Spirit’. Comparison with Rev 1:10 shows that this means that time is irrelevant. He is carried back and forward in time to see what he sees. He observes a prominent prostitute sitting on a scarlet coloured Beast, which is the ultimate Blasphemy. The colour of the beast suggests that this beast is closely related to the red monster of Rev 12:3, for he alone of beasts and monsters is described as red (possibly as the colour of blood because of his murderous intentions) Thus the woman is borne and supported by Satan’s beast himself who is at the back of what she propagates. This beast is full of the names of blasphemy and therefore transcends the one who had names of blasphemy only on his heads (Rev 13:1). There it referred to the claims of Roman emperors to divinity, but here it refers to all the blasphemies of the ages. This beast is far more sinister than the beast of Rome, which was merely a temporary copy of the scarlet beast.
‘Into a wilderness’. The prostitute is aping the people of God, and especially the woman of Rev 12:14, by false professions of piety. Seemingly like the woman in chapter 12 she is found in the wilderness. But that it is all a pretence comes out in the next verse. The very reason that the wilderness was seen as a place where men could meet God was because it was away from the great cities with their pernicious influence. But her very dress proclaims that influence.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Rev 17:3-6 . The view of the harlot promised John, Rev 17:1 sq., is afforded after the angel has carried him away in the spirit into the wilderness.
-g0- -g0- . Rev 21:10 . De Wette explains the idea from Luk 16:22 ; but the in this passage does not mention so much an actual abandonment of the body, [3806] as rather that this change of standpoint has been wrought to the ecstatic consciousness of the seer by an angel. [3807]
. The identification of this wilderness with that mentioned in Rev 12:6 ; Rev 12:14 , impossible in a formal respect, because of the omission of the art., coincides in Auberlen with the view that the harlot, ch. 17, is identical with the woman, ch. 12. [3808] Why the harlot, with all her ostentation, is beheld in a wilderness, the text itself indicates, Rev 17:16 : [3809] for complete desolation is impending over her. [3810] Incorrect, therefore, are the explanations of the wilderness by Beda: “The absence of divinity;” Coccej.: “That part of the world wherein, at John’s time, idolatry and persecution prevailed;” Bengel: “Europe, especially Italy.” Incorrect also Vitr.: “Deserted of nations;” yet Vitr. has felt that the seeming contradiction between Rev 17:1 ( . .) and Rev 17:3 , in the sense of the passage already compared by him, Isa 21:1 , with which he improperly combines Eze 20:35 ( ), is explained, of course, not by the allegorical exposition that the wilderness, like the waters, designates many nations, but so that the sitting on the waters, i.e., the dominion over the nations (Rev 17:15 ) does not exclude the impending devastation.
. That now, since the form of the harlot, i.e., of the metropolis, is so expressly distinguished from that of the beast, i e., of the empire, this beast appears in some features different from in ch. 13, in no way destroys the identity of both beasts, clearly designated by the similarity of the chief features. [3811] This identity is not definitely marked; it was just the partial change in form of manifestation that did not permit John to write ., but he reports his vision which revealed to him figures in a form such as in fact they had not yet appeared: He saw a woman seated upon a scarlet-colored beast. The designates not the color of a covering which is to be ascribed to the beast, [3812] but the color of the beast itself. It is, like the fiery-red color of the dragon whom the beast serves, [3813] a sign of the blood shed by it. [3814] The difference from the representation, Rev 13:2 , is, therefore, not a proof of an actual difference of beasts, because in both forms the same thing is brought to sight; only this passage points more definitely to the blood actually shed, while in Rev 13:2 , in the form of the O. T. types, the dreadful power of the fierce beast, as that of a monstrous beast of prey, was first symbolized.
