And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
3. I saw ] Should be omitted from the Greek text, but of course must be supplied in sense.
one of his heads ] Comparing Rev 17:10-11, it has been thought that this indicates the death of Nero, and his expected reappearance as Antichrist. See notes on ch. 17 and Introduction pp. 47, 49.
his deadly wound ] Lit., the stroke of his death.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And I saw one of his heads, as it were wounded to death – The phrase wounded to death means properly that it received a mortal wound, that is, the wound would have been mortal if it had not been healed. A blow was struck that would be naturally fatal, but there was something that prevented the fatal result. John does not say, however, by whom the wound was inflicted, nor does he describe further the nature of the wound. He says that one of the heads – that is, one of the seven heads – was thus wounded. In Rev 17:9, he says that the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sitteth. In Rev 17:10, he says, there are seven kings. And this would lead us to suppose that there were seven administrations, or forms of dominion, or dynasties, that were presented to the eye of John; and that while the number seven, as applied to the heads, so far identified the power as to fix its location on the seven hills Rev 17:9, in another respect also the number seven suggested forms of administration of dynasties, Rev 17:10. What is meant by saying that one of these heads was wounded to death has been among the most perplexing of all the inquiries pertaining to the Book of Revelation. The use of the word seven, and the explanation in Rev 17:9, make it morally certain that Rome, in some form of its administration, is referred to. Of this there can be no doubt, and in this all are agreed. It is not, however, the papal power as such that is here referred to; for:
(a)The papal power is designated under the image of the second beast;
(b)The descriptions pertaining to the first beast are all applicable to a secular power and,
(c)There was no form of the papal spiritual dominion which would properly correspond with what is said in Rev 17:10.
The reference in this place is, therefore, to Rome considered as a civil or secular power, yet Rome regarded as giving support to the second beast – the papal power. The general idea here is, that a state of things would exist in regard to that power, at the time referred to, as if one of the seven heads of the monster should receive a wound which would be fatal, if it were not healed in some way. That is, its power would be weakened; its dominion would be curtailed, and that portion of its power would have come to an end, if there had not been something which would, as it were, restore it, and save it from the wrath that was impending. The great point of difficulty relates to the particular application of this; to the facts in history that would correspond with the symbol.
On this there have been almost as many opinions as there have been interpreters of the Apocalypse, and there is no impropriety in saying that none of the solutions are wholly free from objection. The main difficulty, so far as the interpretation proposed above is concerned, is, in the fact that one of the seven heads is referred to as wounded unto death; as if one-seventh part of the power was endangered. I confess I am not able wholly to solve this difficulty; but, after all, is it certain that the meaning is that just one-seventh part of the power was in peril; that the blow affected just such a portion that it might be described as the one-seventh part? Is not the number seven so used in the Scriptures as to denote a considerable portion – a portion quite material and important? And may not all that is intended here be, that John saw a wound inflicted on that mighty power which would have been fatal if it had not been marvelously healed? And was it not true that the Roman civil and secular power was so waning and decaying, that it might properly be represented as if one of the seven heads of the monster had received a fatal wound, until its power was restored by the influence of the spiritual domination of the church of Rome? If this be the correct exposition, then what is implied here may be thus stated:
- The general subject of the representation is the Roman power, as seen at first in its vigor and strength;
(b)Then that power is said to be greatly weakened, as if one of its heads were smitten with a deadly wound;
(c)Then the wound was healed – this power was restored – by being brought into alliance with the papacy; that is, the whole Roman power over the world would have died away, if it had not been restored and perpetuated by means of this new and mighty influence, Rev 13:12.
Under this new form, Rome had all the power which it had ever had, and was guilty of all the atrocities of which it had ever been guilty: it was Rome still. Every wound that was inflicted on that power by the incursion of barbarians, and by the dividing off of parts of the empire, was healed by the papacy, and under this form its dominion became as wide and as formidable as under its ancient mode of administration. If a more particular application of this is sought for, I see no reason to doubt that it may be found in the quite common interpretation of the passage given by Protestants, that the reference is to the forms of administration under which this power appeared in the world. The number of distinct forms of government which the Roman power assumed from first to last was the following: kings, consuls, dictators, decemvirs, military tribunes, emperors. These seven forms of administration were, at least, sufficiently prominent and marked to be represented by this symbol, or to attract the attention of one contemplating this formidable power – for it was under these forms that its conquests had been achieved, and its dominion set up over the earth. In the time of John, and the time contemplated in this vision, all these had passed away but the imperial. That, too, was soon to be smitten with a deadly wound by the invasion of the Northern hordes; and that would have wholly and forever ceased if it had not been restored – the deadly wound being healed – by the influence of the papal power, giving Rome its former ascendency. See the notes at the close of Rev 13:15.
And his deadly wound was healed – That is, as explained above, the waning Roman secular power was restored by its connection with the spiritual power – the papacy. This was:
(a)A simple matter of fact, that the waning secular power of Rome was thus restored by connecting itself with the spiritual or ecclesiastical power, thus prolonging what might properly be called the Roman domination far beyond what it would otherwise have been; and,
(b)This would be properly represented by just the symbol employed here – the fatal wound inflicted on the head, and the healing of that wound, or preventing what would naturally be the effects. On the fulfillment of this, see the notes on Rev 13:15, at the close.
And all the world wondered after the beast – The word used here – thaumazo – means, properly, to be astonished; to be amazed; then to wonder at; then to admire and follow (Robinson, Lexicon). In Rev 13:4, it is said that the world worshipped the beast; and the general idea is, that the beast received such universal reverence, or inspired such universal awe, as to be properly called worship or adoration. There can be no doubt of the propriety of this, considered as applicable to that secular Roman power which sustained the papacy. The homage was as wide as the limits of the Roman empire had ever been, and might be said to embrace all the world.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 3. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death] This is the second and last place where the heads of the beast are mentioned with any description; and therefore the meaning here must be forms of government, as these were noticed last in the angel’s double explanation. The head that was wounded to death can be no other than the seventh draconic head, which was the sixth head of the beast, viz,, the imperial power; for “this head,” as Bishop Newton observes, “was, as it were, wounded to death when the Roman empire was overturned by the northern nations, and an end was put to the very name of emperor in Momyllus Augustulus.” It was so wounded that it was wholly improbable that it could ever rise again to considerable power, for the western empire came into the possession of several barbarous nations of independent interests.
And his deadly wound was healed] This was effected by Charlemagne, who with his successors assumed all the marks of the ancient emperors of the west, with the titles of Semper Augustus, Sacred Majesty, First Prince of the Christian World, Temporal Chief of the Christian People, and Rector or Temporal Chief of the Faithful in Germany; Mod. Universal History, vol. xxxii., p. 79. But it is said in Re 13:2 that the dragon gave the beast his power, , his armies or military strength; i.e., he employed all his imperial power in defense of the Latin empire, which supported the Latin Church. He also gave his seat, , literally his throne, to him: that is, his whole empire formed an integral part of the Latin empire, by its conversion to the Roman Catholic faith. He also gave him great authority. This is literally true of the Roman empire of Germany, which, by its great power and influence in the politics of Europe, extended the religion of the empire over the various states and monarchies of Europe, thus incorporating them as it were in one vast empire, by uniting them in one common faith.
And all the world wondered after the beast.] All the earth. As the original word signifies earth, and not world as in our translation, the Latin world, which is the earth of the beast, is here intended; and the meaning of the passage consequently is, that the whole body of the Roman Catholics were affected with great astonishment at the mighty sway of the Latin empire, considering it as a great and holy power.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
And I saw one of his heads; that is, the leopards head.
