And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go [and] take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.
8. spake unto me again ] The true reading is scarcely grammatical, but must mean “[I heard] again speaking unto me.”
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And the voice which I heard from heaven – Rev 10:4. This is not the voice of the angel, but a direct divine command,
Said, Go and take the little book which is open, … – That is, take it out of his hand, and do with it as you shall be commanded. There is a very strong resemblance between this passage and the account contained in Eze 2:9-10; Eze 3:1-3. Ezekiel was directed to go to the house of Israel and deliver a divine message, whether they would hear or forbear; and in order that he might understand what message to deliver, there was shown to him a roll of a book, written within and without. That roll he was commanded to eat, and he found it to be in his mouth as honey for sweetness. John has added to this the circumstance that, though sweet in the mouth, it made the belly bitter. The additional command Rev 10:11, that he must yet prophecy before many people, leads us to suppose that he had the narrative in Ezekiel in his eye; for, as the result of his eating the roll, he was commanded to go and prophesy to the people of Israel. The passage here Rev 10:8 introduces a new symbol, that of eating the book, and evidently refers to something that was to occur before the mystery should be finished; that is, before the seventh trumpet should sound.
Which is open in the hand … On the symbolical meaning of the word open, as applied to the book, see the notes on Rev 10:2.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rev 10:8-11
Go and take the little book.
The making of a minister
(with Eze 2:8-10; Eze 3:1-3):–The symbolical scene in the case of Ezekiel was enacted over again in the case of John; only with such surroundings of majesty and magnificence as were but befitting after Johns humiliated but glorified Master had sat down on His throne in heaven. Now, in the first place, we see in that fine symbolical scene Gods own immediate way of making a minister–a book. A book plays a great part in the salvation of men. A book is brought down from heaven to earth–a book written in heaven lies open in the hand of the heavenly messenger, and the salvation of many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings lies wrapped up in that little book. Go thou, said the voice from heaven to John, Go thou and take the book. Now that is being both said and done every day among ourselves. There is the Book, and there are the people, and there somewhere among the people is the man chosen of God to take the Book, and to make the Book his own, and then to carry it to the people; Go, the Spirit of God says to that man, Go, leave all other occupations and all other pursuits; give thyself, body and soul, day and night, and all the days of thy life, to that Book. Take the book and eat it, said the angel to the seer. You will observe that the angel did not say, Take the book and read it. Had it been any other book but the Book it was, to read it himself and to have it written out and sent to all the Churches would have been enough. But that was not enough for this Book. Interpret the Bible like any other book, it is the fashion of our day to say, and in some senses that is an excellent enough rule; but that was not the angels rule that day to John, All other books in Johns day were to be read, but this Book was to be eaten. Yes, eaten. Clearly, then, this is not an ordinary Book. Clearly this is like no other book. Job said: Neither have I gone back from the commandment of His lips. I have esteemed the words of His mouth more than my necessary food. Eat, then, this same meal; eat it both minister and people; and eat it for your first food every morning. It will do for you what no earthly food, the best and the most necessary, can do; see that all its strength and all its sweetness fills your heart before you eat any other meat; read Gods Book, and have it next your heart to defend yourself against the influences of men that attempt to overthrow you. Enough of that; bring me my Bible, his widow told me one of my old elders used to say, as they read to him the morning newspaper; enough of that; bring me my Bible. The Word of God was more to that saint than all else, and his widow and I rejoice to tell the story after he has gone home to his rest. The Word of God was more to him than that which is to some of you your necessary food. But what does this mean–this extraordinary thing, It was in my mouth sweet as honey, but as soon as I had eaten it my belly was bitter? The best way, the only way indeed to find out all that means is to eat the same roll ourselves, and then to observe what passes within ourselves. Religion is an experimental science. Just you eat the Book now before you as Ezekiel and John ate it, and then tell us what takes place with you. I will tell you what will take place. The Word of God will be bitter in your mouth every morning, bitter with memories of yesterday and yester-night. Yes, the grace of God, and the abiding and abounding mercy of God, they are in His blessed Word always passing sweet to a penitent sinner. Ah, the truth is that the power, and the holiness, and the heavenly beauty of Gods Word is the daily and the sweet experience of all those who make the Word of God their earliest and their most necessary food. But after this, when this sweet Book descends into what David calls our inward parts; when the holy, and the just, and the good Word of God enters our guilty conscience and our corrupt heart, then there is bitterness indeed; for a sense of sin, as we so lightly speak, is then awakened in the soul, and with that new sense comes a new bitterness, compared with which the waters of Marah are milk and honey. Son of man, eat that thou findest, says Jehovah to Ezekiel in the vision. Take it, and eat it up, said the angel in like manner to John. Neither the prophet nor the apostle was asked or allowed to pick and choose, as we say. They were not to eat the sweet, and spit out the bitter. They were not to keep rolling the sweet morsels under their tongue, and to keep their inward parts strangers to their inward share of the Divine Book. I know this Scripture will not be sweet to all who hear it; but if it is at first bitter it must not be cast out. We must allow ourselves to read and preach and hear the whole Word of God. Son of man, eat that thou findest; and again, Take the roll and eat it up. It is a fine study to take up the Old Testament, and to trace all through it how prophet follows prophet, and psalmist follows psalmist, each several prophet and psalmist taking home to himself all that the prophets and the psalmist had said and sung before him; and then, having made the Book their own by reading it, by praying ever it, by singing it, by eating it, as the figure is, then when their own call came they prophesied prophecies, and sang psalms, new psalms, new prophecies as the peoples need was–never contenting themselves with just countersigning and repeating what any former prophet had said, what any former psalmist had sung, however great and however good in his time that prophet and psalmist had been. (A. Whyte, D. D.)
Gods Word
The little book may be taken to illustrate Gods redemptive truth, or the gospel.
I. The gospel is brought to man from heaven. The was in which alienated humanity can be brought into a loving sympathy with God transcends human discovery. Divine messengers brought this little book to man, and Christ embodied it.
II. This gospel is to be appropriated by man. Eat it up. The spirit of this little book must become the inspiring and the regnant spirit of our being.
III. This gospel has a twofold effect on man. Sweet in its disclosures of infinite love and promises of future blessedness; bitter in its convictions of sin, reproofs, and denunciations. It produces in the soul sorrow and joy, sighs and songs; and its bitterness will remain as long as one particle of depravity continues in the heart.
IV. This gospel, appropriated, qualifies man for his mission (verse 11). (D. Thomas, D. D.)
Take it, and eat it up.
On eating books
There are many different kinds of books in the world.
I. There are some which have nothing in them. They are not directly harmful, but neither are they of much good. When you have read them you can scarcely remember anything that they contained. They are very much like a kind of pastry which we call trifle. The moment you put it into your mouth it vanishes into thin air. Beware of books which only please you for the moment, and do nothing that would make you better or wiser.
II. There are other books which are stupefying. They dull the senses. They are like what we call opiates, which make men feel heavy and stupid. Be careful never to read books which merely please by soothing and dulling the senses.
III. There are other books which are unduly exciting. I do not object to a reasonable amount of interest. Every book worth the reading must in one sense excite us; but I am not now speaking of books which excite you by the amount of true knowledge which they give, or noble enthusiasm which they impart, but those which excite you by the feverish curiosity with which they fire you. I earnestly warn you against every book which makes it more difficult for you to do your every-day duty.
