And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting.
30. Jacob was yet out ] These words dramatically represent to us the rapid succession of the two scenes, and remind us that, had Esau arrived a few minutes earlier, the dnouement would have been entirely different. Rebekah’s trick has been wholly successful. Jacob has won the blessing of the firstborn; he has won it with scarcely a minute to spare. A moment earlier; and he would have been detected “flagrante delicto.” The detection was bound to be made. But the risk was run for the sake of the irreversible and sacred “blessing of primogeniture,” conferred by a dying father.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
30-35. Esau came in from hishuntingScarcely had the former scene been concluded, when thefraud was discovered. The emotions of Isaac, as well as Esau, mayeasily be imaginedthe astonishment, alarm, and sorrow of the one;the disappointment and indignation of the other. But a moment’sreflection convinced the aged patriarch that the transfer of theblessing was “of the Lord,” and now irrevocable. Theimportunities of Esau, however, overpowered him; and as the propheticafflatus was upon the patriarch, he added what was probably aspleasing to a man of Esau’s character as the other would have been.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of,
blessing Jacob,…. So that he had the whole entire blessing, and nothing wanting; and takes in blessings of all sorts, temporal, spiritual, and eternal, of which the land of Canaan, and the fruits of it, were typical:
and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father; which no doubt he made haste to do, as soon as he had got the blessing; partly to avoid his brother, whom he might expect to come in every moment, and partly to relate to his mother the success he had met with: or “scarce in going out was gone out” z, was just gone out, and that was all; the Targum of Jonathan says, he was gone about two hands’ breadths; that is, out of the door of his father’s tent, which was a small space indeed. Jarchi interprets this doubling of the word, of the one going out and the other coming in at the same time; but Ainsworth more rightly observes, that it makes the matter the more remarkable, touching God’s providence herein:
that Esau his brother came in from his hunting; and not only was come out of the field from hunting, but had been at home some time, and had dressed what he had caught in hunting, and was just coming in with it to his father, as appears from Ge 27:31.
z “tantum, vel vix exeundo exierat”, Montanus, Piscator, Vatablus, Schmidt.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Jacob had hardly left his father, after receiving the blessing ( , was only gone out), when Esau returned and came to Isaac, with the game prepared, to receive the blessing. The shock was inconceivable which Isaac received, when he found that he had blessed another, and not Esau-that, in fact, he had blessed Jacob. At the same time he neither could nor would, either curse him on account of the deception which he had practised, or withdraw the blessing imparted. For he could not help confessing to himself that he had sinned and brought the deception upon himself by his carnal preference for Esau. Moreover, the blessing was not a matter of subjective human affection, but a right entrusted by the grace of God to paternal supremacy and authority, in the exercise of which the person blessing, being impelled and guided by a higher authority, imparted to the person to be blest spiritual possessions and powers, which the will of man could not capriciously withdraw. Regarding this as the meaning of the blessing, Isaac necessarily saw in what had taken place the will of God, which had directed to Jacob the blessing that he had intended for Esau. He therefore said, “ I have blessed him; yea, he will be ( remain) blessed ” (cf. Heb 12:17). Even the great and bitter lamentation into which Esau broke out could not change his father’s mind. To his entreaty in Gen 27:34, “ Bless me, even me also, O my father! ” he replied, “ Thy brother came with subtilty, and hath taken away thy blessing.” Esau answered, “ Is it that ( ) they have named him Jacob (overreacher), and he has overreached me twice? ” i.e., has he received the name Jacob from the fact that he has twice outwitted me? is used “when the cause is not rightly known” (cf. Gen 29:15). To his further entreaty, “Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me?” ( , lit., to lay aside), Isaac repeated the substance of the blessing given to Jacob, and added, “and to thee ( for as in Gen 3:9), now, what can I do, my son? ” When Esau again repeated, with tears, the entreaty that Isaac would bless him also, the father gave him a blessing (Gen 27:39, Gen 27:40), but one which, when compared with the blessing of Jacob, was to be regarded rather as “a modified curse,” and which is not even described as a blessing, but “introduced a disturbing element into Jacob’s blessing, a retribution for the impure means by which he had obtained it.” “ Behold, ” it states, “ from the fat fields of the earth will thy dwelling be, and from the dew of heaven from above.” By a play upon the words Isaac uses the same expression as in Gen 27:28, “from the fat fields of the earth, and from the dew,” but in the opposite sense, being partitive there, and privative here, “from = away from.” The context requires that the words should be taken thus, and not in the sense of “thy dwelling shall partake of the fat of the earth and the dew of heaven” ( Vulg., Luth., etc.).
(Note: I cannot discover, however, in Mal 1:3 an authentic proof of the privative meaning, as Kurtz and Delitzsch do, since the prophet’s words, “I have hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste,” are not descriptive of the natural condition of Idumaea, but of the desolation to which the land was given up.)