As it were wounded to death: the seven heads of this beast are interpreted by the Spirit of God himself, to be
seven kings, Rev 17:10, i.e. seven forms of sovereign government in the Roman state, and these successive one to another; for it is said there:
Five are fallen, and one is, and the other is yet to come: so that this head must be either that then in being, or that to come; it cannot be that to come, because that does not receive its fatal blow and deadly wound till the final dissolution of the Roman (as the fourth metal) monarchy; therefore it must be that head then in being, viz. that of the pagan emperors: and the wounding of this head to death, is the conquering the pagan emperors, and the abolishing of paganism and idolatry, and putting a stop to persecution by the Christian emperors;
and his deadly wound was healed; and consequently this wound was healed when idolatry (for substance the same with the heathenish, though in a new dress) and persecution was restored (gradually) by the doctrine and practice of the Romish Church.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
3. One ofliterally, “fromamong.”
wounded . . . healedtwiceagain repeated emphatically (Rev 13:12;Rev 13:14); compare Rev 17:8;Rev 17:11, “the beast thatwas, and is not, and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit”(compare Re 13:11); theGermanic empire, the seventh head (revived in the eighth), asyet future in John’s time (Re17:10). Contrast the change whereby Nebuchadnezzar, being humbledfrom his self-deifying pride, was converted from his beast-likeform and character to MAN’Sform and true position towards God; symbolized by his eagle wingsbeing plucked, and himself made to stand upon his feet as a man(Da 7:4). Here, on the contrary,the beast’s head is not changed into a human head, butreceives a deadly wound, that is, the world kingdom which this headrepresents does not truly turn to God, but for a time its God-opposedcharacter remains paralyzed (“as it were slain”; the verywords marking the beast’s outward resemblance to the Lamb, “asit were slain,” see on Re 5:6.Compare also the second beast’s resemblance to the Lamb, Re13:11). Though seemingly slain (Greek for”wounded”), it remains the beast still, to rise again inanother form (Re 13:11). Thefirst six heads were heathenish, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia,Greece, Rome; the new seventh world power (the pagan German hordespouring down on Christianized Rome), whereby Satan had hoped tostifle Christianity (Rev 11:15;Rev 11:16), became itselfChristianized (answering to the beast’s, as it were, deadly wound:it was slain, and it is not, Re17:11). Its ascent out of the bottomless pit answers tothe healing of its deadly wound (Re17:8). No essential change is noticed in Daniel as effected byChristianity upon the fourth kingdom; it remains essentiallyGod-opposed to the last. The beast, healed of its temporaryand external wound, now returns, not only from the sea, butfrom the bottomless pit, whence it draws new Antichristianstrength of hell (Rev 13:3;Rev 13:11; Rev 13:12;Rev 13:14; Rev 11:7;Rev 17:8). Compare the sevenevil spirits taken into the temporarily dispossessed, and thelast state worse than the first, Mt12:43-45. A new and worse heathenism breaks in upon theChristianized world, more devilish than the old one of the firstheads of the beast. The latter was an apostasy only from the generalrevelation of God in nature and conscience; but this new one is fromGod’s revelation of love in His Son. It culminates in Antichrist, theman of sin, the son of perdition (compare Re17:11); 2Th 2:3; compare 2Ti3:1-4, the very characteristics of old heathenism (Ro1:29-32) [AUBERLEN].More than one wound seems to me to be meant, for example, that underConstantine (when the pagan worship of the emperor’s image gave wayto Christianity), followed by the healing, when image worship and theother papal errors were introduced into the Church; again, that atthe Reformation, followed by the lethargic form of godlinesswithout the power, and about to end in the last great apostasy,which I identify with the second beast (Re13:11), Antichrist, the same seventh world power in another form.
wondered afterfollowedwith wondering gaze.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And I saw one of his heads,…. Not the Capitoline mountain, or the Capitol, the temple of Jupiter, built on that hill, which was burnt by lightning in the times of Titus, and magnificently rebuilt by Domitian, which was a thing past, and of no such moment as to be taken notice of here; nor anyone of the Roman emperors particularly, as Julius Caesar, at whose death the empire received a wound, upon its first erection in him, but was healed by the settlement of Augustus in it; nor Nero, at whose death the family of the Caesars ceased, when the empire was threatened with ruin in the following reigns, but was restored and reestablished in Vespasian, for these were before the times of John: but this is to be understood of the sixth head, or form of government, which obtained in the empire; namely, that of emperors, and of the destruction of Rome itself, the head of the empire, and which was built on seven mountains, designed by the seven heads of this beast: and this head was
as it were wounded to death; when the Roman empire was like a burning mountain cast into the sea; when Rome itself was taken, sacked, and burnt, more than once, particularly by Totilas; when Augustulus, the last of the emperors, was obliged to abdicate the throne; when Odoacer called himself, not emperor of Rome, but king of Italy, and retired from Rome to Ravenna; and when Adolphus, another Gothic king, thought to have changed the name of Rome, and given it that of Gothia: this seemed to be a deadly wound to Rome, to the empire and emperors.
And his deadly wound was healed; by the setting up of ten kingdoms in it, the kings of which gave them to the beast, to antichrist, the pope of Rome, and so the empire came to have an head again, a governor, though of another kind: some choose to understand this of the wound which antichrist received at the Reformation, by Luther, Calvin, and others, which has since been healing, Popery recovering itself again in some countries where it was driven out, and which, it is thought, will be entirely healed before his destruction:
and all the world wondered after the beast; which expresses the large extent of antichrist’s dominion, which reached to all the Roman empire, Lu 2:1; yea, to all kindreds, tongues, and nations,
Re 13:7; so that the universality the Papists boast of, as a note of the true church, is manifestly a mark of the beast, or of antichrist; and also the great esteem he is had in by his followers, who admire his power and authority, his grandeur, pomp, and riches, his signs and lying wonders, his pretended infallibility and holiness, his stock of merits and unwritten traditions, his skill to interpret Scripture, and his power to forgive sins, and the like: they went after him, obeyed him, embraced his doctrines, attended his religion and worship with wonder and amazement.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
And I saw (). No verb () in the old MSS., but clearly understood from verse 2.
As though it had been smitten ( ). Perfect passive participle of , as in 5:6, accusative singular agreeing with (one of the heads), object of understood, “as though slain” (so the word means in seven other instances in the book). There is a reference to the death and new life of the Lamb in 5:6.
And his death-stroke was healed ( ). First aorist passive indicative of . “The stroke of death” (that led to death). Apparently refers to the death of Nero in June 68 A.D. by his own hand. But after his death pretenders arose claiming to be Nero redivivus even as late as 89 (Tacitus, Hist. i. 78, ii. 8, etc.). John seems to regard Domitian as Nero over again in the persecutions carried on by him. The distinction is not always preserved between the beast (Roman Empire) and the seven heads (emperors), but in 17:10 the beast survives the loss of five heads. Here it is the death-stroke of one head, while in verses Rev 13:12; Rev 13:14 the beast himself receives a mortal wound.
Wondered after the beast ( ). First aorist passive (deponent) indicative of , to wonder at, to admire, as in 17:8. For this pregnant use of see John 12:9; Acts 5:37; Acts 20:30; 1Tim 5:15. “All the earth wondered at and followed after the beast,” that is Antichrist as represented by Domitian as Nero redivivus. But Charles champions the view that Caligula, not Nero, is the head that received the death-stroke and recovered and set up statues of himself for worship, even trying to do it in Jerusalem.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
I saw [] . Omitted in the best texts.
Wounded [] . Lit., slain. See on ch. Rev 5:6. The Rev. smitten is questionable. The word occurs eight times in Revelation, and in seven of these it must be rendered slain or slaughtered. Professor Milligan rightly observes that the statement is the counterpart of that in ver. 6, where we read of the lamb as though it had been slaughtered. In both cases there had been actual death, and in both revival. The one is a mocking counterpart of the other.
Deadly wound [ ] . Lit., stroke of death. Rev., death – stroke.
After the beast [ ] . A pregnant construction for wondered at and followed after.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And I saw one of his heads,” (kai mian ek ton kephalon autou) “And one of the heads of it (the beast),” I saw, one of the imperial rulers of the ancient one world Gentile government.
2) “As it were wounded to death,” (hos esphagmenen eis thanaton) “As it were having been slain to death; this head of the beast, wearing one of the ten reigning crowns, was put out of existence, Dan 7:8.