IV. There are other books which are very hard to digest, I have no doubt some of you think, for instance, that books on arithmetic or English grammar are very indigestible; but if you take a little at a time, and masticate that well before you take more, you will find that even hard books will agree with you wonderfully, and that you will be stronger and better for having taken them. Children suffer from indigestion, in learning difficult tasks, by taking too much at a time. The great secret of success is to take a little often, and to see that you learn well every little lesson, and thus make it your own, before you take more.
V. There are other books which are decidedly poisonous. Take care that you do not eat them. These books speak well of sin, and kindly of evil. Beware of any book that does not agree with the Bible in its estimate of good and of evil.
VI. And now I want to tell you of this one Book–The Bible–Of which you need never grow weary. (D. Davies.)
The proper use of Divine truth
Divine truth is not something for intellectual speculation, it is not something for memory, but diet for the life. It must be transmuted into the moral blood, and sent through the heart into every fibre of our being. (D. Thomas, D. D.)
The Word of God to be pondered
Read the Word of God much, said General Gordon, but chew it more. That is pondering. Make a practice of it; make a rule of it. (Bp. Talbot.)
Thou must prophesy again.—
Rules for Christian effort
I. Christian effort must be personal. Thou. The faculties of the individual man must be excited to activity in the cause of God. The most magnificent achievements of the human mind have been wrought out in lonely musings and lonely labours. If we would hew the rugged forms of our fellow-men into the symmetry and grace of Christian discipleship we must not be content to give subscriptions for evangelistic purposes; but we must feel a responsibility that is all our own, and while acting in brotherly union we must also act as if we had been specially called to a task in which no one has so much to do as ourselves.
II. Christian effort must be proportioned to personal ability. Thou must prophesy. John had the prophetic gift, and he was to use it. God has called thousands to His work, and though all cannot do the same thing, all are to do their best in that which they can do. A man with a divided mind, with his mind in part intent on his own ease, and in part only on the work of the Lord, will accomplish nothing worth naming. But let him unite his faculties, let him bring all the strength and all the determination of his soul to bear on the task to which he is called, let him throw the glow and enthusiasm of his nature into his duty with the bold avowal, This one thing I do, and though a thousand difficulties withstand him, he will sweep on to the consummation of his plains.
III. Christian effort must be repeated. Thou must prophesy again. Nothing great can be done all at once. It was only after many struggles that Wilberforce succeeded in the abolition of the slave trade. Nor are we to think that any strange thing has befallen us, or to deem it a reason for suspending our labours, if months or even years elapse before we see the moral and religious reformation at which we are aiming. We cannot reasonably expect that rude, ignorant, vicious men will all at once be transformed into melodious Davids, magnificent Isaiahs, or saintly Johns. We cannot reasonably expect that Babylon will come crashing to the ground at our first shout, and its ruins start at a touch into the majesty of a holy city. We shall have to prophesy again; we shall have to repeat our efforts before we see the pleasure of the Lord prosper in our hand.
IV. Christian effort must enlarge the scope of its movements. Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, etc. The more we do, the more we see there is to do. Patriotism owns that this is a land which, from white cliff in the south to sternest precipice in the north, is worthy of any labour and any self-sacrifice. If the statesman will contend from early evening until the morning crimsons the windows of the Senate House for measures by which he intends to enlarge the liberties and increase the happiness of the people–if the soldier will stride over the field of deadly fight and rush through the fiery breach that the foemans drum may not be beaten in our street, nor the foemans flag be lifted among our old ancestral oaks, it surely becomes us to raise ourselves to the level of Christian patriotism, and to stretch out our prayers and our labours so that they shall include the whole nation. (G. Marrat.)
.
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 8. Take the little book which is open] Learn from this angel what should be published to the world.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
And the voice which I heard from heaven; the voice mentioned Rev 10:4.
Go and take the little book; the little book mentioned Rev 10:2. John is bid to take this book, by which some understand the Scriptures; but it is most probably the book mentioned Rev 5:1, before sealed, now open.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
8. spake . . . and saidSoSyriac and Coptic read. But A, B, C, “(I heard)again speaking with me, and saying” (Greek, “lalousan. . . legousan“).
little bookSo Alephand B read. But A and C, “the book.”
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And the voice which I heard from heaven,…. In Re 10:4;
spake to me again, and said, go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth; as John was to prophesy, Re 10:11; it was necessary that he should have a mission and a commission from heaven; and that he should have the open book of prophecy to prophesy out of; and that he should receive this from the angel’s hands, who had unloosed its seals, and opened it: and just so to ordinary prophesying, or preaching, it is necessary that men should have their commission from heaven, should be called of God, and sent by him; and that they should have the book of the Scriptures before them, and open to them, and speak according to these oracles, agreeably to the law and to the testimony, which are profitable for doctrine; and that they should also receive the Gospel, and the doctrines of it, with gifts, and a commission to preach it, from the Angel of the covenant, Jesus Christ, who has all power both in heaven and in earth; see Re 10:2.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
| The Little Book. | A. D. 95. |
8 And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth. 9 And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey. 10 And I took the little book out of the angel’s hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter. 11 And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.
Here we have, I. A strict charge given to the apostle, which was, 1. That he should go and take the little book out of the hands of that mighty angel mentioned before. This charge was given, not by the angel himself who stood upon the earth, but by the same voice from heaven that in the fourth verse had lain an injunction upon him not to write what he had discerned by the seven thunders. 2. To eat the book; this part of the charge was given by the angel himself, hinting to the apostle that before he should publish what he had discovered he must more thoroughly digest the predictions, and be in himself suitably affected with them.
II. An account of the taste and relish which this little book would have, when the apostle had taken it in; at first, while in his mouth, sweet. All persons feel a pleasure in looking into future events, and in having them foretold; and all good men love to receive a word from God, of what import soever it be. But, when this book of prophecy was more thoroughly digested by the apostle, the contents would be bitter; these were things so awful and terrible, such grievous persecutions of the people of God, and such desolation made in the earth, that the foresight and foreknowledge of them would not be pleasant, but painful to the mind of the apostle: thus was Ezekiel’s prophecy to him, ch. iii. 3.
III. The apostle’s discharge of the duty he was called to (v. 10): He took the little book out of the angel’s hand, and ate it up, and he found the relish to be as was told him. 1. It becomes the servants of God to digest in their own souls the messages they bring to others in his name, and to be suitably affected therewith themselves. 2. It becomes them to deliver every message with which they are charged, whether pleasing or unpleasing to men. That which is least pleasing may be most profitable; however, God’s messengers must not keep back any part of the counsel of God.
IV. The apostle is made to know that this book of prophecy, which he had now taken in, was not given him merely to gratify his own curiosity, or to affect him with pleasure or pain, but to be communicated by him to the world. Here his prophetical commission seems to be renewed, and he is ordered to prepare for another embassy, to convey those declarations of the mind and will of God which are of great importance to all the world, and to the highest and greatest men in the world, and such should be read and recorded in many languages. This indeed is the case; we have them in our language, and are all obliged to attend to them, humbly to enquire into the meaning of them, and firmly to believe that every thing shall have its accomplishment in the proper time; and, when the prophecies shall be fulfilled, the sense and truth of them will appear, and the omniscience, power, and faithfulness of the great God will be adored.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Again speaking and saying ( ). Present active predicate participles feminine accusative singular agreeing with (object of ), not with (nominative) as most of the cursives have it ( ). Ordinarily it would be . See 4:1 for like idiom. This is the voice mentioned in verse 4. No great distinction is to be made here between and .