. This also, as well as the succeeding description , . . ., agrees in essentials with Rev 13:1 ; not all of the heads of the beast, however, bear a name of blasphemy, but that the whole beast is covered with that name of blasphemy is what is now stated. The art. ., which has been omitted through a misunderstanding, [3815] refers back to Rev 13:1 . The accus. stands here with , for the same reason as possibly with ; [3816] yet this construction remains remarkable, since elsewhere in the Apoc. the gen. stands with . [3817]
The woman herself (Rev 17:4 ) appears “arrayed” ( . Rev 12:1 ) “in purple and scarlet-colored” garments. [3818] The first garment [3819] indicates royal sovereignty. Even the could in itself [3820] have this meaning; but it is, on the one hand, superfluous by two emblems to designate the same thing; on the other hand, from the reference to Rev 17:3 ( . .), another significant interpretation of the scarlet, i.e., blood-colored, garment of the woman, excellently agreeing with Rev 17:6 , results: both are indicated; viz., the royal dominion, [3821] and the being stained with the blood of the saints. [3822] Beda errs in a twofold way: “The purple of feigned dominion.”
. Further description of royal and most rich display. [3823] The . stands zeugmatically to . . and .
, . . . The precipitate allegoristics, which could find indicated in the words ., . . ., “the enticements of feigned truth,” [3824] results here in arbitrary explanations: The golden cup, with its abominable contents, [3825] is regarded as hypocrisy, [3826] “worldly happiness, the majesty of government,” [3827] “the body of words which are read in Scripture, but distorted by wicked interpretations,” [3828] “the system of papal doctrine,” “the cup of the mass.” [3829] The text allows us to think only that the harlot who renders all kings and nations drunk with the wine of her fornication [3830] has a cup in her hand which is golden , just as she herself is adorned with gold and precious jewellery, but is full “of abominations,” because the wine of her fornication is therein. With the accusat. . is construed [3831] in the same sense [3832] as the genitive . ; but this harshness, which is the more remarkable as the genitive limitation is given in a single word, can scarcely be explained by the fact [3833] that the threefold genit. . . was to be avoided. It appears, accordingly, more correct [3834] to regard the accusat. . parallel with the accusat. , . . . , and to make it depend upon the in such a way that the words ., . . . , themselves bring later an interpretation of the . . . .
More expressly still than the corresponding appearance does the name, which stands written on the forehead of the woman, [3835] designate her lewd, abominable nature. The name runs: , , . . . The name is not the first constituent of the proper name, [3836] but designates with a certain parenthetical independence, like a premised “ Nota bene ,” that the name now to be mentioned is meant spiritually, [3837] or in a manner accordant with revelation, not without the covering; that beneath the external brilliancy the secret nature, and, in spite of the secular dominion presented to the eyes, the unmistakable corruption of the woman, are asserted. [3838] Nevertheless, the word dare not be regarded precisely as an adjective attribute to [3839]
The mysterious proper name . . is expressly the same as has already designated in Rev 14:8 , Rev 16:9 , the chief city as the concrete representative of the entire empire. The further designation expresses appellatively, by another change of figure, essentially what was delineated in the manifestation itself (Rev 17:4 , . . . ), to which the significant name also is to correspond. As “the mother of harlots,” etc., this great Babylon has shown herself by the circumstance that she has made her daughters, i.e., the cities of the Gentiles, [3840] harlots, given them to drink of her own cup of abominations, and filled the whole world with her own abominations. [3841]
Finally, John beholds, Rev 17:6 , the woman in a condition to which the scarlet color of her garment, and of the beast whereon she sits, corresponds: “Drunken with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.” On the expression, cf. Plin., H. N. , xiv. 28: “Drunken with the blood of citizens, and thirsting the more for it;” [3842] on the subject itself, cf. Rev 16:6 , Rev 18:24 .
. . Cf. Rev 16:10 , Rev 8:11 .