3) “And his deadly wound was healed,” (kai he plege tou thanaton autou etherapeuthe) “And the strokes of its death was healed; there was, as he beheld, or is to be, an healing, recovery of health to the one world Gentile empire, at the end of the church and Gentile age, empowered by the spirit of the dragon, the Devil, who gives life to the beast.
4) “And all the world wondered after the beast,” (kai ethaumasthe hole he ge opiso tou theriou) “And the whole earth (land) marveled after the beast,” that had arisen out of the sea and been given his power (dynamics) by the Dragon, that old serpent, the Devil. The world followed after him in admiration, to worship him, “the Dragon”, or it -the beast”, that embodies the passions of the Devil, Rev 12:9; Rev 12:17; Rev 13:1.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(3) And I saw . . .Translate, And (I saw) one from among his heads as if having been slain [the expression is the same as that applied to the Lamb in Rev. 5:6 : the wound marks are there when the vision rises] unto death; and the stroke of his death was healed. When the wild beast rose from the sea, the seer saw the deadly wound on the head: the wound was really unto death; the beast which had waged war against the true kingdom of righteousness and faith has received his death-blow. This is the historical point from which the vision starts. This being so, the death-blow is that which has just been dealt: the seed of the woman has bruised the serpents head. The blow which casts down the dragon inflicts a deadly wound upon the wild beast, which is his agent. When Christ overthrew the wicked one He gave the death-blow to the world-powerto all systems founded on passion, or self-sufficiency, or inhumanity. But the death-blow is apparently healed. What is this but telling the Church of Christ that the fruits of Christs victory will not be seen without delay? The world-power is smitten unto death; but the actual death does not follow immediately. The power of evil, contrary to all expectation, rises with new vigour. This revived power showed itself, with more or less force, in the way in which the spirit of the wild beast broke forth when Christianity seemed to have put fetters on the Roman empire.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
(3, 4) And all the world wondered . . .Literally, And the whole earth wondered after the wild beast, and worshipped the dragon, because he gave the authority and worshipped the wild beast, saying, Who is like unto the wild beast? and who is able to war with him? The healing of the death-blow causes wonder to all. Their wonder leads to worship. The spirit of the wild beast is adored wherever worldliness prevails. There is nothing so successful as success, and the homage of men is more often paid to power than to principle. Who is like unto the beast? The words are a parody, and a blasphemous parody, on the ascription of praise to God which the name Michael imported. (See Rev. 12:7; comp. Psalms 112, Mic. 7:18.) Who is like unto God? is the legend of the saints: the opposing cry is, Who is like unto the beast?
Can you not hear the words coming across the centuries from the lips of two Roman youths talking with each other, as they lounge together in the Forum? (Maurice.) Can we not hear the echo of the words in the Champs Elyses, in Piccadilly, in the Broadway, or Unter Den Linden, from the lips of young men who have taken fashion, rank, wealth, world-power in any shape, as their god?
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3. One of his heads as it were wounded The head was the Roman head. It was not wounded and healed, as some suppose, by ceasing to be pagan and becoming Christian under Constantine; for that event is symbolized by the downfall of the dragon. It was wounded, or rather slain, for so the word imports, by the cessation of the imperial Rome and its revival as papal Rome. The universal emperor expired, and revived in the universal bishop. To the secular empire there succeeded a spiritual empire of far greater extent and power. And that stupendous spiritual Roman empire exists to the present hour. And this cessation and renovation of the ruling power is essentially contemporaneous and identical with the death of ancient Rome under the blows of the northern barbarians, and the rise of the modern Rome and of the modern system of Europe. On the cessation of the old system a brief interregnum took place, upon which the rule fell into the hands of the Pope of Rome, in whom a new domination became impersonated.
Healed Compare with our notes, Rev 17:8-11, where the image of the wounded head, afterwards healed, becomes the death and resurrection of the beast. Stuart, and most rationalistic commentators, apply this to Nero. See our Introduction. Nero was driven from the throne and had committed suicide; but the baser rabble, with whom the bloody despot was popular, cherished the hope that he had escaped, was truly alive, and would yet reascend the throne. On this John is imagined by these commentators to have founded the image that one head of the beast received a deadly wound; that the wound was healed, that he shall “ascend out of the bottomless pit and go into perdition.” That is, the resurrection of the beast is to be identified with Nero’s escape and return. And they labor to misdate the writing of the apocalypse to suit this theory. But in point of fact, the idea of a resurrection from the dead by Nero formed no part of the popular notion even of the Roman rabble, at the time of the writing of the apocalypse. All that the historians of the day or the contemporaneous literature say is, that the fancy was current that Nero had escaped, would return, and would take a terrible revenge on Rome. It was not until a later generation, especially of Christians remembering Nero as the typical bloody persecutor, identified him with the antichrist, and found him in the apocalypse. Augustine first mentions the idea of his resurrection; and later still, Primasius is the first commentator who connects the idea of a resurrect Nero with the sacred texts.
Gebhardt, admitting this discordance between John’s conception of the beast’s resurrection and the Neronian rumour of a mere return, nevertheless maintains that John modifies the rumour to his own purposes. The modification, we reply, is much the largest part of the modified subject. And if the nucleus were a miserable falsity, the modification enlarges it to an enormity. We cheerfully admit that John does often take a nucleus of fact and modify it to his own needs. We may admit that chapter xii abounds in such modifications. But we call attention to the most decisive fact, that every nucleus John appropriates for such modification in his apocalypse is drawn from the sacred records. Hengstenberg has well shown, in discussing another point, that John never goes to classic or profane literature for any of his conceptions. He forcibly denies, on that ground, that the “palms” of chap. vii, where see our notes, are borrowed from pagan customs. All John’s imageries arise from within the sacred domain. Perfectly unendurable, then, is the thought that John goes to the slums of Rome and picks out from the very dregs of heathendom a base canard, overlays it with a wretched, lying superstition of his own, and brings it into the sublimest of all prophecies. We pity the moral taste of the critic who, on a full survey of the case, does not repel such a notion.
All the world wondered And to this day an all the world, larger than the then Roman world, and now embracing in full universality the ten horns, wonders after the beast in his papal development.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
3 . The proposed name must be not in the Saxon, Latin, or Hebrew language, but in the Greek. Says E.B. Elliott, (vol. iii, p. 205,) “There is the highest probability of the language and number of the word being Greek, and not Hebrew, because the apocalypse was intended for the use of the Gentiles, to whom Hebrew was scarcely known; because the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet are expressly selected by Christ in the apocalypse, and not those of the Hebrew, to express his eternity. ‘I am and , saith the Lord,’ (Rev 1:8,) because the numerals in which the enigma is expressed are Greek numerals, and because Irenaeus directly asserts, and all the other early fathers imply, by making their solutions in Greek, that that was understood by them to be the language intended by the Divine Spirit.” This again excludes Prof. Benary’s Hebrew Nero Cesar, the Hebrew, , Romanus; and such names as Luther, Calvin, and others, adduced, as retort, by the papists.
These principles, if valid, effectually exclude all the plausibly proposed names except the one furnished by Irenaeus, namely, Lateinos. And the distinctive name of the Romish communion is THE LATIN CHURCH. Says Dr. Henry Moore: “They Latinize every thing. Mass, prayers, hymns, litanies, canons, decretals, bulls, are conceived in Latin. The papal councils speak in Latin. Women themselves pray in Latin. The Scriptures are read in no other language than the Latin. In short all things are Latin.”
The most formidable rival, however, in spite of the several points of exclusion, is the Hebrew name, Nero Cesar. This name seems to have dawned upon the minds of four eminent scholars almost simultaneously, in 1836; namely, Fritzsche, in Rostock; Hitzig, in Zurich; Benary, in Berlin; and Reuss, in Strasburg. With a certain class of thinkers it seemed to carry all before it.