Go, take (H ). Present active imperative of and second aorist active imperative of . The use of (exclamation like ) is common in N.T. (Matt 5:24; Matt 8:4; Matt 19:21; John 4:16; John 9:7). Charles calls it a Hebraism (16:1). Note the repeated article here () referring to the open book in the hand of the angel (verse 2), only here is used, not the diminutive of of verses Rev 10:2; Rev 10:9; Rev 10:10.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Spake unto me. Render, as Rev., “I heard it again speaking.”
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
THE LITTLE BOOK TO BE EATEN v. 8-11
1) “And the voice which I heard from heaven,” (kai he phone hen ekousa ek tou ouranou) “And the voice which I heard out of (having come from) heaven,” to John on earth, Rev 10:1-3. It was the voice of the mighty (strong) angel or of the Son of God himself, Rev 10:4.
2) “Spake unto me again and said,” (palin lalousan met’ emou legousan) “was again speaking with me and saying,” as he had already spoken in thunderous reverberating tones, Rev 10:4.
3) “Go and take the little book,” (hupage labe to biblion) “Go thou and take the scroll,” the little book or pamphlet, or “come thou and take it.”
4) “Which is open in the hand of the angel,” (to enegomenon en te cheiri tou angelou) “The one Which is (exists) open, in the hand of the angel,” the divine minister or spiritual servant of God, Rev 10:2. An open book is a book of revelation or disclosure, Rev 4:1.
5) “Which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth,” (tou hestotos epi testhalasses kai epi tes ges) “of him who stands upon the sea and upon the land,” indicating a universal area of jurisdictional judgment upon men, Rev 10:5; Rev 12:7.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(8-9) And the voice . . .Translate, And the voice which I heard out of the heaven (I heard it) again talking with me (it is not the angel that speaks, but the voice which had bidden him seal up the thunders is heard again speaking), and saying, Go, take the roll (or, the little roll; there is a difference in the MSS.) which is opened in the hand of the angel who stands upon the sea and upon the earth. And I went away to the angel, telling him to give me the little book. And he saith to me, Take and eat it up; and it shall make bitter thy belly, but in thy mouth it shall be sweet as honey. The image of eating the roll is derived from the Old Testament. We meet with it in Ezekiel (Eze. 3:1-3) and Jeremiah (Jer. 15:16). The passage in Ezekiel is probably the basis of the present passage, and the chapter in which it occurs gives us the meaning of the symbol: the eating of the roll, or the words of the roll, is the complete mastering of the contents of the bookthe digesting, as we say, its meaning, till the principles and truths are thoroughly familiar and loved. All my words (so runs the explanatory verse, Eze. 3:10) that I shall speak unto thee receive in thine heart and hear with thine ears. It is similar to the Psalmists practice: Thy words have I hid within my heart; he made himself so familiar with them that they were no longer a code of laws, but a constant instinct, a second nature to him. Thus preeminently should he be familiar with his Masters words and heart, saturated with his Masters principles, who is to be a witness and a prophet for his Lord. He who would carry Gods words to another must first be impressed and penetrated with them himself. He must not only hear, read, mark, and learn, but also (according to the Scriptural figure) inwardly digest them.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3. The third prophetic commission bestowed on St. John , vv8-11.
8. The object of the appearance of the commissioning angel to John now becomes apparent. It is to give him HIS THIRD COMMISSION to unfold to the world the prophetic volumen which the angel’s utterances have indicated. The voice which I heard, in Rev 10:4. Go The seer is standing on the plane of vision, note Rev 5:14; the angel’s feet are on the lower ground of earth and sea. It might be easy for him to move to the level of the angel’s hand, and take the little book.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And the voice which I heard from Heaven, I heard again speaking to me and saying, “Go, take the scroll which is open in the hand of the angel who stands on the sea and on the earth”. And I went to the angel telling him that he should give me the small scroll, and he says to me’ “Take it, and eat it up. And it will make your stomach bitter but in your mouth it will be as sweet as honey”. And I took the small scroll from the angel’s hand, and ate it up, and it was in my mouth sweet as honey, and when I had eaten it my stomach was made bitter. And they say to me, “You must prophesy again concerning many peoples and nations, and tongues and kings”.’
John was told that he had to take the scroll from the angel and eat it. In other words he was to devour its contents (it is an open scroll). The scroll was sweet to him because it declared the doings of God, but when it was devoured it was bitter because of the awfulness of its message. Whether he did actually eat it or whether the eating of it was simply a way of describing his devouring of its contents does not really matter. What mattered was that he did ‘devour’ its contents and the effect it had on him. John does not find the words of judgment easy to declare. No preacher should preach the judgment of God easily, he should always be aware of a certain unhappiness in what he has to proclaim. When men declare the judgments of God too glibly or too harshly they have become unworthy messengers. (For further on the small scroll see on Rev 10:2).
‘They say to me’. The voice from Heaven and the strong angel both stress to him his mission. They understand his feelings, but urge him to be faithful and strong. As we move into the second part of the book we will find his prophecies concerning these peoples and nations, and tongues and kings, for many are involved in his words.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
John swallows the little book:
v. 8. And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.
v. 9. And I went unto the angel and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.
v. 10. And I took the little book out of the angel’s hand and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey; and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter.
v. 11. And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples and nations and tongues and kings. This is another interlude with a strange cast: And the voice which I had heard out of heaven I (once more heard) speaking to me and saying, Go take the opened booklet out of the hand of the angel that stands on the sea and on the earth. This vision resembles that related Eze 3:1-27, l-3, and it has much the same meaning. The voice from heaven is again distinguished from that of the angel, as it bids John take the open booklet from the angel.
The scene grows in strangeness: And I went to the angel, saying to him, Give me the booklet; and he said to me, Take and swallow it, and it will make thy stomach bitter, but in thy mouth it will be sweet as honey. Surely a most peculiar situation which has the angel voice such a command, that the seer devour the small scroll, which, though it would taste sweet, would be bitter to digest. But John obeyed: And I took the booklet out of the hand of the angel and swallowed it, and it was in my mouth sweet as honey; and when I had eaten it, my stomach was bitter. As he had been told, he eagerly devoured the scroll, and the effects were just as the angel had foretold, a sweet taste in the mouth, but a feeling of great bitterness in the stomach.
John now receives a last command: And he said to me, It is necessary that thou prophesy again of peoples and nations and tongues and many kings. The revelation had been made, and John was commissioned to make known the visions. The message which he should proclaim concerned all men of all nations and of all tongues, rulers and subjects alike. Thus we again have evidence that the seer wrote at the command and by the inspiration of the Lord, that we have, in this book, eternal truth.
It now remains to see what this vision, as a whole, signifies. The force of the entire picture seems to point to a preparation for the last woe, and in this sense it was understood by most Lutheran commentators. The entire appearance of the angel symbolizes the essence and the character of the last woe. He came with great spiritual show, as one that personified Christ Himself, as one that represented Christ’s work, Christ’s truth, Christ’s kingdom, His threatening voice demanded acknowledgement of his person and of his doctrine, of his decrees, as they were contained in the booklet, in the small scroll. As John found, these decrees and doctrines were indeed sweet to the taste and pleasant to the flesh, but he was later convinced that they were dangerous for heart and conscience, that they destroyed faith. Thus this angel, under the guise of the highest sanctity, represents the power of hell, which appeared with great spiritual show and under the name and the mask of Christ, but whose intention was through doctrines of men, which pleased the perverted flesh, to destroy both faith and conscience. This description, as we shall see, fits the Pope of Rome as the true Anti-Christ.