Since Isaac said (Gen 27:37) he had given Jacob the blessing of the super-abundance of corn and wine, he could not possibly promise Esau also fat fields and the dew of heaven. Nor would this agree with the words which follows, “ By thy sword wilt thou live.” Moreover, the privative sense of is thoroughly poetical (cf. 2Sa 1:22; Job 11:15, etc.). The idea expressed in the words, therefore, was that the dwelling-place of Esau would be the very opposite of the land of Canaan, viz., an unfruitful land. This is generally the condition of the mountainous country of Edom, which, although not without its fertile slopes and valleys, especially in the eastern portion (cf. Robinson, Pal. ii. p. 552), is thoroughly waste and barren in the western; so that Seetzen says it consists of “the most desolate and barren mountains probably in the world.”
The mode of life and occupation of the inhabitants were adapted to the country. “ By (lit., on) thy sword thou wilt live; ” i.e., thy maintenance will depend on the sword ( as in Deu 8:3 cf. Isa 28:16), “live by war, rapine, and freebooting” ( Knobel). “ And thy brother thou wilt serve; yet it will come to pass, as ( , lit., in proportion as, cf. Num 27:14) thou shakest (tossest), thou wilt break his yoke from thy neck.” , “to rove about” (Jer 2:31; Hos 12:1), Hiphil “to cause (the thoughts) to rove about” (Psa 55:3); but Hengstenberg’s rendering is the best here, viz., “to shake, sc., the yoke.” In the wild, sport-loving Esau there was aptly prefigured the character of his posterity. Josephus describes the Idumaean people as “a tumultuous and disorderly nation, always on the watch on every motion, delighting in mutations” ( Whiston’s tr.: de bell Judg 4; 1:1-21:25; 1). The mental eye of the patriarch discerned in the son his whole future family in its attitude to its brother-nation, and he promised Edom, not freedom from the dominion of Israel (for Esau was to serve his brother, as Jehovah had predicted before their birth), but only a repeated and not unsuccessful struggle for freedom. And so it was; the historical relation of Edom to Israel assumed the form of a constant reiteration of servitude, revolt, and reconquest. After a long period of independence at the first, the Edomites were defeated by Saul (1Sa 14:47) and subjugated by David (2Sa 8:14); and, in spite of an attempt at revolt under Solomon (1Ki 11:14.), they remained subject to the kingdom of Judah until the time of Joram, when they rebelled. They were subdued again by Amaziah (2Ki 14:7; 2Ch 25:11.), and remained in subjection under Uzziah and Jotham (2Ki 14:22; 2Ch 26:2). It was not till the reign of Ahaz that they shook the yoke of Judah entirely off (2Ki 16:6; 2Ch 28:17), without Judah being ever able to reduce them again. At length, however, they were completely conquered by John Hyrcanus about b.c. 129, compelled to submit to circumcision, and incorporated in the Jewish state (Josephus, Ant. xiii. 9, 1, xv. 7, 9). At a still later period, through Antipater and Herod, they established an Idumaean dynasty over Judea, which lasted till the complete dissolution of the Jewish state.
Thus the words of Isaac to his two sons were fulfilled-words which are justly said to have been spoken “in faith concerning things to come” (Heb 11:20). For the blessing was a prophecy, and that not merely in the case of Esau, but in that of Jacob also; although Isaac was deceived with regard to the person of the latter. Jacob remained blessed, therefore, because, according to the predetermination of God, the elder was to serve the younger; but the deceit by which his mother prompted him to secure the blessing was never approved. On the contrary, the sin was followed by immediate punishment. Rebekah was obliged to send her pet son into a foreign land, away from his father’s house, and in an utterly destitute condition. She did not see him for twenty years, even if she lived till his return, and possibly never saw again. Jacob had to atone for his sin against both brother and father by a long and painful exile, in the midst of privation, anxiety, fraud, and want. Isaac was punished for retaining his preference for Esau, in opposition to the revealed will of Jehovah, by the success of Jacob’s stratagem; and Esau for his contempt of the birthright, by the loss of the blessing of the first-born. In this way a higher hand prevailed above the acts of sinful men, bringing the counsel and will of Jehovah to eventual triumph, in opposition to human thought and will.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
| The Blessing Pronounced on Jacob and Esau. | B. C. 1760. |
30 And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting. 31 And he also had made savoury meat, and brought it unto his father, and said unto his father, Let my father arise, and eat of his son’s venison, that thy soul may bless me. 32 And Isaac his father said unto him, Who art thou? And he said, I am thy son, thy firstborn Esau. 33 And Isaac trembled very exceedingly, and said, Who? where is he that hath taken venison, and brought it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? yea, and he shall be blessed. 34 And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, Bless me, even me also, O my father. 35 And he said, Thy brother came with subtlety, and hath taken away thy blessing. 36 And he said, Is not he rightly named Jacob? for he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright; and, behold, now he hath taken away my blessing. And he said, Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? 37 And Isaac answered and said unto Esau, Behold, I have made him thy lord, and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; and with corn and wine have I sustained him: and what shall I do now unto thee, my son? 38 And Esau said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice, and wept. 39 And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above; 40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.