An almost conclusive proof of this name being the true solution, arose from a very peculiar coincidence. Irenaeus tells us that there were in the then extant manuscripts two different readings of the numbers; the older and more accurate was 666, but a later 616. Now there were also two forms of the name Nero, both used in Hebrew; one, after the Greek, was Neron, the other, after the Latin, was Nero, and the former of these made the 666, and the latter exactly 616! Should not that settle the question?
To this one might reply that Irenaeus tells us that the 616 was found only in later manuscripts, and so they could not have come from John. And how could copyists have adjusted their codices to Nero’s name, and Irenaeus never have heard of that name as a candidate? Indeed, Irenaeus’s omission of that name in discussing the candidates is a powerful argument against its claims.
But the French Professor Godet (in his Studies of the New Testament) denies that 666 is the true number of the Hebrew name Nero Cesar. Its true number is really 676, according to the spelling in St. John’s day. The number 666 is spelled with the three Hebrew consonants, K, S, R; the needed E of the first syllable being supplied by a vowel point; whereas the true orthography of the word Cesar, as identified by contemporary record, has four letters; requiring the E to be, not a vowel point, but a full letter, thereby increasing the number by a ten, making 676. This would entirely destroy the identification of the number with Nero. It is, indeed, given up by such rationalistic scholars as De Wette, Lucke, Bunsen, and Dusterdieck. We consider the Neronian solution of this name, like the Neronian date of the apocalypse, a very plausible, yet entirely preposterous, fable.
But there are some points of peculiar significance, both in the figures 666 and in the combination of the Greek letters that form the number, as they present themselves to the eye.
First, as to the significance of the 666. As seven is the perfect number, 7, 7, 7, thus trinally taken, would be the symbol of divine perfection, the Trinity. Three half sevens would be the reverse of perfection, the directly bad. Three sixes are an attempt to attain or display the divine perfection, but are a failure, a falling short, and that, perhaps, by a divinely-imposed limitation. And thus in this 666 is numerically figured the would-be Christ the antichrist.
And as to the combination of Greek letters that form the number 666, they are in John’s Greek text, , that is, chi, xi, and st. But, striking out the middle letter, the remaining two, , are the customary abbreviation in the manuscripts of the name Christ. Now let the serpentine crawl in between these two letters, and what have we in ? A central serpent wearing the externals of Christ; a serpent-Christ; an anti-Christ! Nor, says Godet, must this be promptly dismissed as a puerility. The Orientals were thus accustomed to express conceptions in figured forms to the eye, as even in our modern west we have the coat of arms, and in our America the “stars and stripes.” An ingenious, reflective people, before books are printed, are inclined to shape a momentous thought into an impressive mnemonic form. Thereby we get coin stamps, monograms, signet rings, abraxases, symbols pregnant with impressive import.
There is certainly presented here a curious combination of agreements.
They are a numerical name, Lateinos, that points to Rome; a trinal number, 666, that suggests the pseudo-divine; and a monogrammic triplet of letters, , that imports a Satanic Christ. It has taken centuries of thought to develop this combination, indicating that has, indeed, been exerted here in large amount. We leave the reader to decide whether the combination was really planned by the of John.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And I saw one of his heads which seemed as though it had been smitten unto death, and its death stroke was healed, and the whole earth wondered after the beast, and they worshipped the monster because he gave his authority to the beast, and they worshipped the beast saying, “Who is like the beast, and who is able to make war with him?”.’
The mention of one of the heads demonstrates that in this chapter it is the heads which are prominent. This smitten head probably refers to the illness that brought Caligula near to death, but from which he recovered seemingly miraculously. The ‘as though it had been smitten to death’ may be seeing his illness as caused by the ‘two-edged sword’ of the Son of Man (Rev 1:16).
Through his seemingly mortal illness Christ is seen as reminding Caligula of his mortality but he ignores the warning. The Eastern part of the Empire, which only saw the Emperors at a distance and took their divinity seriously (it was this part of the Empire e.g. Pergamum (Rev 2:13), which most enthusiastically enforced Emperor worship), may well have amplified rumours about this event which Caligula no doubt used to further belief in his divinity. This, or some other well known event, had clearly given impetus to such Imperial claims. As the rumours circulated they would no doubt grow in intensity. The purpose of John in stating it is to show that Rome is anti-Christ (setting itself up as a rival of Christ), claiming divinity and mimicking the death and resurrection of Christ.
When the religion of Rome was enforced, twofold worship was in view, the worship of the Emperor and the worship of Roma (Rome) itself, both demanding sacrifices and thus seen by Christians as devil worship (1Co 10:20-21). And thus it continued from emperor to emperor. The question about who could ‘compare with the beast’ echoes the view taken by the people of the Empire of the all-conquering legions, ‘who is like Rome?’. ‘Who is like the beast’ also contrasts with the meaning of the name of the Archangel Michael, ‘who is like God?’.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Rev 13:3 . . . With the accus., an express is, indeed, not placed, [3264] but its idea results [3265] from the connection, since the , Rev 13:1 , which is repeated besides in Rev 13:2 , continues to be effective.
. The stands just as in Rev 5:6 , only that in this passage the circumstance which explains how that one head bore the marks of an actual mortal wound, and yet could be represented like the rest in all the vigor of life, is expressly designated: . . . . .
The more significant that is, which is said in Rev 13:3 a. , and the more this special feature of the entire image of the beast from the sea is adapted thereto, in order to adjust and test the correct interpretation of the whole, the more certain, on the other hand, to become helpless here, is every exposition that misunderstands the image of the beast as a whole. Hengstenb., Ebrard, Auberlen, etc., who regard the an image of the world-power in general, infer from Rev 17:10 , with entire impropriety, that the head wounded unto death, and again healed, is the sixth , i.e., that whereby the Roman form of the world-power is symbolized. But although Hengstenb. further interprets that “by Christ’s atonement” a mortal wound is inflicted upon Roman worldly affairs and heathenism, a wound which, therefore, could appear as again healed, because the outward condition of the Roman Empire still continued, as John himself must have felt this ungodly power in his banishment to Patmos,
Ebrard and Auberlen prefer an interpretation expressly rejected by Hengstenb. They observe, that by the migration of nations the mortal wound was given the Roman Empire; but that this wound was healed, because a new “Roman Empire” had arisen, whose chief strength rests just in the Germanic nations. This Holy Roman Empire, however, appears as the sixth head of the beast, healed of its mortal wound, because its Christianity is secularized, ay, in all Christian appearance, often of a directly antichristian activity; viz., in the Papacy. But the Christian aspect of this form of the world-power is positively expressed in the fact that the head of the beast ( .) bears in itself a certain resemblance to the Lamb ( . , Rev 5:6 ). The mode of exposition thus reverts in essentials to the old Protestant; only that this was the more correct, so far as it did not acknowledge the vague significance of the of the world-power in the abstract, but understood it as a definite reference to Rome. Thus Calov., in dependence on Luther, explains “ ‘the beast wounded,’ most correctly, of the Roman Empire, harassed by the invasions of the barbarians, who for more than three centuries wounded, devastated, and held Rome, so that, during that whole time, there was no Western emperor. It was also healed by the medical aid of Charlemagne and Leo III.” Coccejus understood the head as the Grecian part of the Roman Empire: “In this part the beast received a fatal wound when Julian restored the worship of the gods.” The is interpreted: “Julian was removed, and Jovian, the Catholic, succeeded him.” Phil. Nicolai referred the wounding to the dominion of seven hundred years by the Moors in Spain; the healing, to the expulsion of the enemy by King Ferdinand. Most consistently Vitringa explains that the mortal wound is the humiliation of Pope Alexander 13 by the Emperor Frederick in the year 1160, and that the healing is the humiliation of the Emperor by the Pope in the year 1177: [3266] on the other hand, Bengel, with his far-reaching interpretation, [3267] stands already nearer the moderns, as Ebrard and Auberlen. But the former, as well as the latter, interpretation is rejected both by the connection of ch. 12 [3268] and by the particular points in Rev 13:1-2 The is just as certainly not the abstract world-power, as the seven heads are not particular “phases of the world-power,” but kings, and that, too, Roman kings. Besides this, the quid pro quo which is ascribed to the writer of the Apocalypse, by representing him as describing the Holy Roman Empire as the empire of heathen Rome which has been again revived, is compatible neither with historical truth nor with a sound conception of biblical prophecy. In both respects, it is impossible to regard an historical development, which is dependent upon the Christian element, and which in all its unchristian and antichristian deterioration yet remains in its entire course Christian, and has produced truly holy fruit, as a head of this beast of the dragon. The only indication in the text, which apparently supports such a misconception, Auberlen, etc., have found in the expression . , as, from the comparison of Rev 5:6 , they have inferred that thereby there is ascribed to the healed head a Christian, i.e., an apparently Christian, life and nature. But supposing, what does not necessarily lie in the expression, that a significant contrast were intended between the Lamb standing there as slain, and the head of the beast wounded, as it were, to death: is it, then, not much more correct to explain, as Victorin. already has done, [3269] viz., that the person represented by the head wounded and again healed is to be regarded as a pretended Christ in whom the sufferings and resurrection of the Lord appear to be imitated?