. . Cf. Rev 2:13 . The martyrs of Jesus are not in kind distinguished from the saints; but the former designation brings into prominence the fact as to how this testimony of Jesus, which the saints have given, becomes the cause of their death. [3843]
, . . . The accus. with . , as Rev 16:9 . The ground of John’s great astonishment is in general the just-described sight of the woman ( ); but in how far must this sight have occasioned such great astonishment? The most forcible reason would be that named by Auberlen, if he had the right to recognize again in the harlot the degenerate woman of Rev 12:1 . This would, in fact, be something completely incomprehensible; but neither the angel (Rev 17:7 sqq.) attempts to explain this impossibility, neither does there exist anywhere else in the text an occasion for the egregious mistake of such a conception. Arbitrary, because not based upon Rev 17:7 sqq., are the explanations of Bengel: “John wondered, because so mighty a beast has to serve the woman in carrying her;” of Hengstenberg, who describes the astonishment of the seer as “unreasonable, foolish,” [3844] because the harlot, in spite of her dreadful guilt, still maintains her greatness; of Ebrard: because the beast appears to be entirely different from in ch. 13. The angel designates in Rev 17:7 , entirely in agreement with the , Rev 17:6 , the mystery of the woman, and the beast carrying her, as the cause, to be explained by interpretation, of the astonishment of John, who himself did not understand [3845] the [3846] thus beheld by him.
[3806] Cf. 2Co 12:2 .
[3807] Cf. Luk 4:1 sqq., Luk 10:8 sqq., Luk 11:1 , Luk 12:18 ; var. lect.
[3808] See on Rev 17:18 .
[3809] Cf. Rev 18:2 ; Rev 18:16 ; Rev 18:19 .
[3810] Andr., C. a Lap., Ewald, De Wette, Hofm., Hengstenb., etc.
[3811] Against Zll., Ebrard.
[3812] Zll., De Wette.
[3813] Rev 12:3 ; cf. Rev 6:4 .
[3814] Cf. Rev 16:6 , Rev 11:7 .
[3815] See Critical Notes.
[3816] Phi 1:11 ; Col 1:9 . Winer, p. 215.
[3817] Rev 17:4 ; Rev 4:8 ; Rev 15:7 .
[3818] Cf. Rev 18:16 .
[3819] Cf. Joh 19:2 .
[3820] Cf. Mat 27:28 .
[3821] Cf. Rev 17:18 .
[3822] Against Andr., Erasm., De Wette, Hengstenb., etc.
[3823] Cf. Eze 28:13 .
[3824] Beda.
[3825] . Cf. Lev 18:27 .
[3826] Beda.
[3827] C. a Lap.
[3828] Coccej.
[3829] Calov.
[3830] Rev 17:2 ; Rev 14:8 .
[3831] Ewald, De Wette, Bleek, Hengstenb., etc.
[3832] Cf. Rev 17:3 .
[3833] Hengstenb.
[3834] Cf. Rev 18:12 .
[3835] Cf. Rev 17:5 .
[3836] Vitr., etc.
[3837] Cf. Rev 11:8 .
[3838] Cf. C. a Lap., Beng., De Wette, Ewald, etc.
[3839] Cf. Hofm., O. S. , 644.
[3840] Rev 16:19 ; Ew.
[3841] Cf. Rev 13:3 sqq., 14 sqq., Rev 14:8 sqq., 11.
[3842] More illustrations in Wetst.
[3843] Cf. Rev 11:3 ; Rev 11:8 .
[3844] Cf. also on Rev 5:4 sqq.
[3845] Cf. De Wette.
[3846] Cf. Rev 15:1 .
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
(3) So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. (4) And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: (5) And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. (6) And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
Let the Reader recollect, that John beheld all this in vision, similar to Ezekiel, who, while he was at Chebar, his mind was led to Jerusalem, Eze 8:3 . So John was in Patmos, and he talks of being carried away in the spirit into the wilderness. All the characters here given of this woman, are descriptive of Rome and the Pope, and impossible to be applied to any other. The scarlet-colored beast, implies the regal power. The names full of blasphemy, are those by which the Pope is known. Such as his holiness, who is a sinner, the vicar of Christ, and the Head of the Church. His dress decked with gold, and precious stones and pearls. But more especially the names in his forehead. And if it be true, as is said that the Popes, until the time of Julius the Third, always wore the word mystery on their forehead, and that he dropped it, when he found this portion of the scripture was applied to him, and his wearing the word considered a confirmation of it, all these circumstances, are unanswerably decisive to whom they belong. And if to these be added, the hierarchy of cardinals, archbishops, monks, and abbots, their traffic in the sale of indulgencies, holy water, penance, and absolutions, and the nefarious trade, carried on under the color of religion, it should seem, that the title of mother of harlots, and abominations of the earth, cannot be withheld for a moment, either from the place of Rome, or the person of the Pope. And though John, it appears, was astonished at what he beheld, marvelling perhaps, that there should be such characters upon earth, and at the long – suffering and patience of God, in bearing with them; yet, such is the awful depravity of human nature, when void of God’s grace, that nothing of atrocity can be too bad, for the corrupt heart to follow. Reader, such views, shocking as they are, are yet profitable. Oh! how loudly do they preach to us, the blessed doctrine of distinguishing grace; and which is the sole cause, wherefore one man differs from another.