Summary
The seer beholds an angel with a booklet coming down from heaven, bearing a threatening message; he swallows the little scroll and experiences a sweet taste in the mouth, followed by a bitter feeling in the stomach.
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
Rev 10:8-11 . At the command of the heavenly voice (Rev 10:4 ), John eats the little book given him by the angel, and receives the instruction that he must once again prophesy.
,
-g0- -g0- . The construction in this correct reading [2752] is like that of Rev 4:1 , but yet unsymmetrical, as here not only the in the mind of the author is received into the relative clause by attraction, but also the is placed before because of the connection of the declaration just repeated with that mentioned, Rev 10:4 . If the sentence in which, in any case, the aor. is intended as a plusquam-perfect, were altogether symmetrical in its reference to Rev 10:4 (cf. Rev 4:1 ), its construction in accord with the nom. would run: . ., . . . , ( ) . Likewise De Wette, Ebrard.
. As in Rev 16:1 , Mat 5:24 ; Mat 8:4 , etc., [2753] an actual going is represented, accordingly in Rev 10:9 it is said .
, cf. Rev 5:7 . John is to take this book to himself (Rev 10:9 ).
. How John, who continues to have his standpoint in heaven (cf. Rev 10:1 ), could go to the angel who stands on the earth and sea, is not made perceptible to sober view, because in the vision the question is only concerning the act of going. But even if one, like De Wette, consider that John, even prior to ch. 10, “had occupied the standpoint of Zechariah, Ezekiel, and Daniel,” the difficulty of the remains essentially the same; hence De Wette has properly reached no conclusion from this expression concerning the standpoint of John.
. Concerning this inf., [2754] dependent on the , cf. Winer, p. 296.
. The eating of the book [2755] is within the entire visionary scene not to be regarded an expression intended allegorically, but as a real act of John; just as Ezekiel (Rev 2:9 sqq.) by eating a book receives the contents of its prophetic discourses. The meaning of the visionary fact is correctly given already by Beda: “Take into your inward parts, and contain within the space of thy heart.” What Jer 15:16 in figurative language calls an eating of the words of divine revelation, which must be converted by the prophet into marrow and blood, [2756] we find here, as in Ezekiel, represented in an actual visionary transaction. [2757]
. From the fact that the angel speaks first of the bitter effect and then of the sweet taste of the little book, but John himself (Rev 10:10 ) the reverse, it does not follow that “both vigorously struggled for priority.” [2758] According to the context, the “priority” belongs not only as to order, but also as to minor dignity to the sweetness, because the book comes first into the mouth and last into the belly. According to this most simple order, John himself reports, Rev 10:10 . The angel looks at it differently, since he speaks, as the combination of the two expressions into one antithesis shows, not according to the mere consequences, but with respect to the inner nature and effect. The angel intends first to prepare John for the bitter effect, but then he also says that the book will be in his mouth sweet as honey. This is also against Beng., who, by a comparison of Rev 10:9-10 , immediately infers two kinds of sweetness, one before and one after the bitterness.
The relation of ( . . , Rev 10:10 ; cf. Rev 8:11 ) and is, in accordance with the context, to be determined according to both norms: that one and the same book is sweet and bitter according as it enters the mouth or the belly; then, that the distinction between the mouth and the belly is understood only with reference to the eating. Incorrect, therefore, are both the explanation which refers the sweetness and bitterness to the difference between the joyful and the sad contents of the book, [2759] in connection with which a further error is readily intruded, that, with a result contrary to the context, speaks of “bitter-sweet” contents, indicating that only after a sad visitation could glorious joy enter; [2760] and also that which in connection with a false interpretation of the little book itself, of the . , Rev 10:11 , yea even of the angel, Rev 10:1 ; Rev 10:8 regards the mouth of John not as the organ of eating (receiving), but of speaking, and then refers the bitterness to the persecutions and all the hinderances with which the evangelical preaching of John or the entire Church met. [2761] With correctness, Vitr., C. a Lap., De Wette, Stern, Hengstenb., etc., have interpreted, that, as the mouth refers to the receiving of the revelation given in the little book, so the not , as Cod. A reads, and Andr. explains, disturbing the clearness of the idea of the text by mingling therewith a rash interpretation is directed to the comprehension, i.e., the further scrutiny [2762] and perception, of the revelation received. [See Note LXVI., p. 309.] How little the sweetness of the reception, as such, was hindered by the bitterness of the contents of revelation, is shown by the symbol of Ezekiel, in whose mouth the book written with mourning and woe is . [2763] But he also went bitterly , after he had filled his belly therewith, [2764] in the heat of his spirit. [2765]
By eating the book, John is made able to proclaim its contents. Therefore Rev 10:11 follows: , . . . The plur. [2766] makes the speaking subject entirely indefinite; the modified var. points to the angel.
. The designates not the inner, subjective necessity, that John now cannot help prophesying, because by eating the book he has been capacitated for prophesying, [2767] but the objective necessity depending upon the will of God, who accordingly gives his revelation. [2768] The does not contrast John’s prophecy with that of the ancient prophets, [2769] but designates a second of John himself, yet not a preaching after a return from exile, [2770] but the new prophecy for which the eaten book has fitted him in its relation to the prophesying practised upon the ground of previous visions. This occurs therefore in the succeeding part of the Apoc. [2771]
. Incorrectly, Beng: “To nations beyond,” in the sense that there are still many nations, etc., which are, meantime, to come before that is fulfilled which is here described prior to the transition to the second woe. has this meaning neither in Heb 9:17 , 1Co 14:26 , nor elsewhere. Likewise incorrectly, Ebrard: “Before nations,” i.e., so that “the nations have it declared to them.” The with the dat. designates, precisely as in Joh 12:16 , the object which the prophecy grasps, i.e., concerning which the prophecy is made. The grammatical relation is precisely the same as in the construction of with the dative accompanying verbs designating joy, astonishment, etc., concerning any thing. [2772] The occasion for the false construction of the lies, in Ebrard, in the view of the contents of the book, and the range of the prophecy conditioned thereby. If the is completed with Rev 11:13 , and is intended for the Church, it cannot be said here, Rev 10:11 , that John is to prophesy concerning nations and kings; and if Hengstenb., who likewise [2773] finds in Rev 11:1-13 the prophecy announced in Rev 10:11 , and refers it to the degenerate churches, yet explains correctly the , . . ., and compares therewith what is said of kings, chs. 16, 17, 19, this is inconsistent with his view of the little book and the . ., just to the extent that it is correct according to the context. Ewald who agrees formally with Hengstenb. and Ebrard, since he also finds in Rev 11:1-13 the contents of the eaten book, but interprets this new prophecy as referring to the destruction of Jerusalem refers the , . . ., to Rev 11:2 ; Rev 11:7 ; Rev 11:9 ; but since the prophecy Rev 11:1-13 is actually one concerning Jerusalem, it cannot well be called at Rev 10:11 a prophecy concerning peoples, nations, languages, and many kings. [2774] Besides, Ew. has understood the significant position of the angel, Rev 10:2 , with relation to Rome as capital of the world. The result, therefore, is not that the is explained ungrammatically, but that we must seek the correct reference of the , which must concur with the correct view of the contents of the little book eaten. Upon this depends the ultimate determination of the view of the entire transaction in ch. 10.