[3264] Against the false Rec.
[3265] Cf. Rev 4:4 .
[3266] As a new interpretation, Vitr. proposes. “The first five fallen (Rev 17:10 ) heads are five distinguished popes before the Reformation: Gregory VII., Alexander III., Innocent III., Boniface VIII., John XXII.; after the Reformation follow Paul III., Paul VIII., and finally the eighth, still future Pope, who shall put to death Christ’s witnesses” (Rev 11:7 ).
[3267] “You may see the paroxysms both of wounding and healing in the history of Gregory VII., Paschal II., Calist II., Alexander III., and others. Whatever adversity then happened is wounding; and whatever prosperity, healing.”
[3268] Auberlen has, indeed, found the migration of nations in Rev 12:15 sqq.
[3269] “This one, therefore, viz., Nero, being raised, God will send as a king worthy of the worthy, and a Messiah such as the Jews have merited.” Cf. Beda: “Antichrist, pertaining to the heads of the earthly kingdom, in imitation of our true Head, professes to have risen again, an though having been slain , and presents himself for men’s reception, instead of Christ, who truly did this.” In like manner, Zeger, C. a Lap., etc.
If we turn from such explanations as do not need a special refutation, [3270] that of Victorin. is first presented, which, being brought again to notice by Corrodi [3271] and Eichhorn, has been of late resolutely defended by Lcke, De Wette, Bleek, Baur, Volkmar, Hilgenf., E. Renan, etc [3272] The Roman historians of the report bruited shortly after Nero’s death, that he was still living, and would again appear, [3273] are quoted. This opinion, which was current especially in Asia, [3274] is recognized by the writer of the Apoc.; and two circumstances concur, which seem to greatly urge the explanation from that fancy of the enigmatical discourse concerning the head of the beast wounded to death, and again healed. On the one hand, it has penetrated Christian literature, viz., the Apocalyptic: [3275] on the other hand, it appears to give a definite explanation of Rev 17:8 , and the one best harmonizing with Rev 13:3 , viz., that Nero, slain by his own hand, appears returning from the abyss of hell, and working again as the living antichrist.
But against this mode of exposition it is to be remarked: (1) The writer of the Apocalypse in no way betrays such impurity and limitation of faith and Christian culture, that without injustice a superstition dare be ascribed to him which the Roman authors already had derided. [3276] In any case, if John subscribed to that illusion, nothing more could any longer be said concerning a truly prophetical character of the Apoc., dependent upon inspiration, and concerning its canonical authority. [3277] (2) In reference to Rev 17:8 , [3278] it must be mentioned already here, how difficult it is by the which is there described, to understand Nero alone, who is symbolized, just as in ch. 13, by one of the seven heads of the beast. (3) But it is also in the highest degree doubtful whether the Nero-myth were current already at the close of the first century, as they try to find it in John: on the contrary, unmistakable traces indicate that the original Nero-myth received the form in which it is now by an anachronism, regarded as utilized in the Apoc. only by combining with it misunderstood passages like Rev 13:3 ; Rev 17:8 , and 2Th 2:3 sqq. Sueton., Tacit., and Dio Chryst. by no means say that it was their opinion that the actually dead Nero had returned from the lower regions to life; but they report [3279] that it was not properly known in what way Nero had died, and that, therefore, [3280] the report originated that he was not at all dead, but had escaped to the Parthians, and would return to take vengeance on his enemies. So it stands in the sibylline books, where Nero appears as a fugitive, [3281] who is to return from the ends of the earth, his temporary place of refuge. [3282] That this Nero-myth was diffused among Christians by the authority of the sibylline books, is attested by Lactantius, who explains it not only as madness, but also indicates its natural origin: [3283] “Cast down, therefore, from the head of the government, and fallen from its summit, the impotent tyrant suddenly was nowhere present, so that a place not even of burial might appear on earth for so wicked a beast. Whence some madmen believe that he has been translated and reserved alive, the sibyl saying that the fugitive matricide shall come from the ends of the earth,” etc. Therefore Lactantius also knows nothing, as yet, of a resurrection and return of the dead Nero, but he has in view the faith of some madmen, supported by the sibylline books, that the still living Nero had found a refuge somewhere at the ends of the earth, whence he will return as a precursor of the antichrist. [3284] But this superstition, still diffused at his time, Lact. regards so senseless, because thereby a life a century long must be presupposed to Nero; while the entire fable could be explained without difficulty, from the fact that the grave of Nero was unknown, an explanation which is proved to be right, inasmuch as Nero was actually buried with the greatest silence. [3285] In Lactantius, therefore, the Nero-myth, designated as senseless, does not have the form in which they want to find it presented by the writer of the Apoc.
Augustine is the first to testify to the existence of the expectation that Nero would arise from the dead, and return as antichrist, since he expressly remarks that this form of the myth, by the side of the older, has resulted from an interpretation of 2Th 2:3 sqq. that is as bold as it is perverted: [3286] “Some think that this [3287] was said of the Roman Empire, as his declaration, ‘The mystery of iniquity doth already work,’ he wanted to be understood of Nero, whose deeds seemed as though of antichrist. Whence some suspect that he will rise again, and be the antichrist . But others think that he was not slain, but rather had withdrawn so as to be regarded slain, and was concealed alive in the vigor of the age, in which he was when he was believed to have died, until he would be revealed at his own time, and be restored to the government. But to me such presumption of those thinking these things is very wonderful.” In this connection, also, Augustine does not mention the Apoc. [3288] This is done by Sulp. Severus, [3289] who, however, does not combine the myth of the revivification of the dead Nero with Rev 13:3 , but under the presumption that Nero had actually committed suicide [3290] records the entirely peculiar turn to the matter: It is believed that the wound which Nero inflicted upon himself was healed, and that he still lives, and at the end of the world will return as antichrist. The complete form of the myth is given first by Victorin., who expressly says that the actually deceased Nero would be again raised by God, and be sent as the pseudo-Messiah for judgment upon the ungodly; but Victorin.’s own words [3291] betray the origin of the myth thus fashioned, in the same way as Augustine [3292] testifies to the origin of another application of the myth from 2Th 2 . It cannot, therefore, in any way be asserted upon an historical basis, that the writer of the Apocalypse, when he represents one of the heads of the beast as wounded to death and again healed, depends upon an idea current at his time, concerning the return of Nero raised from the dead, for such an idea does not belong as yet to his time, but it must be asserted that the writer of the Apoc. has himself fashioned this manner of expressing the Nero-myth. No one, however, has ventured this.
[3270] Grot. on .: “The Capitol was burned while the Vitellians and Flavians warred with one another.”
.: “For the same Vespasian restored the Capitol, who also restored the Roman Empire, and, indeed, with great pomp of idolatry.” Zllig, who in Rev 13:18 finds the name of Balaam: “Balaam, slain as anti-Moses, now has returned to life, with seven heads, as the anti-Messiah, as the one for whom he will now be regarded returned from death to life.”