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Ver. 3. Into the wilderness ] Whither the true Church fled, Re. xii., of which they must be (saith one) that can learn to know the Romish Church to be a whore, condemned of God.
I saw a woman ] See Trapp on “ Rev 17:1 “
Sit upon ] Not going afoot, as Christ and the apostles did, but magnificently mounted, as the pope is ever, either upon a stately palfrey (emperors holding his stirrup) or upon men’s shoulders. England was once called the pope’s ass, for bearing his intolerable exactions. This ass he held by the ears instead of a bridle.
Upon a scarlet coloured beast ] The proper colour of the court of Rome; and it well serves to set forth their pomp and their hypocrisy. Innocent IV gave a red hat to his cardinals, to show them (as he said) that they should be ready to shed their blood for the truth. But that painter was nearer the point, who being blamed by a cardinal for colouring the visages of Peter and Paul too red, tartly replied, that he painted them so as blushing at the stateliness and sinfulness of his successors.
Full of names of blasphemy ] His head only before was busked with the blasphemy,Rev 13:1Rev 13:1 , now his whole body. Thus evil men and seducers grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived,2Ti 3:132Ti 3:13 .
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Rev 17:3 . The wilderness was the traditional site of visions, but there may be an allusion here to Isa 21:1 or even to the Roman Campagna (Erbes). The woman in 12. is in the desert to be delivered from the dragon; the woman here is in the desert to be destroyed by the Beast. “crimson or scarlet,” = luxurious and haughty splendour (Mart. ii. 39; Juv. Sat. iii. 283 and xiv. 188 for purple). The Beast which in Rev 13:1 bore the names of blasphemy upon its head, now wears them spread over all its body. Baldensperger (Rev 17:15-16 ) conjectures a similar reference to Rome in En. 52. ( seven hills?); here at any rate the author is sketching the Roman Empire in its general magnificence and authority under the Csars, and the inconsistencies in his description (waters and wilderness, seat on waters, seat on the Beast) are natural to this style of fantastic symbolism. It is curious that no attack is directed against the polytheism of the Empire. Cf. Cebes’ Tabula : “Do you see a woman sitting there with an inviting look, and in her hand a cup? She is called Deceit; by her power she beguiles all who enter life and makes them drink. And what is the draught? Deceit and ignorance.” The mounting of divine figures on corresponding beasts is a Babylonian trait ( S. C. 365).
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
So = And.
Spirit. App-101. See Rev 1:10.
the. No art., but this is often omitted after a preposition.
saw. App-133.
a woman. i.e. “that great city” of Rev 17:18.
sit = sitting; as supported by that being described in verses: Rev 17:8-11.
upon. App-104.