[2752] See Critical Notes.
[2753] Cf. the , Rev 5:7 ; also the , Rev 6:4-5 ; Rev 6:7 .
[2754] Act 21:21 .
[2755] Cf. Rev 10:10 , where the command is fulfilled by John.
[2756] Cf., besides, Psa 40:9 .
[2757] Ew., etc. Cf. Knobel, Proph ., I. p. 373.
[2758] Hengstenb.
[2759] Heinr., Ewald.
[2760] Herd., Rinck.
[2761] Beda, Aret., Par., etc.
[2762] Cf. 1Pe 1:10 sq.
[2763] Eze 3:3 ; cf. Eze 2:10 .
[2764] Rev 10:3 : .
[2765] Rev 10:4 : , which the LXX. do not at all translate.
[2766] Cf. Rev 12:6 .
[2767] Beng., Hengstenb.
[2768] Cf., in general, Rev 1:1 sqq.
[2769] Beng.
[2770] Primas, Beda, Vieg.
[2771] Grot., Alcas., De Wette, Hengstenb., Ebrard, etc., who, in the more accurate determination, vary much in other respects from one another.
[2772] Winer, p. 368.
[2773] Cf. also Klief.
[2774] i.e., all the world, those . Cf. Rev 5:9 .
The allegorical explanations are to be rejected, as entirely in violation of the context, which betray their arbitrariness by their infinite diversity. The mighty angel, Rev 10:1 , can as little stand for the Emperor Justin, the defender of the Church against the Arians, and the Emperor Justinian, [2775] or [2776] the evangelical preachers, as whose representative others, like Beda already, understand John, or indeed the Pope, [2777] as the little book eaten by John can be the Codex Justinianus , [2778] or the N. T. [2779] The most important interpreters [2780] are unanimous in regarding the contents of this little book, which is eaten, as prophecy which is written in the Apoc. itself, and that, too, in the part which follows ch. 10. But there is controversy both as to the more accurate determination of the section which is regarded as containing the prophecy proceeding from the book that is eaten, and also, which is essentially connected therewith, as to the relation between the book that is eaten, and the seal-book, ch. 5. The opinion that both books are identical [2781] is answered already by the fact that John, after having thus far prophesied upon the ground of the book of ch. 5, now is to prophesy anew upon the ground of the little book that is eaten. Accordingly, the directly opposite view is readily suggested, that both books have nothing whatever to do with one another, but that the little book, ch. 10, contains something entirely peculiar, viz., what is described in Rev 11:1-13 : i.e., according to Grot., Wetst., Eichh., Ew., the fate of Jerusalem; according to Hengstenb., the fate of the degenerate Church. [2782] But it is neither correct that the contents of the book of fate, ch. 5, are already fully settled in what has been hitherto given, [2783] nor is it conceivable that that book of fate should contain nothing of the fate of Jerusalem, the “degenerate Church,” [2784] which is not to be revealed to the prophet until by the little book, ch. 10; [2785] neither, if the contents of the book that is eaten be limited to Rev 11:1-13 , whether in Ewald’s or Hengstenb.’s sense, does it agree with the statement of Rev 10:11 , according to which John is to prophesy concerning peoples and many kings. The instance deduced from Rev 10:11 [2786] applies also against Vitr., who, in the little book of ch. 10, finds a part of the book of ch. 5, limits its contents likewise to Rev 11:1-13 , and interprets it as a prophecy concerning the calamities of the Western Church. The correct point in Vitr. is the view that the little book of ch. 10 comprises a part of all that which is to happen contained in the book of fate of ch. 5; viz., all that which has not, as yet , issued from the book of fate through the succession of seal- and trumpet-visions; in other words, all that from Rev 11:1 has been written by John in consequence of the , . . .; [2787] therefore not in the false sense [2788] that “the book of completion” only substantially repeats, in its way, the contents already present in the preceding “book of declaration.” This follows from what in Rev 10:11 is said concerning the prophecy of John, which proceeds from the book which was eaten; but it admits the less a restriction to Rev 11:1-13 (where what is said is concerning Jerusalem), and rather requires the more certainly the further reference to what is written, ch. 12 sqq., as the discourse of the angel, Rev 10:6 sq., extending to the full end, stands in more significant parallel with the contents of the book brought by him. For it also agrees with this, that the of John in no way stands out of connection with the book of fate including of itself the entire prophecy concerning what was to occur; but rather not only does Rev 11:1-13 belong in the series of the woes, but also all that from Rev 11:15 succeeds the trumpets, which by means of the seals, from the last of which they have proceeded, belongs to the sphere of the book of fate. And when the angel, who brings the little book, looks towards Jerusalem, Rev 10:2 , it agrees with this, that the most immediate object of the new prophecy, Rev 10:11 , is in fact Jerusalem (Rev 11:1 sq.); but the perspective opened, Rev 10:7 , extends to the ultimate end; so that from the little book, in the fulness corresponding to Rev 10:11 , there follow also the prophecies of ch. 12 sqq. Thus the little book which was brought to John opened, and was eaten by him, appears to be an inner instruction and interpretation given the seer concerning visions still impending, and which are to continue until the full end. And the more important the subjects of the prophecy that now follow, for we come now to the proper goal, while all that precedes is only preparatory, the more natural appears the new special preparation of the prophet.
[2775] Rev 10:8 . N. de Lyra.
[2776] According to the older Protestant expositors.
[2777] Luther.
[2778] N. de Lyra.
[2779] Aret., etc.
[2780] C. a Lap., Grot., Calov., Vitr., Beng., Ew., De Wette, Hengstenb., etc.
[2781] C. a Lap., Zeger, Calov.
[2782] Cf. also Ebrard.
[2783] Against Hengstenb.
[2784] Hengstenb.
[2785] Against Ewald, etc.
[2786] Cf. Rev 10:6 sqq.
[2787] Beng., De Wette.
[2788] Volkm.
NOTES BY THE AMERICAN EDITOR
LXVI. Rev 10:9 .
J. Gerhard (quoted by Calov.): “The pleasure of the mouth is a symbol of the pleasure which the godly derive from the revelation of divine mysteries before they fully perceive them. The dolor ventris is a symbol of the pain which they derive from the consideration of the persecution to be described in the succeeding prophecy, which antichrist will exercise against the Church at the end of the world.” Primasius: “When you have received it, you will be delighted by the sweetness of the Divine speech (Ps. 19:15), the hope of promised salvation, and the charm of Divine justice. But you will experience the bitterness when this is to be preached to both devout and undevout.” Stier: “The evangelizing to the prophets must always have been fraught with a certain degree of bitterness to human nature.” Luthardt: “Bitter poison to the belly, i.e., to man so far as he belongs to this transitory world (cf. 1Co 6:13 ); but so far as he is God’s, it is sweet joy (cf. Psa 19:11 ), for it is a word of judgment to the world, but redemption to the Church, which, with its mouth, preaches God.”
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
(8) And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth. (9) And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey. (10) And I took the little book out of the angel’s hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter. (11) And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.