[3271] Krit. Gesch. des Chiliasmus , Zr., vol. ii., p. 308 sqq.
[3272] Der Antichrist , Germ. ed., Leipz. and Paris, 1873, p. 278.
[3273] Tacit., Hist. , ii. Revelation 8 : “About the same time, Achaia and Asia were terrified by a false rumor, as though Nero were approaching, and a fluctuating rumor concerning his death, the majority, on this account, thinking and believing that he was alive.” Cf. Sueton., Nero , 100:57; Dio Chrys., Or. , xxi., ed. Reiske., T. I., p. 504.
[3274] So that a false Nero, who availed himself of this in a remarkable way, found a following among the Parthians. Sueton., l. c.; Tacit., Hist. , i. Revelation 2 : “War also with the Parthians, near at hand, was stirred up by the farce of the pretended Nero.”
[3275] Sibyll. Orac. , ed. Serv. Gall., L. VIII., p. 688: [“When the matricide fugitive returns from the opposite part of the earth”]. Cf. p. 716; L. V., p. 547; Sulp. Sev., Hist. , s., L. II., Opp. ed.; G. Hom., Lugd. Bat. , 1647, p. 373: “Certainly his body, viz., that of Nero, was slain; whence it is believed, that, although he pierced himself with the sword, yet that he was restored by the healing of his wound, as it is written of him: And the stroke of his death was healed, in order that he might be seut at the end of the world to exercise the mystery of iniquity.”
[3276] Dio Chryst., l. c.: , .
[3277] This statement is not based on a narrow-minded conception of the canon (Volkm.), but asserts the demands which justice and cautious piety make of exegetes. The Apoc., with respect to its other contents, stands so high that it is utterly impossible that it should advance any superstitious statement directly contradictory to the simplest Christian faith and thought (also against Weiss., p. 34). But if it be exegetically proved that this is nevertheless the case, it appears necessary to surrender the deutero-canonical authority of the book. But, in spite of all its dazzling appearance, the exegesis of Volkm., as well as of Ewald, etc., is on this point incorrect.
[3278] See on the passage.
[3279] Cf. especially Dio Chryst., l. c.: [“And thus they stood aloof from him, and urged the question in what way he had died; for this even now was not as yet manifest”].
[3280] Cf. Tacit., l. c.
[3281] , L. VIII., 13:71; ed. Friedlieb, , L. V., 13:364.
[3282] In the same sense also is the passage, L. V., 13:33, to be understood. , , where Gallaeus (“will utterly be destroyed”) and Friedlieb (“the pernicious vanishes away”) mistranslate the . It is said only that the pernicious one, i.e., Nero, will become invisible, viz., by flight, but will return. It is altogether a perversion when the sibylline expressions concerning the return of Nero are compared with the Apoc., in order to make a Nero redivivus acceptable here; for in the sibylline books the chief matter is lacking, as, e.g., Hilgenf. himself acknowledges ( Zeitschr. f. Wiss. Th. , 1871, p. 39. Cf. also, 1869, p. 421 sqq.).
[3283] De Mort. Persec. , c. 2.
[3284] “A precursor of the devil, and going before him as he comes to devastate the earth, and overthrow the human race.”
[3285] Eutrop., Hist. Rom. vii. Revelation 18 : “The remains of Nero, which were buried in a humble way.”
[3286] De Civ. D. , L. XX., c. 19, 3.
[3287] l. c., Rev 13:7 .
[3288] That Nero had sometimes been regarded the antichrist of Daniel, because of his persecution of the Christians (Jerome on Dan 11:28 : “Whence many of our writers think that because of the greatness of his cruelty and baseness, the Domitian Nero would be antichrist”), does not belong here.
[3289] l. c.
[3290] Etiamsi se gladis transfixit .
[3291] Nanc ergo caetera .
[3292] l. c.
Any other explanation of Rev 13:3 is therefore hardly possible, than that indicated already in the Introduction. [3293] By a combination with Rev 17:8-11 , the result is attained that the mortal wound cannot be referred to the sixth, [3294] but must be referred to the fifth, head of the beast. This is correctly acknowledged by Ewald, Lcke, De Wette, etc., as they are further right in accounting Nero as the last of the fallen kings. But to proceed from this to the interpretation of Rev 13:3 , advocated by Ewald, Lcke, etc., which is proved to be just as untenable, is not only not demanded by Rev 17:8-11 , but is prohibited, because it is not said there that the fifth fallen king, i.e., Nero, would return as the eighth, but that the future eighth would be the personified beast himself. But of this nothing whatever is said in ch. 13; it is not once to be perceived from ch. 13 that an eighth king is at all to be expected, so that this point (Rev 17:11 ) is not in any way to be introduced into Rev 13:3 . The healing of the mortal wound certainly cannot, therefore, refer to one of the heads of the beast (the fifth), as it is neither said in ch. 17, nor agrees with the statement in Rev 13:3 , that the fifth fallen (deceased) king will return as the eighth. On the contrary, the healing of the mortal wound on the fifth head of the beast must correspond to that which is stated in ch. 17, so that the beast is not, and yet is; viz., it is in so far as the sixth king is. The existence of the sixth king is the healing of the mortal wound on the fifth head, whose infliction caused the beast not to be, and whose healing again caused the beast, nevertheless, to be. Thus ch. 17 gives the riddle, and ch. Rev 13:3 the clew whereby the riddle is solved. The mortal wound is inflicted upon the (fifth) head of the beast, and the interregnum immediately succeeding. It is to be observed, that it is not at all said that the coroneted horn on the (fifth) head was stricken off, and grew again, this would attach the idea expressly to the person of Nero, and correspond with the opinion of Ewald, Lcke, De Wette, and Volkm., but that, in accordance with the distinction between the heads and the horns (cf. Rev 13:1 ), the idea of the Roman Empire, so far as it was under the Emperor Nero, is expressed [3295] This empire, designated by the fifth head of the beast, received a mortal wound when Nero, the bearer of the empire, and the last of the race of the Caesars which had founded the empire, committed suicide, and that, too, under the compulsion of the rebellion of a usurper (Galba), who, as little as his two successors (Otho, Vitellius), could in any way be regarded the restorer of the empire which was destroyed with Nero. The healing of that mortal wound did not ensue until Vespasian, the founder of a new dynasty, restored the empire, as its actual possessor, to its ancient strength and vitality. Thus, at the foundation of the prophetical enigmatical discourse of the writer of the Apoc. concerning the beast wounded to death and again restored, concerning the three coroneted horns which, nevertheless, do not stand upon particular heads (Rev 13:1 ), and concerning the beast which is not and yet is, there lies the same historical view which is declared by the Roman historians, in their representation of the threefold regency between the death of Nero and the accession of Vespasian, only as a sad interregnum. [3296]
[3293] p. 47 sq.
[3294] Hengstenb., Auberlen.
[3295] Volkm. urges that in Rev 13:3 , it is not said that the beast was wounded on its head, etc. But what in Rev 13:3 he is wrong in omitting, is correctly said in Rev 13:12 .
[3296] Sueton., l. c.; Dio Cass., Hist. Rom. , ed. J. Leuncl., Hannov., 1606, p. 7353.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
Rev 13:3
. The pregn. construction gives the view as to how the astonishment at the succession is occasioned. [3297] Beng. also shows how this expression is supported historically: in the crucifixion, e.g., this prophecy is fulfilled.
The amazement of the whole earth for thus far the dominion of the beast extends (Rev 13:2 ) may be referred especially to what is said in Rev 13:3 a ; for the worship of the dragon, as also of the beast equipped by him, that which results from Rev 13:2 b is expressly attached as the reason. But not only is the on the part of the inhabitants of the earth [3298] a robbery, which, in the service of the dragon and his beast, they perpetrate on the one true God, but even the phraseology in which they express their worship [3299] seems like a blasphemous parody of the praise with which the O. T. Church celebrated the incomparable glory of the living God. [3300] [See Note LXXI., p. 387.] And if the inhabitants of the earth declare further , . . ., back of this challenging and triumphing question lies concealed the desire that, in compliance with the purpose of the dragon, [3301] they might begin the conflict with those who do not worship the beast (cf. Rev 13:7 ).