Here is, I. The covenant-blessing denied to Esau. He that made so light of the birthright would now have inherited the blessing, but he was rejected, and found no place of repentance in his father, though he sought it carefully with tears, Heb. xii. 17. Observe, 1. How carefully he sought it. He prepared the savoury meat, as his father had directed him, and then begged the blessing which his father had encouraged him to expect, v. 31. When he understood that Jacob had obtained it surreptitiously, he cried with a great and exceedingly bitter cry, v. 34. No man could have laid the disappointment more to heart than he did; he made his father’s tent to ring with his grief, and again (v. 38) lifted up his voice and wept. Note, The day is coming when those that now make light of the blessings of the covenant, and sell their title to them for a thing of nought, will in vain be importunate for them. Those that will not so much as ask and seek now will knock shortly, and cry, Lord, Lord. Slighters of Christ will then be humble suitors to him. 2. How he was rejected. Isaac, when first made sensible of the imposition that had been practised on him, trembled exceedingly, v. 33. Those that follow the choice of their own affections, rather than the dictates of the divine will, involve themselves in such perplexities as these. But he soon recovers himself, and ratifies the blessing he had given to Jacob: I have blessed him, and he shall be blessed; he might, upon very plausible grounds, have recalled it, but now, at last, he is sensible that he was in an error when he designed it for Esau. Either himself recollecting the divine oracle, or rather having found himself more than ordinarily filled with the Holy Ghost when he gave the blessing to Jacob, he perceived that God did, as it were, say Amen to it. Now, (1.) Jacob was hereby confirmed in his possession of the blessing, and abundantly satisfied of the validity of it, though he obtained it fraudulently; hence too he had reason to hope that God graciously overlooked and pardoned his misconduct. (2.) Isaac hereby acquiesced in the will of God, though it contradicted his own expectations and affection. He had a mind to give Esau the blessing, but, when he perceived the will of God was otherwise, he submitted; and this he did by faith (Heb. xi. 20), as Abraham before him, when he had solicited for Ishmael. May not God do what he will with his own? (3.) Esau hereby was cut off from the expectation of that special blessing which he thought to have preserved to himself when he sold his birthright. We, by this instance, are taught, [1.] That it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy, Rom. ix. 16. The apostle seems to allude to this story. Esau had a good will to the blessing, and ran for it; but God that showed mercy designed it for Jacob, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, v. 11. The Jews, like Esau, hunted after the law of righteousness (v. 31), yet missed of the blessing of righteousness, because they sought it by the works of the law (v. 32); while the Gentiles, who, like Jacob, sought it by faith in the oracle of God, obtained it by force, with that violence which the kingdom of heaven suffers. See Matt. xi. 12. [2.] That those who undervalue their spiritual birthright, and can afford to sell it for a morsel of meat, forfeit spiritual blessings, and it is just with God to deny them those favours they were careless of. Those that will part with their wisdom and grace, with their faith and a good conscience, for the honours, wealth, or pleasures, of this world, however they may pretend a zeal for the blessing, have already judged themselves unworthy of it, and so shall their doom be. [3.] That those who lift up hands in wrath lift them up in vain. Esau, instead of repenting of his own folly, reproached his brother, unjustly charged him with taking away the birthright which he had fairly sold to him (v. 36), and conceived malice against him for what he had now done, v. 41. Those are not likely to speed in prayer who turn those resentments upon their brethren which they should turn upon themselves, and lay the blame of their miscarriages upon others, when they should take shame to themselves. [4.] That those who seek not till it is too late will be rejected. This was the ruin of Esau, he did not come in time. As there is an accepted time, a time when God will be found, so there is a time when he will not answer those that call upon him, because they neglected the appointed season. See Prov. i. 28. The time of God’s patience and our probation will not last always; the day of grace will come to an end, and the door will be shut. Then many that now despise the blessing will seek it carefully; for then they will know how to value it, and will see themselves undone, for ever undone, without it, but to no purpose, Luke xiii. 25-27. O that we would therefore, in this our day, know the things that belong to our peace!
II. Here is a common blessing bestowed upon Esau.
1. This he desired: Bless me also, v. 34. Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? v. 36. Note, (1.) The worst of men know how to wish well to themselves; and even those who profanely sell their birthright seem piously to desire the blessing. Faint desires of happiness, without a right choice of the end and a right use of the means, deceive many into their own ruin. Multitudes go to hell with their mouths full of good wishes. The desire of the slothful and unbelieving kills them. Many will seek to enter in, as Esau, who shall not be able, because they do not strive, Luke xiii. 24. (2.) It is the folly of most men that they are willing to take up with any good (Ps. iv. 6), as Esau here, who desired but a second-rate blessing, a blessing separated from the birthright. Profane hearts think any blessing as good as that from God’s oracle: Hast thou but one? As if he had said, “I will take up with any: though I have not the blessing of the church, yet let me have some blessing.”