heads. These are the kings of Rev 17:10.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Rev 17:3. , wilderness) Europe, in particular Italy.- , a scarlet-coloured beast) as the dragon was red. The Roman Ceremon. teaches this. The text speaks respecting the time of the woman sitting on the beast.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
he carried: Rev 1:10, Rev 4:2, Rev 21:10, 1Ki 18:12, 2Ki 2:16, Eze 3:12, Eze 8:3, Eze 11:24, Act 8:39
into: Rev 12:6, Rev 12:14, Son 8:5
a woman: Rev 17:4, Rev 17:6, Rev 17:18, Rev 12:3
full: Rev 13:1-6, Dan 7:8, Dan 7:20, Dan 7:25, Dan 11:36, 2Th 2:4
having: Rev 17:9-12, Rev 12:3, Rev 13:1
Reciprocal: Pro 7:10 – the attire Isa 47:5 – for Eze 28:2 – I am Dan 7:24 – the ten Zec 6:2 – red Luk 2:27 – by Act 5:36 – boasting Rev 6:4 – horse Rev 19:20 – the beast
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Rev 17:3. Carried me away in the spirit is significant, and reminds us again of the truth that John never did leave the isle of Patmos literally while in the vision of this book. It was a part of the symbolical vision to be taken away into the wilderness and see the things that shall be described. The woman is the apostate church of Rome symbolized by the city of Rome because the church rested on the government of that city for support. The literal reason for using a beast in the symbol that was scarlet, was the fact that scarlet was one of the royal colors of the Empire. Seven heads and ten horns is explained at chapter 13:1, and it will appear in this chapter with a slight variation in the application.
Comments by Foy E. Wallace
Verse 3.
(2) The woman on the scarlet coloured beast–Rev 17:3-8.
“So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet-colored beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.”
The color of the beast was derived from the Red Dragon of the preceding chapters that instigated the persecutions. The crimson color was also the symbol of sin: “Though your sins be as scarlet . . . though they be red like crimson” Isa 1:18. The adaptation of the color red was significant in this symbol of a beast full of the sins of blasphemy. The word blasphemy originally denoted every kind of railing, reviling, irreverence, and insulting reproaches against God, or any other detraction; hence, this beast was full of names of blasphemy–any or all blasphemy against the church that could be named in connection with or reference to every known form of heathen idolatry.
The comments on the seven heads and ten horns which characterized the beast have been made in preceding chapters, this being the same beast, the Roman Empire and its tributaries, extended remarks here are unnecessary.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rev 17:3. And he carried me away in spirit into a wilderness. The expression he carried me away in spirit is found only here and at chap. Rev 21:10, where the vision of the New Jerusalem is introduced. It denotes spiritual ecstasy, not bodily removal; but it may be intended to do this in a peculiarly expressive form.In chap. Rev 12:6; Rev 12:14 we have been told of the wilderness into which the woman there mentioned fled. Here we have no article, and we cannot therefore suppose that the wilderness now mentioned is the same. Attention is fixed simply on the fact that, amidst all Babylons pomp and luxury, the place where she reigns is really desolate (1Ti 5:6). It has indeed been conjectured that the fate prepared for Babylon, and expressed by a peculiar word in Rev 17:16 and in chap. Rev 18:17; Rev 18:19, is already in the Seers mind, and that the thought of that fate leads to the description now given of the place of her abode. But it is more natural to think that these other expressions are conformed to that before us. The dwelling-place of Babylon is always ideally desolate: the fact shall afterwards correspond to the idea.A description of the beast upon which the harlot sat now follows. It is obviously that of chap. Rev 13:1-2, and this may be said to be admitted. The identity is established by the whole description, especially by the comparison of the two passages relating to the beast in chaps. 13 and 17 with that in which it is again mentioned in chap. Rev 19:19-20. In these latter verses the beast is spoken of as making war against Him that sat upon the horse, and as cast alive into the lake of fire with the false prophet that wrought the signs in his sight. But the first of these traits belongs to the beast of this chapter (Rev 17:14), and the second,its close connection with the false prophet,to the beast of chap. 13 (Rev 17:12-13). In all three passages, therefore, we have the same beast. On the other hand, the differences are slight. In chap. Rev 13:1 the names of blasphemy are upon the heads of the beast: here the whole body is covered with them. But the former statement does not exclude the latter, and the names upon the heads only are mentioned in the one place because it is of the heads that the Seer is speaking; be sees them coming up from the sea. Now he sees the whole beast. If, also, the article before the word names is to be read, it carries us to the thought of specific names already mentioned, and these can be no other than those of chap. Rev 13:1. Again the heads of this verse are naturally mentioned before the horns, whereas in chap. Rev 13:1 the order was reversed, because the horns appeared first as the beast ascended from the sea. Once more, the composite character of the beast of chap. Rev 13:2 may equally belong to this beast, while the colour of the beast here may equally belong to the beast there. It is the manner of the Apocalypse thus to fill out in one place the more imperfect description of the same object in another. At the same time it is not impossible that, while the beast itself is the same, some of the differences in the description may be intended to point out the effect of its alliance with the harlot. More especially may this be the case with regard to the greater extension of the names of blasphemy. How strikingly, if the harlot be the degenerate Church, would this indicate the greater and more confident rage against the saints to which the world is prompted when it finds, as it has so often found, the Church upon its side !