[3297] Cf. Act 5:37 ; Act 20:30 . Grot., Zll., De Wette, etc.
[3298] Cf. Rev 13:8 ; Rev 3:10 .
[3299] Coccejus feels the difficulty of carrying out here his interpretation of the ; for, if the is the papacy, it appears objectionable to represent its adherents as worshippers of the dragon. But he says: “In word, it is true, they praised God and Christ, who had given such power to the Church; but in fact, because it was not the Church, but a beast, and the worldly power which he claimed for himself was power conceded by the dragon transforming himself into an angel of light, he whom they adored was the dragon.”
[3300] Cf. Isa 40:25 ; Isa 44:7 ; Isa 46:5 ; Psa 35:10 ; Psa 103:5 ; Mic 7:8 ; Coccej., Ewald.
[3301] Rev 12:17 .
NOTES BY THE AMERICAN EDITOR
LXXI. Rev 13:4 .
Gebhardt: “The seer observes what an imposing, overpowering, transporting impression the Roman Empire exercises upon men; how the world is astonished at it; that it is amazed by its greatness, power, and glory, and does homage to it; how the world worships the dragon, because he has given power to the beast, that is, not consciously worshipping the devil, but perceiving, in imperial power, and in its individual possessors, supposed manifestations of the divine, it really gives divine honors to the devil.” Carpenter: “The spirit of the wild beast is adored wherever worldliness prevails. There is nothing so successful as success, and the homage of men is more often paid to power than to principle. ‘Can you not hear the words coming across the centuries from the lips of two Roman youths, talking with each other as they lounge about the Forum?’ (Maurice.) Can we not hear the echo of the words in the Champs Elyses, in Piccadilly, in the Broadway, or Unter den Linden , from the lips of young men who have taken fashion, rank, wealth, world-power in any shape, as their god?”
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
Ver. 3. One of his heads as it were wounded ] Either by the invasion of the Goths; or by that fatal schism in the Church of Rome, A.D. 1378, when there sat three popes at once for 40 years together: or by the falling away of the Protestants from the Popedom, from the days of Wycliffe, John Huss, the Waldenses, Luther, to this present. Bellarmine bewails the business, that ever since we began to count and call the pope Antichrist, his kingdom hath greatly decreased. (Lib. iii. de Papa Rom. cap. 21.) And Cotton the Jesuit confesses, that the authority of the pope is incomparably less than it was; and that now the Christian Church is but adminutive.
And his deadly wound was healed ] By that false prophet,Rev 13:11Rev 13:11 , that is, by the Sorbonists, Jesuits, Trent fathers, and other Popish surgeons. The Jesuits give out that the devil sent out Luther, and God raised up them to resist him; but great is the truth, and will prevail, when all falsehood shall fall to the ground. It is but a palliate cure we here read of.
And all the world ] sc. Of Roman Catholics.
Wondered ] Or had wondered till the beast was wounded.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Rev 13:3 . The prophet sees in the empire an extraordinary vitality which adds to its fascination. Disasters which would suffice to ruin an ordinary state, leave Rome as strong as ever, thanks to her marvellous recuperative power. The allusion is not to the murder of Csar (so e.g. , Bruston, Gunkel, Porter), nor to the illness of Caligula (Spitta), but (so Dsterdieck, O. Holtzmann, B. Weiss, etc.) to the terrible convulsions which in 69 A.D. shook the empire to its foundations (Tac. Hist. i. 11). Nero’s death, with the bloody interregnum after it, was a wound to the State, from which it only recovered under Vespasian. It fulfilled the tradition of the wounded head (Dan 8:8 ). Song of Son 4 Esd. 12:18 (where the same crisis is noted) “post tempus regni illius [ i.e. , Nero’s] nascentur contentiones non modicae et periclitabitur ut cadat et non cadet tunc, sed iterum constituetur in suum initium”; also Suet. Vesp. 1 and Joseph. Bell . iv. 11, 5, Rev 7:4 ; Rev 7:2 (Rome unexpectedly rescued from ruin by Vespasian’s accession). The vitality of the pagan empire, shown in this power of righting itself after the revolution, only added to its prestige. The infatuation of loyalty, expressing itself in the worship of the emperor as the personal embodiment of the empire, grew worse and worse. A comparison of 3 a with 12 (cf. Rev 13:18 ) shows, however, a further allusion, viz. , to the Nero redivivus belief ( cf. Introd. 5). This is not developed until 17, but already the beast is evidently identified in a sense with one of its heads, who is a travesty (3 a = Rev 5:6 ) of the Lamb, i.e. , an antichrist. The context would certainly read quite naturally without 3 a , but it is implied in 12 (and 18), and none of the numerous attempts to analyse the chapter into source and revision is of any weight, in view of the general style and characteristics. These indicate the author’s own hand. Even the translation-hypothesis ( e.g. , Bruston, Gunkel) leads to arbitrary handling. See Introd. 6.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
I saw. Texts omit.
one of = one
wounded = slain. Same word in Rev 6:6.
deadly wound = death-stroke.
wound. Greek. plege. See Rev 9:20.
healed. Greek. therapeuo. Only here, and Rev 13:12, in Rev.
world. App-129.
after. Read, “(and followed) after”.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Rev 13:3. ) Thus all the most ancient remains: two or three copies insert .[144] I agree with Wolf, that , when you destroy , does not refer to the verb , which immediately precedes it. although there appears to be a gloss, as noticed in the Apparatus, which refers to it. But if is to be understood, it ought to be repeated from Rev 13:1, just as Pliny uses the verb of seeing by Hyperbaton, H. N. Book VIII. c. 6: Italy first saw elephants in the war with king Pyrrhus, and called them Lucanian oxen; but (it saw them) at Rome[145] in a triumph, etc. But the connection of the discourse is equally good, , …: comp. Rev 13:14 : and the Latin translator, whereas long ago he did not read I saw, seems thus to have construed the passage: and I saw a beast having seven heads-and (having) one of HIS [SUIS, not ejus] heads as it were slain to death. There is here, Rev 13:1-3, that mixture of cases, which we have seen more than once, and shall see somewhat below: and the connection is easy between the seven heads and one of the heads. One head is mentioned for the first: for , one, even without the article, means the first, ch. Rev 6:1, twice; Eze 32:1, especially in the LXX., etc. The accusative , which, as we lately noticed, depends by Hyperbaton on , Rev 13:1, most closely connects together the ascent of the beast out of the sea and the wound. Wherefore also he says, , not , as , in the preterite, ch. Rev 9:1. The first head of the beast is the Pope in the Lateran, on the Clian Mount, from Gregory VII. to Innocent III., or beyond him. During that space of time many adversities befel the Pope, through his contention with the Emperor; but he recovered from all.- -, as it were slain [wounded to death]-was healed) You may see paroxysms both of the wound and of the healing in the history of Gregory VII., Paschal II., Calixtus II., Alexander III., and others. Whatever adversity then happened, belongs to the wound: whatever prosperity, belongs to the healing.- , and all the earth wondered after the beast) that is, went after the beast with admiration. An abbreviated expression, as Act 15:23, writing and sending by their hands. All followed the beast with their feet, or eyes, or inclination; for instance, in the Crusades.
[144] ABCh Vulg. (Amiat.) Iren. omit . Rec. Text inserts it, with no very old authority except Fuld. MS. of Vulg. (inferior to Amiat.)-E.
[145] Rom autem (scil. vidit), etc.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
wounded to death
Fragments of the ancient Roman empire have never ceased to exist as separate kingdoms. It was the imperial form of government which ceased; the one head wounded to death. What we have prophetically in Rev 13:3 is the restoration of the imperial form as such, though over a federated empire of ten kingdoms; the “head” is “healed,” i.e. restored; there is an emperor again–the Beast.
world
ge = earth. Joh 7:7, (See Scofield “Rev 13:8”).