2. This he had; and let him make his best of it, Gen 27:39; Gen 27:40.
(1.) It was a good thing, and better than he deserved. It was promised him, [1.] That he should have a competent livelihood–the fatness of the earth, and the dew of heaven. Note, Those that come short of the blessings of the covenant may yet have a very good share of outward blessings. God gives good ground and good weather to many that reject his covenant, and have no part nor lot in it. [2.] That by degrees he should recover his liberty. If Jacob must rule (v. 29), Esau must serve; but he has this to comfort him, he shall live by his sword. He shall serve, but he shall not starve; and, at length, after much skirmishing, he shall break the yoke of bondage, and wear marks of freedom. This was fulfilled (2Ki 8:20; 2Ki 8:22) when the Edomites revolted.
(2.) Yet it was far short of Jacob’s blessing. For him God had reserved some better thing. [1.] In Jacob’s blessing the dew of heaven is put first, as that which he most valued, and desired, and depended upon; in Esau’s the fatness of the earth is put first, for it was this that he had the first and principal regard to. [2.] Esau has these, but Jacob has them from God’s hand: God give thee the dew of heaven, v. 28. It was enough to Esau to have the possession; but Jacob desired it by promise, and to have it from covenant-love. [3.] Jacob shall have dominion over his brethren: hence the Israelites often ruled over the Edomites. Esau shall have dominion, that is, he shall gain some power and interest, but shall never have dominion over his brother: we never find that the Jews were sold into the hands of the Edomites, or that they oppressed them. But the great difference in that there is nothing in Esau’s blessing that points at Christ, nothing that brings him or his into the church and covenant of God, without which the fatness of the earth, and the plunder of the field, will stand him in little stead. Thus Isaac by faith blessed them both according as their lot should be. Some observe that Jacob was blessed with a kiss (v. 27), so was not Esau.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Verses 30-40:
Jacob had scarcely left Isaac’s presence when Esau came in with the tasty meal he had prepared for his father. Isaac was terrified when he realized what had happened. This may have been in part as he realized how near he had come to violating the Divine mandate to confer the Covenant Blessing upon Jacob.
Esau was enraged over his brother’s deception. His character surfaces in his attempt to place all the blame upon Jacob and deny his own guilt. He had voluntarily surrendered his birthright, bartering it for a mess of pottage. He esteemed it of little or no value (see Heb 12:14-17). The implication is that he placed little value upon the Covenant Blessing, as well. He was unrepentant, unwilling to accept his own guilt, and had no real appreciation for spiritual values. It was these character traits which made him unfit for the Covenant Blessing.
The entire matter was of God. He knew beforehand what Esau would do, and the kind of character he was. His foreknowledge did not make it so – He knew it because it was so. The choice was Esau’s. He esteemed of no value the spiritual blessings inherent in the Abrahamic Covenant. This made him unfit for the material blessings that go with it. The same principle holds true today.
Conferring of the Abrahamic Covenant Blessing was unconditional, and irrevocable. Isaac was unable to recall what he had conferred upon Jacob, even though he was deceived.
Esau was filled with bitter remorse, not genuine repentance. He pleaded with Isaac for a blessing. And though the Abrahamic Covenant Blessing was not to be given, there was still a blessing for Esau. He would be given a choice inheritance; he would be successful in war; and he would eventually break the yoke of his brother’s authority over his neck. All these prophetic blessings came to pass, just as Isaac promised.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
30. Jacob was yet scarce gone out. Here is added the manner in which Esau was repulsed, which circumstance availed not a little to confirm the benediction to Jacob: for if Esau had not been rejected, it might seem that he was not deprived of that honor which nature had given him: but now Isaac declares, that what he had done, in virtue of his patriarchal office, could not but be ratified. Here, truly, it again appears, that the primogeniture which Jacob obtained, at the expense of his brother, was made his by a free gift; for if we compare the works of both together, Esau obeys his father, brings him the produce of his hunting, prepares for his father the food obtained by his own labor, and speaks nothing but the truth: in short, we find nothing in him which is not worthy of praise. Jacob never leaves his home, substitutes a kid for venison, insinuates himself by many lies, brings nothing which would properly commend him, but in many things deserves reprehension. Hence it must be acknowledged, that the cause of this event is not to be traced to works, but that it lies hid in the eternal counsel of God. Yet Esau is not unjustly reprobated, because they who are not governed by the Spirit of God can receive nothing with a right mind; only let it be firmly maintained, that since the condition of all is equal, if any one is preferred to another, it is not because of his own merit, but because the Lord has gratuitously elected him.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
CRITICAL NOTES.