This is a very interesting part of this chapter. John is ordered to go to Christ, and to take out of his hand the open book. Now observe. When Christ took the book from the hand of his Father, it was sealed. He, and He alone, can open to us the decrees of God. I am the way, saith Christ, and the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by me, Joh 14:6 . Had not Christ come forth from God, to make known God, never should we have known the way to God. But when John, or any man, takes the book from Jesus, it must be opened to us or we shall never understand it. Reader! except Jesus gives the book, opened by himself, to those who minister in his name; and except Jesus by his Spirit ordains them; ministers, as they call themselves, or as they are called of men, had better never have ran to the service. Popes, bishops, or prelates, not sent of Christ, will have a woeful account to give in, the end of the day. I have not sent these prophets, (saith the Lord,) yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied, Jer 23:21 .
What a lovely view is here given of John! Immediately, on command, he went to Christ. To whom shall the Lord’s servants go but to their Master? From whom can they receive their authority, or their instruction, but from Him? Sweetly Peter, who knew this, said, Lord! to whom shall we go, thou hast the words of eternal life And what John saith of the sweet taste of the book, and the bitter effects afterwards, is fulfilled in all God’s servants, who minister in his name, as well as in the hearts of those who are ministered unto. When first the word is received, in joy of the Holy Ghost, with much affliction, by reason of our conscious sense of sin, everything we hear of Christ, and feel of Christ, is sweet. But when persecutions come on, and the conflicts of flesh and spirit are at the height, bitter are the seasons of trial. And what it is with the faithful followers of the Lord, in their private life and conversation, such, in an eminent degree, is it with the ministers of Christ in their public ministry. Oh! who shall say what soul exercises he goeth through, both for himself and people, while laboring in the word and doctrine; that is, faithful to God and to souls? Lord! do thou give to thy servants grace, that in all things they may approve themselves ministers of God!
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
8 And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.
Ver. 8. In the hand of the angel which standeth ] This description of Christ is here purposely repeated, that we may learn to trust in his power and fly to his wisdom, as Agur did, Pro 30:1-2 , for the understanding of divine mysteries.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
8 11 .] The delivery of the little book to John, and announcement of a further work of prophecy to be carried on by him . And the voice which I heard out of heaven, (I) again (heard) talking with me and saying (the sentence is a curious instance of mixed construction. One of its simple forms would be . . . . : the other, . . . . . . The former member of the first of these, and the latter member of the second, are united in the text), Go take the book which lieth open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth. And I went away (from my former place as a spectator in heaven: from which, however, the Seer docs not seem wholly to remove, cf. ch. Rev 11:16 ; Rev 19:1 ff., although his principal spot of observation is henceforth the earth: cf. ch. Rev 11:1 , Rev 14:1 , Rev 17:3 , &c.) to the angel telling him (the pres. part. contains the reason of the ) to give me the little book. And he saith to me, Take and eat it up (cf. Eze 3:1 ff.; Jer 15:16 ; Psa 40:9 ): and it shall embitter thy belly, but in thy mouth shall be sweet as honey. And I took the book out of the hand of the angel and ate it up: and it was in my mouth as honey, sweet; and when I had eaten it up, my belly was embittered (there is the difference between Ezekiel’s roll and this, that, in the prophet’s case, only the sweetness in the mouth is mentioned. The Angel, dwelling most on the most important thing, the working of the contents of the book, puts the bitterness first: the Evangelist, in relating what happened, follows the order of time. The text itself will guard us against some misinterpretations of this bitterness and sweetness. It is plain that we must understand these to belong, not to differing characters of different portions of the contents of the book (as Heinr., Ewald), but to different sensations of the Evangelist in different parts of his body respecting one and the same content of the book. Nor again must we invert the order, imagining (as Herder and Rinck) that the first bitterness leads afterwards to sweetness and joy, or (as Bede, Aretius, al.) that the bitterness in the belly indicates the reception by the Evangelist, but the sweetness in the mouth, the declaration to others; proceeding on a misunderstanding of Rev 10:11 . For further particulars, see below). And they say ( leaves the speakers quite indefinite; amounting in fact to no more than “it was said”) to me, Thou must (i. e. it is God’s will that thou shouldest: a command is laid upon thee so to do) again prophesy (as thou hast done before in writing the former part of the : see in the interpretation below) concerning (not, as E.V. “ before :” nor can with a dat. bear such a meaning. The substantives which follow the preposition are the objects of the . So in reff. See Winer, edn. 6, 48, c. C) peoples and nations and languages and many kings (i. e. concerning the inhabitants of the earth, as before: cf. ch. Rev 5:9 , where the Lamb’s worthiness to open the former is connected with His having redeemed . . . ).
I have postponed till this point the question, what we are to understand by the , and the Seer’s concern with it. And I will at once say, before discussing the various differing interpretations, that I conceive the simple acceptation of the description and symbolism here can lead but to one conclusion; viz. that it represents the above spoken of, the subject of the remainder of the apocalyptic prophecies. So far, many of the principal Commentators are at one. Indeed it is difficult to conceive how any other interpretation can have been thought of, except as made necessary by some previous self-committal of the Expositor regarding the sealed book of ch. 5, or by the exigencies of some historical system. But within the limits of this agreed meaning, there are many different views as to the extent of the reference of the “little book” to that which follows, and as to its relation to the seven-sealed book of ch. 5. As regards these points, we may remark, 1) that the contents of the “little book” cannot well be confined to ch. Rev 11:1-13 , or we should not have had so solemn an inauguration of it, nor so wide-reaching an announcement of the duty of the Apostle consequent on the receipt of it: 2) that the oath of the Angel must necessarily be connected with his bearing of the open book on his hand, and if so, makes it necessary to infer that the contents of the book are identical with the mystery, respecting which he swears: 3) that the episode which follows, containing the first work of the Apostle under this his new prophetic commission, inchoates an entirely new matter the things which befall the Church of God and the holy city, which new character of incidents continues to prevail until the very end of the book: 4) that the relation of this “little book” to the sealed book of ch. 5 can hardly be doubtful to the readers of this Commentary, seeing that we have maintained that book to be the sum of the divine purposes, which is not opened at all within the limits of the apocalyptic vision, but only prepared to be opened by the removal of its seven seals. That this is not that complete record of the divine purposes, nor, technically speaking, any portion of it, must be evident to us. For it forms a small detached roll or volume, lying open on the angel’s hand: it is destined for the especial individual behoof of the Seer, into whom it passes, and becomes assimilated with himself, to be given forth as he should be directed to utter it. 5) That it contained more than we possess in the remaining portion of this book, is probable. St. John doubtless knew more than he has told us. Previously to this, he knew what the seven thunders uttered: and subsequently to this, we can hardly imagine that he was ignorant of the name of the wild beast, whose number he has given us.
It remains that we say something on the circumstances accompanying the Apostle’s reception of the mysterious book. Its sweetness , when he tasted it, allusive as it is to the same circumstance in Ezekiel’s eating the roll which was all lamentation, mourning, and woe, doubtless represents present satisfaction at being informed of, and admitted to know, a portion of God’s holy will: of those words of which the Psalmist said, Psa 119:103 , “How sweet are thy words unto my taste, yea sweeter than honey unto my mouth!” But when the roll came to be not only tasted, but digested, the nature of its contents felt within the man, bitterness took the place of sweetness: the persecutions, the apostasies, the judgments, of the church and people of the Lord, saddened the spirit of the Seer, and dashed his joy at the first reception of the mystery of God.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Rev 10:8 . ( cf. Rev 10:4 ) left ungrammatically without a predicate, the two participles being irregularly attracted into the case of ( cf. Rev 1:1 , Rev 4:11 ).