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes
one: Rev 13:1, Rev 13:2, Rev 13:14, Rev 17:10
wounded: Gr. slain
and his: Eze 30:24
all: Rev 17:6, Rev 17:8, Rev 17:13, Rev 17:17, Luk 2:1, Joh 12:19, Act 8:10, Act 8:11, Act 8:13, 2Th 2:9-12
Reciprocal: Job 34:30 – General Psa 37:7 – the man Psa 49:18 – praise Pro 17:4 – General Dan 3:7 – all the people Dan 8:24 – but Mat 12:44 – he findeth Luk 6:26 – when Luk 9:54 – fire Act 4:19 – to hearken Act 19:27 – whom 2Ti 2:16 – for Rev 12:3 – seven heads Rev 13:8 – all Rev 13:12 – causeth Rev 14:9 – If Rev 16:14 – the whole
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Rev 13:3. There is much uncertainly among the commentators that I have consulted concerning the interpretation of this verse. The question is raised whether it means one of the ten horns, or that some part of the city was weakened, or that some one of the prominent emperors is meant. With such a state of variation among the able historians and commentators, I will offer only what I am sure will at least not conflict with the facts of history. In some way the government of Rome received a stroke that threatened to be fatal, until something was done that closed the breach and the threatened disaster was avoided. It must have been rather unusual for all the world wondered at the recovery from the wound.
Comments by Foy E. Wallace
Verse 3.
(2) The wounded head of the beast–Rev 13:3-4.
1. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast–13:3. The wound inflicted was not in one of the horns of the beast, which represented the satellite kingdoms, but in one of the heads–in the seat of the empire itself. This wound, which was nearly a death stroke to the empire, appears to be the result of the help the earth gave to the woman in the civil wars which had threatened the power of the empire, and which resulted in temporary victory for the woman, the church. But it was not for long.
The wound was healed by the power of the emperor conquering the rebellions and bringing to an end the civil wars, and the power of the empire was augmented to such an extent that all the world wondered after the beast–the whole Roman world marvelled at the universal power of the empire.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rev 13:3. And I saw one of his heads as though it had been slain unto death; and his death-stroke was healed. The rendering alike in the Authorised and Revised Versions of the Greek word which we have translated slain (in the one wounded, in the other smitten) is peculiarly unfortunate and objectionable. The word occurs eight times in the Apocalypse. In seven of these it must be translated slain, or slaughtered, or killed. How can it be otherwise translated here? The statement in the verse is the counterpart of that in chap. Rev 5:6, where we read of the Lamb as though it had been slaughtered. In both cases there had been actual death, although in both there had also been a revival, a resurrection, to life. The one is a mocking counterpart of the other. The Seer does not tell us to which of the seven heads he specially refers, but a comparison of the words now used by him with those of chap. Rev 17:8-11 seems clearly to show that the sixth head, or the Roman power, was in his eye.
The language before us, it will be observed, is thus utterly inconsistent with the idea entertained by so many in modern times, that the sixth head, instead of being the Roman power in general, is the Emperor Nero himself, regarding whom the rumour is said to have prevailed, that after his death he would return to life and revive all the horrors of his former reign. It is extremely doubtful whether such a rumour was in existence at the time when the Apostle wrote. The thought would seem rather to have arisen long afterwards, when the misinterpretation of this passage gave it birth. Even Renan admits that the general opinion was that the monster (Nero), healed by a Satanic power, kept himself concealed somewhere and would return (LAntechrist, p. 350). The form which the belief assumed was not that Nero had died, but that he had hidden himself in the wilds of Parthia, from which he would come again to strike terror into the world. This being the case, there are at least two important points on which the statement of the passage before us is directly at variance with that rumour. In the first place, the head of the beast spoken of had not simply disappeared from view: it had been actually slain. A death-stroke had been inflicted. It had died as really as the Lamb of God had died on Calvary, and the Seer saw that it had done so. The words as though before it had been slain no more imply that there had not been a real death than they imply this in chap. Rev 5:6, where they are used of the slain Lamb. In the second place, this head was not to revive at some future day. It had already revived, and its death-stroke had been already healed. In order, therefore, to make the story of Neros disappearance and reappearance constitute the foundation of the passage before us, it is necessary to suppose that the prevalent rumour was that that monster of iniquity had both died and risen from the dead; and neither particular was embraced by it. What is spoken of is the world-power in the form of its sixth head. That power received a mortal stroke by the work of Christ. The world was then ideally and really overcome. It revived, and resumed its working.
And the whole earth wondered after the beast. The words the whole earth cannot be understood to mean only the Roman people. They must be allowed their full force, and thus they afford a further proof that in the beast we have a representative of the general world-power. See a fuller discussion of the Nero hypothesis in note on Rev 13:18.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Here St. John farther declares what he saw concerning this beast; namely, 1. That one of its heads was wounded; by which head many understand the fall of the ancient imperial power, the decay of its wonted glory, and that ample jurisdiction which Rome heretofore had under the Pagan emperors: and by the wounding of this head, they understand the abolishing of Paganism and idolatry, and putting a stop to persecution, by the Christian emperors.
2. It is asserted, That his deadly wound was healed; namely, when idolatry, the same for substance with the Pagan and old Heathenish idolatry, but in a new dress, was gradually restored by the Papal powers.
3. Here is the effect of this healing, all the earth wondered after the beast, that followed him in blind devotion.
Where, 1. Observe, Who the admirers of the beast are, the earth, the men of the world: no wonder to see them seduced!
2. This admiration is general, the whole earth wondered after the beast; how false is it then, that multitude is a note of the true church! Behold the several instances of the world’s wondering after the beast at Rome; they receive their doctrine and worship from him, they make all their appeals to him, all church officers receive their ordination from him, and are installed by him.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
At the close of chapter 12, Satan had turned from trying to destroy the church and to the persecution of its individual members. Roman persecution was intense under Nero and went dormant for a time after his death. It was then revived and intensified under Domitian. It may be this is a picture of those events. Some suggest Jesus’ death, resurrection and ascension to this throne stunned Rome until the church had time to gain strength. Coffman suggests the death of the Roman Empire came in 476 A. D. and it was revived and worshiped by the world in the form of the Roman Catholic church. There are almost as many theories as there are commentators. Suffice it to say, Satan’s allies look all the more invisible because they can live through a death stroke.
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
Verse 3
Wondered after the beast; worshipped and honored him.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
13:3 {8} And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
(8) This is the other place that pertains to the description of the beast of Rome: that besides that natural dignity, and breadth of the Roman Empire, which was eluded to in the two former verses, there was added this also as miraculous, that one head was wounded as it were to death, and was healed again as from heaven, in the sight of all men. This head was Nero the Emperor, in whom the race of the Caesars fell from imperial dignity, and the government of the commonwealth was translated to others: in whose hands the Empire was so cured and recovered to health, as he seemed to all so much the more deeply rooted and grounded fast, than ever before. Hence follows those effects, which are next spoken of: First an admiration of certain power, as it were, sacred and divine, sustaining the Empire and governing it: Secondly, the obedience and submission of the whole earth, in this verse: Thirdly, the adoration of the dragon, and most wicked worshipping of devils confirmed by the Roman Emperors: Lastly, the adoration of the beast himself, who grew into so great estimation, as that both the name and worship of a God was given to him, Rev 13:4 . Now there were two causes which brought in the minds of men this religion: the show of excellency, which brings with it reverence: and the show of power invincible, which brings fear. Who is like (say they) to the beast? Who shall be able to fight with him?
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Since the beast’s heads represent nations (Rev 13:1), Rev 13:3 seems to be saying that one of the nations under Satan’s authority perished, but then it revived. Another possibility is that the beast himself died and then experienced resurrection. [Note: Gregory H. Harris, "The Wound of the Beast in the Tribulation," Bibliotheca Sacra 156:624 (October-December 1999):459-68; et al.]