Gen. 27:39. Thy dwelling shall be of the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above.] The preposition is here used in a privative sense, apart from the fatness of the earth, etc. The opening words most likely signify the very contrary of that by which the A. V. renders them. Esau was to dwell in the barren land of Idumea, far off from the fertility of his brothers lot. Travellers say that Edom is probably the most desolate and barren upland in the world. No words could more accurately describe the habits of its inhabitants than those of living by their sword, existing as robbers and free-booters. (Alford.)
Gen. 27:40. And it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.] The Edomites were to be subjugated by Israel, but would in time assert their liberty and succeed in shaking off the yoke. This they did in the reign of Joram. (2Ki. 8:20.) They were brought under again by Amaziahs. (2Ki. 14:7; 2Ch. 25:11.) In the latter days of the kingdom of Judah the Edomites were a cause of annoyance. (2Ch. 28:17.) (Alford.)
MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.Gen. 27:30-40
ESAU DISAPPOINTED OF HIS BLESSING
I. He is overwhelmed by a heart-rending sorrow. He had procured the savoury meat, brought it to his father, and prepared himself to receive the coveted blessing. When he found that his brother had already secured that blessing by treachery, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, Bless me, even me also, O my father. His grief is so sudden and overwhelming that he cannot take in all the sad facts of his position. He vaguely hopes that there is some way of escape from the difficulty. Surely some blessing, at all risks, must be reserved for him!
II. He refers his wrongs to their true author. His brother Jacob, who had taken away his birthright, had now taken away his blessing. (Gen. 27:36.) It is true that Esau had freely bartered his birthright for pottage, still the transaction was wrong, for Jacob took advantage of his brothers necessity. Poor Esau felt that he was the victim of a well-known and practiced deceiver.
III. He pleads pathetically with his father. And he said, Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? He felt that there must be some help for himsome depths of resource in his fathers heart which were still untried. This feeling is almost akin to that faith which is not daunted by impossibilities, and even hopes against hope.
IV. He is contented with an inferior blessing. The superior blessing had already been pronounced upon another, and was irrevocable. Yea, and he shall be blessed, said his father. Esau cannot now expect the highest blessing. He might have the crumbs from the table, but not the childrens bread. The blessing pronounced upon him by his father included many things good in themselves, but the highest and best things are absent. He was promised increase, prosperity, pre-eminence, and renown in war. But with this should be mingled the bitter portion of servitude to his brother. He would sometimes get the dominion and break the yoke from off his neck, but he would have only a brief victory, and must return again to subjection. (Gen. 27:39-40.) At best, the portion of Esau can only be described as Gods blessings without God. Nothing of heaven enters into it.
SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS ON THE VERSES
Gen. 27:30-32. Esau prepared the dish and brought it to his father, and claimed the blessing in very similar terms to those used by Jacob. Esau must have remembered how he had parted with his birthright to Jacob, and therefore in his conscience he could not be entirely unprepared for the discovery of his loss. Esau is too late. Isaac must have been smitten with a sense of his own sin in his carnal preference for Esau, contrary to all indications of the Divine pleasure. He felt, too, that this patriarchal blessing was as the Divine direction and not from any personal preference, and he found himself strangely controlled and overruled by the Divine hand.(Jacobus.)
Gen. 27:33. His emotions were absolutely overwhelming. On the one hand, he could not but feel a degree of just indignation in view of the imposition which had been practised upon him, especially when he remembered the precautions he had taken against being thus deceived; yet, on the other, a moments reflection would convince him that the transfer of the blessing must have been of the Lord, and, consequently, that he had been all along acting against His will in trying to have it otherwise. Two such considerations rushing on his mind at once, like two impetuous counter-currents coming together, sufficiently account for his feelings, especially when we add his consciousness of the irrevocable nature of the blessing, and the momentous consequences annexed to it. But while he resents the subtlety of Jacob, and the unkindness of Rebekah, he acknowledges and acquiesces in the will of God. The blessing which he had unwittingly pronounced, and which he knows to be irrevocable, he deliberately and solemnly confirms: I have blessed him, yea, and he shall be blessed. His feelings would, perhaps, not be inaptly expressed by the language of Balaam, God is not a man that he should lie, etc. (Num. 33:19-20). Hence the Apostle tells us, that Esau found no place for repentance, though he sought it carefully with tearsthat is, he found no place for repentance, or change of purpose, in his father, He could not prevail upon him to reverse the word that had proceeded from his lips.(Bush.)
If anything can excuse a departure from a promise, Isaac might have been excused in this case; for in truth he did not promise to Jacob, though Jacob stood before him. He honestly thought that he was speaking to his first-born; and yet, perhaps partly taught to be punctiliously scrupulous by the rebuke he had received in early life from Abimilech, partly feeling that he had been but an instrument in Gods hands, he felt that a mysterious and irrevocable sacredness belonged to his word once passed; and said, Yea, and he shall be blessed. Jesuitism amongst us has begun to tamper with the sacredness of a promise. Men change their creed, and fancy themselves absolved from past promises; the member of the Church of Rome is no longer bound to do what the member of the Church of England stipulated. Just as well might the king refuse to perform the promises or pay the debts of the prince whom he once was. Therefore, let us ponder over such texts as these. Be careful and cautious of pledging yourself to anything; but the money you have once promised, the offer you have once made is irrevocable, it is no longer yours, it is passed from you as much as if it had been given.(Robertson.)