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Rev 10:8-11
8Then the voice which I heard from heaven, I heard again speaking with me, and saying, “Go, take the book which is open in the hand of the angel who stands on the sea and on the land.” 9So I went to the angel, telling him to give me the little book. And he said to me, “Take it and eat it; it will make your stomach bitter, but in your mouth it will be sweet as honey.” 10I took the little book out of the angel’s hand and ate it, and in my mouth it was sweet as honey; and when I had eaten it, my stomach was made bitter. 11And they said to me, “You must prophesy again concerning many peoples and nations and tongues and kings.”
Rev 10:8 “the voice which I heard from heaven, I heard again” There has been much speculation about the identification of the speaker. Some have asserted that it is God, or Christ, or the Holy Spirit, or one of the powerful angels.
In Rev 10:11 the voice is plural, possibly referring to the Triune God. The plurals used of deity in the OT (the name Elohim and the “us” of Gen 1:26; Gen 3:22; Gen 7:11; Isa 6:8) have been explained in several ways.
1. a grammatical form called “the plural of majesty” whereby the plural intensifies the concept or term
2. YHWH speaking collectively of the angelic council (cf. 1Ki 22:19; Job 1:6; Job 2:1; Jer 23:18; Dan 7:10)
3. an incipient form of the concept of a Triune God or Trinity (cf. Psa 110:1; Zech. 2:8; 17:10)
See SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY at Rev 1:8.
Rev 10:9 “‘Take it and eat it'” This is an allusion to Eze 2:8 to Eze 3:14 or Jer 15:16-17. This symbolizes being commissioned to speak God’s message. The little book symbolizes God’s message which contains both assurance to believers (honey, cf. Psa 19:10-11; Psa 119:103) and judgment to unbelievers (bitter). This scroll is not the same as the one that Jesus opened in chapter 6. This refers to the message from the almighty angel (cf. Rev 10:7-11).
Rev 10:11 “they said to me” The powerful angel or the Triune God is affirming John as prophetic recorder and spokesman.
“many peoples and nations and tongues and kings” This terminology is used of both unbelievers (cf. Rev 11:9; Rev 13:7-8; Rev 14:6; Rev 17:15) and believers (i.e.,before Judgment Day cf. Rev 7:9; Rev 15:4 and after Judgment Day cf. Rev 21:24; Rev 21:26; Rev 22:2). This verse could refer to preaching the gospel (cf. Rev 10:11; Rev 14:6) to all nations (cf. Mat 24:14; Mar 13:10) or the prediction of further temporal judgments of the wrath of God.
Revelation 11
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
spake . . . Read. “(I heard) speaking”. Same as “uttered” in Rev 10:3.
unto = with. Greek. meta. App-104.
said = saying.
little book = book. Greek. biblion.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
8-11.] The delivery of the little book to John, and announcement of a further work of prophecy to be carried on by him. And the voice which I heard out of heaven, (I) again (heard) talking with me and saying (the sentence is a curious instance of mixed construction. One of its simple forms would be . . . . : the other, . . . . . . The former member of the first of these, and the latter member of the second, are united in the text), Go take the book which lieth open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth. And I went away (from my former place as a spectator in heaven: from which, however, the Seer docs not seem wholly to remove, cf. ch. Rev 11:16; Rev 19:1 ff., although his principal spot of observation is henceforth the earth: cf. ch. Rev 11:1, Rev 14:1, Rev 17:3, &c.) to the angel telling him (the pres. part. contains the reason of the ) to give me the little book. And he saith to me, Take and eat it up (cf. Eze 3:1 ff.; Jer 15:16; Psa 40:9): and it shall embitter thy belly, but in thy mouth shall be sweet as honey. And I took the book out of the hand of the angel and ate it up: and it was in my mouth as honey, sweet; and when I had eaten it up, my belly was embittered (there is the difference between Ezekiels roll and this, that, in the prophets case, only the sweetness in the mouth is mentioned. The Angel, dwelling most on the most important thing, the working of the contents of the book, puts the bitterness first: the Evangelist, in relating what happened, follows the order of time. The text itself will guard us against some misinterpretations of this bitterness and sweetness. It is plain that we must understand these to belong, not to differing characters of different portions of the contents of the book (as Heinr., Ewald), but to different sensations of the Evangelist in different parts of his body respecting one and the same content of the book. Nor again must we invert the order, imagining (as Herder and Rinck) that the first bitterness leads afterwards to sweetness and joy, or (as Bede, Aretius, al.) that the bitterness in the belly indicates the reception by the Evangelist, but the sweetness in the mouth, the declaration to others; proceeding on a misunderstanding of Rev 10:11. For further particulars, see below). And they say ( leaves the speakers quite indefinite; amounting in fact to no more than it was said) to me, Thou must (i. e. it is Gods will that thou shouldest: a command is laid upon thee so to do) again prophesy (as thou hast done before in writing the former part of the : see in the interpretation below) concerning (not, as E.V. before: nor can with a dat. bear such a meaning. The substantives which follow the preposition are the objects of the . So in reff. See Winer, edn. 6, 48, c. C) peoples and nations and languages and many kings (i. e. concerning the inhabitants of the earth, as before: cf. ch. Rev 5:9, where the Lambs worthiness to open the former is connected with His having redeemed . . . ).
I have postponed till this point the question, what we are to understand by the , and the Seers concern with it. And I will at once say, before discussing the various differing interpretations, that I conceive the simple acceptation of the description and symbolism here can lead but to one conclusion; viz. that it represents the above spoken of, the subject of the remainder of the apocalyptic prophecies. So far, many of the principal Commentators are at one. Indeed it is difficult to conceive how any other interpretation can have been thought of, except as made necessary by some previous self-committal of the Expositor regarding the sealed book of ch. 5, or by the exigencies of some historical system. But within the limits of this agreed meaning, there are many different views as to the extent of the reference of the little book to that which follows, and as to its relation to the seven-sealed book of ch. 5. As regards these points, we may remark, 1) that the contents of the little book cannot well be confined to ch. Rev 11:1-13, or we should not have had so solemn an inauguration of it, nor so wide-reaching an announcement of the duty of the Apostle consequent on the receipt of it: 2) that the oath of the Angel must necessarily be connected with his bearing of the open book on his hand, and if so, makes it necessary to infer that the contents of the book are identical with the mystery, respecting which he swears: 3) that the episode which follows, containing the first work of the Apostle under this his new prophetic commission, inchoates an entirely new matter-the things which befall the Church of God and the holy city, which new character of incidents continues to prevail until the very end of the book: 4) that the relation of this little book to the sealed book of ch. 5 can hardly be doubtful to the readers of this Commentary, seeing that we have maintained that book to be the sum of the divine purposes, which is not opened at all within the limits of the apocalyptic vision, but only prepared to be opened by the removal of its seven seals. That this is not that complete record of the divine purposes, nor, technically speaking, any portion of it, must be evident to us. For it forms a small detached roll or volume, lying open on the angels hand: it is destined for the especial individual behoof of the Seer, into whom it passes, and becomes assimilated with himself, to be given forth as he should be directed to utter it. 5) That it contained more than we possess in the remaining portion of this book, is probable. St. John doubtless knew more than he has told us. Previously to this, he knew what the seven thunders uttered: and subsequently to this, we can hardly imagine that he was ignorant of the name of the wild beast, whose number he has given us.