The attitude of the woman towards the beast, both in this verse and in Rev 17:7, ought to be marked. In the one she sits upon it; in the other it carries her: and the meaning is, not so much that her movements are facilitated by the beast, as that she is the beasts directress and guide. Without her it would simply spend itself in ungovernable and often misdirected fury. The harlot holds the reins, and with skilful hand guides the beast to the accomplishment of its aims.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Observe here, 1. That St. John was not in one continued ecstasy, but at several times in the spirit, that is, in an ecstasy or rapture of mind, wherein his outward senses being bound up, his understanding was fixed and raised up to the contemplation of divine objects, represented to him in the vision. A spiritual frame of mind is requisite for discerning the visions of God: He carried me away in the spirit.
Observe, 2. The place whither St. John was carried, and where he saw the following vision, namely, in the wilderness; He carried me away into the wilderness; a place of privacy, say some, where he might discern things undisturbedly and undistractedly. Solitude is fittest for contemplation. A wilderness, say others, was the fittest place to see that church in a vision, which was itself a wilderness; the apostolical church before was driven into the wilderness; here the apostate church follows her, as an harlot succeeding to a faithful city.
Observe, 3. The vision itself, I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet- coloured beast, &c. The woman here is the same with her that was called whore, Rev 17:1. namely, idolatrous Rome; she is represented as a woman richly and splendidly arrayed, with her wealth and riches, with her pomp and power, enticing the world to her idolatry, called so often whoredom and spiritual fornication; and the golden cup in her hand is an allusion to harlots, who with their philters, or enchanted cups, do allure and provoke men to sensual satisfaction; in like manner doth Rome by her outward splendour allure, and by other specious pretences and means draw persons to idolatries and superstitions.
Note lastly, The name written on her forehead, to wit, Mystery, Babylon the Great; that is, not literal, but mystical Babylon, the great city of Rome, the mother of idolatry, the pattern of cruelty, the patroness of all impiety; and propagating all these by her power and policies, who calls herself the mother church, but is indeed the mother of harlots, and of all manner of abominations; that is, of abominable doctrines and practices.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
The woman clothed with the sun was last seen ( Rev 12:1 ; Rev 12:6 ; Rev 12:14 ) in the wilderness. So, some have concluded this must be the apostate church portrayed as a whore riding on the beast in the wilderness. However, Old Testament writers use the wilderness to describe a place where God protects his people ( Psa 78:52 ; Isa 51:3 ; Eze 34:25-31 ) and a wasteland of punishment. ( Isa 50:2 ; Zep 2:13 ) The harlot may be the apostate church if the wilderness of chapter 12 is the same as the one here. The beast she rides upon seems to be the one of 13:1. Scarlet was the color of luxury and royalty. ( Mat 27:28-29 ) It is also the color used to describe the stain of sin. ( Isa 1:18 )
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
Rev 17:3. So he carried me away, &c. Namely, in the vision. As Ezekiel, while he was a captive in Chaldea, was conveyed by the Spirit to Jerusalem, (Eze 8:3,) so John is carried away in the Spirit into the wilderness; for there the scene is laid, being a scene of desolation. When the woman, the true church, was persecuted and afflicted, she was said (Rev 12:14) to flee into the wilderness: and, in like manner, when the woman, the false church, is to be destroyed, the vision is presented in the wilderness. For they are by no means, as some have imagined, the same woman, under various representations. They are totally distinct and different characters, and drawn in contrast to each other, as appears from their whole attire and behaviour, and particularly from these two circumstances, that during the one thousand two hundred and sixty years, while the woman is fed in the wilderness, the beast and the scarlet whore are reigning and triumphant, and, at the latter end, the whore is burned with fire, when the woman, as