Though the words and actions of the parties in this transaction were built upon a falsehood, yet a true blessing was obtained. Through all the evil purposes and schemes of men God works out his great designs.
He trembled from the vivid apprehension suddenly flashing across his mind of the Lords presence and the Lords power, and not from anger, or anxiety, or terror, or blank dismay; though such emotions might well agitate his bosom. He had a startling sense of the interposition of that God without whose warrant he had set himself to perform the solemn prophetic act that was to close his patriarchal ministry, and against whose open and revealed will he had been, so far as his own intention could go, actually performing it. His whole frame receives a shock. The scales fell from his eyesthe eyes of his soul that had been blinded even more than the dim eyes of his body. He awakens as out of a sleep, and feels that surely the Lord is here, though he knew it not.(Candlish.)
Gen. 27:34. When Esau sold his birthright he did not then know what he had lost, but now it is all brought home to him. Those who choose the present world for their portion and spurn the offer of eternal life do not know what they lose, but the time must come when they shall know to their sorrow.
Vengeance wakes up suddenly to startle men when the sin which brought it has been long forgotten.
Why did he not rather weep to his brother for the pottage than to Isaac for a blessing? If he had not then sold, he had not needed now to buy. It is just with God to deny us those favours which we were careless in keeping, and which we undervalued in enjoying. How happy a thing is it to know the seasons of grace, and not to neglect them! How desperate to have known and neglected them! These tears are both late and false.(Bp. Hall.)
In the midst of all his regrets there was no real contrition, no godly sorrow at heart, but only disappointment and vexation at his loss. We find at the time no self-condemnation, no confession of his sin; but only a severe accusation of his brother, as if he only were to blame for what had happened. Neither does he give any evidence of having been a true penitent afterwards, for his heart was evidently full of rage and enmity towards his brother, under the influence of which he determines, on a fit opportunity, to put an end to his life. All this shows a state of mind at the widest possible remove from sincere repentance.(Bush.)
He cried not for his sin in selling the birthright, but for his loss in missing the blessing; though having sold the birthright, he had no right to the blessing. This is the guise of the ungoldly. He cries, Perrii, not Peccavi. If he howl upon his bed (Hos. 7:14), it is for corn and oil, as a dog tied up howls for his dinner. It never troubles him that a good God is offended, which to an honest heart is the prime cause of the greatest sorrow.(Trapp.)
The sinner cut off from the privileges of the Church can yet claim God as his Father. Repentance and prayer, and a way of return are still left to him.
Gen. 27:35-36. It cannot be denied that there was some ground for the reflections thus cast upon Jacob. He had, indeed, acted the part of a supplanter in a way altogether unjustifiable; still the statement was exaggerated. Esau was not warranted in saying, He took away my birthright, as though he robbed him of it, for the surrender was his own voluntary act. He parted with it because he practically depised it. But it is no unusual thing for men to act as if accusing others were the most effectual mode of justifying themselves.(Bush.)
Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? is a prayer which those who have despised their birthright, and justly forfeited it, may still address to the Infinite Father.
Gen. 27:37. Isaac, in using this language is not to be considered as giving vent to a self-sufficient or self-complacent spirit, it is the ordinary prophetic style. Men speaking by inspiration are often said to do that which they merely announce shall be done.(Bush.)
Gen. 27:38. These words, taken by themselves, without reference to the character of him who spoke them, are neither good nor evil. Had Esau only meant this: God has many blessings, of various kinds; and looking round the circle of my resources I perceive a principle of compensation, so that what I lose in one department I gain in some other; I will be content to take a second blessing when I cannot have the first: Esau would have said nothing which was not praiseworthy and religious. He would only have expressed what the Syro-Phnician woman did, who observed that though in this world some have the advantages of children, whereas others are as little favoured as dogs, yet that the dogs have the compensatory crumbs. Superior advantages do not carry salvation nor moral superiority with them, necessarily; nor do inferior ones carry reprobation. But it was not in this spirit at all that Esau spoke. His was the complaining spirit of the man who repines because others are more favoured than he, the spirit of the elder son in the parable, thou never gavest me a kid. This character transformed outward disadvantages into a real curse. For, again I say, disadvantages are in themselves only a means to more lustrous excellence. But if to inferior talents we add sloth, and to poverty envy and discontent, and to weakened health querulousness, then we have indeed ourselves converted non-election into reprobation; and we are doubly cursed, cursed by inward as well as outward inferiority(Robertson.)