It remains that we say something on the circumstances accompanying the Apostles reception of the mysterious book. Its sweetness, when he tasted it, allusive as it is to the same circumstance in Ezekiels eating the roll which was all lamentation, mourning, and woe, doubtless represents present satisfaction at being informed of, and admitted to know, a portion of Gods holy will: of those words of which the Psalmist said, Psa 119:103, How sweet are thy words unto my taste, yea sweeter than honey unto my mouth! But when the roll came to be not only tasted, but digested,-the nature of its contents felt within the man,-bitterness took the place of sweetness: the persecutions, the apostasies, the judgments, of the church and people of the Lord, saddened the spirit of the Seer, and dashed his joy at the first reception of the mystery of God.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
angel
See note, (See Scofield “Heb 1:4”).
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes
the voice: Rev 10:4, Rev 10:5, Isa 30:21
Reciprocal: Eze 2:9 – a roll Zec 5:1 – roll Mat 14:25 – walking Act 15:20 – from pollutions Rev 5:1 – a book Rev 10:2 – he set Rev 21:3 – a great
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Rev 10:8. This little book is the one mentioned in verse 2 which contains predictions of things about to begin. John was the human agency of God for delivering the message to the world, and hence it was appropriate for him to receive the book at the bidding of the angel. We note two angels are involved in this episode, the one that held the book and the other one that sounded the instructions to John.
Rev 10:9. In obedience to the instructions of the angel John went and requested the other angel to give him the little book. As the angel delivered it to him he told him to eat it up. This was a symbol and indicated that John was to be inspired to report to the people. A similar instance of such a symbolic inspiration of a prophet is in Eze 3:1-3. The book produced two opposite effects upon the prophet although he had only one body to absorb it. There was nothing inconsistent in John’s personal attitude toward the word of God, but the world would not take the same stand in view of the unpleasant things it contains in its teachings. Therefore John was required to have a bodily experience that represented both his and the people’s reaction to the word. See the note about “prophets acting” at 1Ki 20:35 in Volume 2 of Bible Commentary.
Rev 10:10. John took the book and ate it with the results that he was told what would happen within his body.
Comments by Foy E. Wallace
Verses 8-10.
The eating of the little book–Rev 10:8-10.
1. The voice from heaven: The voice again is the voice of verse 4; and from heaven identifies it with the voice from midst the throne, Rev 9:13. It was the voice of direct authority from God, not through any agents, angels, creatures, elders or mediaries of the visions–but from God himself.
2. In the mouth sweet–in the belly bitter. The symbol of eating a book is found in the apocalypses of Ezekiel, with the same effects as described in this vision. (Eze 2:9; Eze 3:7; Eze 3:14). The eating of this little book was in the mouth sweet as honey, as the precious flavor ascribed to the words of God. (Psa 19:10; Jer 15:16) The effects of eating the book were both sweet and bitter.
John said: In my mouth sweet–in my belly bitter. The assurances and promises of victory and of reward were “sweet as honey.” The contemplation of such triumphs produced the sweetness of joy and rejoicing; but the realization of the awful pronouncements fraught with fearful woes, turned the sweetness to bitterness in the belly, by reason of further contemplation on the tragic sufferings and sorrow, trials and tribulation they all would be called upon to endure in faithfulness, even in martyrdom, to receive the promised crown.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rev 10:8. The Seer is commanded to take the open book-roll in the hand of the angel.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Expositors generally make this little book the emblem of the holy scriptures; and the command given by the angel to St. John to eat this book, imports the great duty of studying diligently the holy scriptures, inwardly digesting them, and making them our own by particular application. What we eat is turned into nourishment, and becomes one substance with ourselves; thus the mysteries of the gospel must be eaten by the interpreters of gospel-mysteries. It is not enough that we know divine things, but we must know them divinely; we must have a savoury knowledge of them, and an experimental acquaintance with them.
Observe, 2. The effect which the eating of this book had upon St. John, it was in his mouth sweet as honey, in his belly very bitter: that is, the knowledge he had of divine mysteries, was in itself very pleasant, but the knowledge of the persecutions and cruelties which the Christians were to suffer and undergo, was very bitter to his soul.
Learn hence, That though communication of light from God, and the revelation of the mind and will of God, be in itself very delightful to his ministers, yet in respect to the said messages contained in his word, it is very burdensome and bitter to them; however, it being the burden of the Lord, they must bear it, they must carry it.
Every good man, much more every gracious minister, has a very high estimation of the word of God, he esteems it as food, he esteems it as necessary food, he esteems it more than his necessary food; but when God sends us to denounce judgments upon sinners, our belly trembles, our lips quiver, anguish takes hold upon us; we desire not the woeful day, Lord, thou knowest.
Observe lastly, The assurance God gives St. John of farther revelations of his mind unto him, As thou hast prophesied, so thou must prophesy again before many people, and nations, and tongues, and kings: see here in St. John’s person the true end and reason why God calls his ministers, and fits them with gifts, and why they furnish themselves the more serviceable in his work, that they may speak of his word before kings and not be ashamed.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
If the voice from heaven is not God’s, certainly the message is from Him. John is to take the little open book.
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
Rev 10:8-10. And the voice said, Go up to the angel standing upon the sea and the earth, and take the little book which is open To signify that its contents were not to be kept secret like those of the seven thunders, but revealed for the instruction, direction, encouragement, or warning of mankind, as well as those of the larger book; for it was a kind of second prophecy added to the former, and as it concerned kings and nations, so it was to be made public for their use and information. And I went unto the angel As I was directed; and said With boldness, in consequence of the divine command; Give me the little book. And he said, Take it, and eat it up As Ezekiel did that which was shown to him upon a like occasion; that is, consider its contents carefully, and digest them well in thy mind: and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey The knowledge of future things was, at first, pleasant, but the sad contents of the little book afterward filled his soul with sorrow. As this prophecy was to reveal the providences of God during the period of the seventh trumpet, in which, as there was a revelation of great opposition to true religion, and persecution of the faithful professors of it, so was there also a revelation of divine protection during the time of trial, and of a sure accomplishment of the promises concerning the glorious and happy state of the church in the end. The consideration of such a dispensation of Providence might well occasion a mixture of joy and grief in the apostles mind, as it must do in the minds of all who understand and reflect upon it.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
10:8 {7} And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go [and] take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.
(7) The other part of this chapter concerning the particular calling of John to the receiving of the following prophecy, which is enjoined him, first by sign, in three verses, then in plain words in the last verse Rev 10:9-11 . To the setting forth of the sign belong these things: That John is taught from heaven to ask for the book of the prophecy in this verse: for these motions and desires God inspires that asking for the book, he is charged to take it in a figurative manner, the use of which is expounded in Rev 10:9
(as in) Eze 2:9 whence this similitude is borrowed: lastly that John at the commandment of Christ took the book, and found by experience that the same as proceeding from Christ, was most sweet, but in that it foretells the afflictions of the Church, it was most bitter to his spirit.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
3. The instruction of the mighty angel 10:8-11
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
God or Christ (Rev 10:4) then commanded John to take the little book from the strong angel with authority over the whole planet (cf. Rev 5:7-8).