his wife, hath made herself ready for the marriage of the Lamb. And I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet- coloured beast The same which is described chap. 13., but he was there described as he carried on his own designs only; here he is connected with the whore. A woman sitting upon a beast is a lively and significative emblem of a church or city directing and governing an empire. In painting and sculpture, as well as in prophetic language, cities are often represented in the form of women: and Rome herself is exhibited, in ancient coins, as a woman sitting upon a lion. Here the beast is a scarlet-coloured beast, bearing the bloody livery, as well as the person of the woman, called so for the same reason that the dragon (Rev 12:3) was termed a red dragon, namely, to denote his cruelty, and in allusion to the distinguishing colour of the Roman emperors and magistrates. The beast is also full of names of blasphemy He had before a name of blasphemy upon his heads, (Rev 13:1,) now he has many: from the time of Hildebrand, the blasphemous titles of the Roman pontiff have been abundantly multiplied; having seven heads Which reach in a succession from his ascent out of the sea to his being cast into the lake of fire; and ten horns Which are contemporary with each other, and belong to his last period. So that this is the very same beast which was described in the former part of chap. 13: and the woman, in some measure, answers to the two-horned beast, or false prophet; and consequently the woman is not pagan, but Christian Rome; because Rome was become Christian before the beast had completely seven heads and ten horns; that is, before the Roman empire experienced its last form of government, and was divided into ten kingdoms.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Verse 3
A scarlet-colored beast. The description of this beast is very similar to that of the one mentioned Revelation 13:1-7. The seven heads here named are afterwards explained as the seven mountains on which the woman sitteth, (Revelation 17:9;) and the woman is, in Revelation 17:8, said to represent a great city. Now, as it has been one of the most characteristic distinctions of Rome, in all ages, that it was built upon seven hills, commentators have generally been agreed that Rome is intended by this symbol. Some, however, suppose that Pagan Rome, and others that Papal Rome, is meant. Protestant writers generally give it the latter interpretation.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
17:3 {3} So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a {b} scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
(3) Henceforth is propounded the type of Babylon, and the state of it, in four verses. After, a declaration of the type, in the rest of this chapter. In the type are described two things, the beast (of whom chapter thirteen speaks), in this verse and the woman that sits on the beast in Rev 17:4-6 . The beast in process of time has gotten somewhat more than was expressed in the former vision. First in that it is not read before that he was apparelled in scarlet, a robe imperial and of triumph. Secondly, in that this is full of names of blasphemy: the other carried the name of blasphemy only in his heads. So God teaches that this beast is much increased in impiety and injustice and does in this last age, triumph in both these more insolently and proudly then ever before.
(b) A scarlet colour, that is, with a red and purple garment: and surely it was not without cause the romish clergy were so much delighted with this colour.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
The vision of the system 17:3-6
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
The angel carried John away in the Spirit to a wilderness area (cf. Rev 1:10; Rev 4:1; Rev 21:10). This wilderness may refer to the desert near literal Babylon. [Note: Moffatt, 5:451; Robertson, 6:429.] Or it may anticipate the desolate condition of the harlot. [Note: Düsterdieck, p. 429; Lee, 4:737.] There he saw a woman, the harlot of Rev 17:1, sitting on a beast. Contrast the description of the rider on the white horse in Rev 19:8; Rev 19:11; Rev 19:14. The description of this animal is exactly the same as Antichrist in Rev 13:1 except that it is scarlet here, probably symbolizing luxury and splendor (cf. Rev 14:8-11; Isa 1:18; Mat 27:28-29). She sat in a position of control over Antichrist, and he supported her.