Gen. 27:39-40. At length in reply to the weeping suppliant, he bestows upon him a characteristic blessing. The preposition is the same as in the blessing of Jacob. But there, after a verb of giving it had a partitive sense; here, after a noun of place, it denotes distance or separation (for example, Pro. 20:3). The pastoral life has been distasteful to Esau, and so it shall be with his race. The land of Edom was accordingly a comparative wilderness (Mal. 1:3).(Murphy.)
In this double blessing, of course the destinies of Israel and Edom are prefigured rather than the personal history of Jacob and Esau. For the predicted liberty of Edom, the breaking the yoke off the neck, did not take place till the reign of Jehoram, long after Esaus death (2Ki. 8:22). So that when it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated, the selection of nations to outward privileges is meant, not the irrespective election of individuals to eternal life. In these blessings we have the principle of prophecy. We cannot suppose that the Jacob here spoken of as blessed was unmixedly good, nor the Esau unmixedly evil. Nor can we imagine that idolatrous Israel was that in which all the promises of God found their end, or that Edom was the nation on whom the curse of God fell unmixed with any blessing. Prophecy takes individuals and nations as representations for the time being of principles which they only partially represent. They are the basis or substratum of an idea. For instance, Jacob, or Israel, represents the principle of good, the Church of God, the triumphant and blessed principle. To that, the typical Israel, the promises are made; to the literal Jacob or Israel, only as the type of this and so far as the nation actually was what it stood for. Esau is the worldly man, representing for the time the world. To that the rejection belongs, to the literal Esau only so far as is he that. In prophecies therefore, such as these, we are dealing much more with the ideas of which such persons and nations are the type than with the persons or nations themselves.(Robertson.)
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
‘And it happened, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting. And he also made savoury meat, and brought it to his father.’
He left only just in time. Esau, confident of the benefits he is about to receive, arrives back at the camp and prepares the food for his father. Then he confidently strides into his father’s tent. He is not too concerned about the fact that the blessing may counteract the oath he had made to Jacob. Once the blessing is given it cannot be taken away.
Gen 27:31 b
‘And he said to his father, “Let my father arise and eat of his son’ s venison, that your soul may bless me.’
Compare the similar words in verse 19. This was clearly the regular formula for opening the blessing procedures.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Esau Returns and Receives the Younger Son’s Blessing
v. 30. And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac, his father, that Esau, his brother, came in from his hunting. v. 31. And he also had made savory meat, and brought it unto his father, and said unto his father, Let my father arise, and eat of his son’s venison that thy soul may bless me. v. 32. And Isaac, his father, said unto him, Who art thou? And he said, I am thy son, thy first-born, Esau.
v. 33. And Isaac trembled very exceedingly, and said, Who? Where is he that hath taken venison, and brought it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? Yea, and he shall be blessed. v. 34. And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, Bless me, even me also, O my father. v. 35. And he said, Thy brother came with subtlety, and hath taken away thy blessing. v. 36. And he said, Is not he rightly named Jacob v. 37. And Isaac answered and said unto Esau, Behold, I have made him thy lord, and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; and with corn and wine have I sustained him; and what shall I do now unto thee, my son? v. 38. And Esau said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice and wept. v. 39. And Isaac, his father, answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be of the fatness of the earth and of the dew of heaven from above. v. 40. And by thy sword shalt thou live,
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
EXPOSITION
Gen 27:30
And it came to pass (literally, and it was), as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone outliterally, and it was (sc. as soon as, or when) Jacob only going forth had gone; i.e. had just gone out (Ewald, Keil), rather than was in the act of coming out (Murphy), since the narrative implies that the brothers did not meet on this occasionfrom the presence of Isaac his father, that (literally, and) Esau his brother came in from his hunting.
Gen 27:31
And he also had made savory meat (vide Gen 27:4), and brought it unto his father, and said unto him, Let my father arise, and eat of his son’s venisoncompared with Jacob’s exhortation to his aged parent (Gen 27:19), the language of Esau has, if anything, more affection in its tonesthat thy soul may bless me. Esau was at this time a man of mature age, being either fifty-seven or seventy-seven years old, and must have been acquainted with the heavenly oracle (Gen 25:23) that assigned the precedence in the theocratic line to Jacob. Zither, therefore, he must have supposed that his claim to the blessing was not thereby affected, or he was guilty of conniving at Isaac’s scheme for resisting the Divine will. Indignation at Jacob’s duplicity and baseness, combined with sympathy for Esau in his supposed wrongs, sometimes prevents a just appreciation of the exact position occupied by the latter in this extraordinary transaction. Instead of branding Jacob as a shameless deceiver, and hurling against his fair fame the most opprobrious epithets, may it not be that, remembering the previously-expressed will of Heaven, the real supplanter was Esau, who as an accomplice of his father was seeking secretly, unlawfully, and feloniously to appropriate to himself a blessing which had already been, not obscurely, designated as Jacob’s? On this hypothesis the miserable craft of Jacob and Rebekah was a lighter crime than that of Isaac and Esau.
Gen 27:32
And Isaac his father said unto him, Who art thou? The language indicates the patriarch’s surprise. And he said, I am thy son, thy firstborn Esau. The emphatic tone of Esau’s answer may have been dictated by a suspicion, already awakened by Isaac’s question, that all was not right (Inglis). Esau’s claim to be regarded as Isaac’s firstborn, after having bartered away his birthright, is considered by some to be unwarranted (Wordsworth); but it is doubtful if Esau attached the importance to the term “firstborn” which this objection presupposes.
Gen 27:33
And Isaac trembled very exceedingly,literally, feared a great fear, to a great degree; shuddered in great terror above measure (Lange). The renderings (LXX.), Expavit stupors, et ultra quam credi potest admirans (Vulgate), “wondered with an exceedingly great admiration” (Onkelos), emphasize the patriarch’s astonishment, the first even suggesting the idea of a trance or supernatural elevation of the prophetic consciousness; whereas that which is depicted is rather the alarm produced within the patriarch’s breast, not so much by the discovery that his plan had been defeated by a woman’s wit and a son’s craftthese would have kindled indignation rather than fearas by the awakening conviction not that he had blessed, but that he had been seeking to bless, the wrong person (Calvin, Willet)and said, Who? where is hequis est et ubi est? (Jarchi); but rather, who then is he? (Rosenmller, Kalisch, Lange)that hath taken venison,literally, the one hunting preythat hunted, or has hunted, the part having the force of a perfectand brought it me, And I have eaten of all before thou earnest, and have blessed him? yea, and he shall be blessedthus before Jacob is named he pronounces the Divine sentence that the blessing is irrevocable (Lange).
Gen 27:34
And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cryliterally, he cried a cry, great and bitter exceedingly; expressive of the poignant anguish of his soul (Kalisch, Bush), if not also of his rage against his brother (Philo, Eusebius), of his envy of the blessing (Menochius, Lapide), and of the desperation of his spirit (Calvin). Cf. Heb 12:17and said unto his father, Bless me, even me also, O my father. A proof of Esau’s blind incredulity in imagining it to be within his father’s power to impart benedictions promiscuously without and beyond the Divine sanction (Calvin); a sign that he supposed the theocratic blessing capable of division, and as dependent upon his lamentations and prayers as upon the caprice of his father (Lange); an evidence that “now at last he had learned in some measure adequately to value” the birthing? (Candlish); but if so it was post horam.
Gen 27:35
And he (i.e. Isaac) said, Thy brother came with subtlety,with wisdom (Onkelos); rather with fraud, (LXX.)and hath taken away thy blessingi.e. the blessing which I thought was thine, since Isaac now understood that from the first it had been designed for Jacob.
Gen 27:36
And he (Esau) said, Is he not rightly named Jacob?literally, is it that one has called ha name Jacob? being employed when the reason is unknown. On the meaning of Jacob cf. Gen 25:26for (literally, and) he hath supplanted me (a paronomasia on the word Jacob) these two timesor, already twice; being used adverbially in the sense of now. The precise import of Esau’s exclamation has been rendered, “Has he not been justly (, LXX.; juste, Vulgate; rightly, A.V.) named Supplanter from supplanting?” (Rosenmller). “Is it because he was named Jacob that he hath now twice supplanted me?” (Ainsworth, Bush). “Has he received the name Jacob from the fact that he has twice outwitted me?” (Keil). “Shall he get the advantage of me because he was rims inadvertently named Jacob?” (Lange). “Has in truth his name been called Jacob?” (Kalisch). All agree in bringing out that Esau designed to indicate a correspondence between Jacob’s name and Jacob’s practice. He took away my birthright;this was scarcely correct, since Esau voluntarily sold it (Gen 25:33)and, behold, now he hath taken away my blessing. Neither was this exactly accurate, since the blessing did not originally belong to Esau, however he may have imagined that it did. And he said, Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? The question indicates that Esau had no proper conception of the spiritual character of the blessing which his brother had obtained.
Gen 27:37
And Isaac answered and said unto Esau (repeating the substance of the Messing already conferred on Jacob), Behold, I have made him thy lord,literally, behold, a lord (vide on Gen 27:29) have I constituted him to thee; Isaac hereby intimating that in pronouncing the words of blessing he had been speaking under a celestial impulse, and therefore with absolute authorityand all his brethren have I given to him for servants (for the fulfillment vide 2Sa 8:14), and with corn and wine have I sustained him:i.e. declared that by these he shall be sustained or supported (cf. Gen 27:28)and what shall I do now unto thee, my son?
Gen 27:38
And ESAU said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? Not as desiring either the reversal of the patriarchal sentence upon Jacob, which he appears to have understood to be irrevocable, or an extension of its gracious provisions, so as to include him as well as Jacob; but as soliciting such a benediction as would place him, at least in respect of temporalities, on a level with the favorite of Rebekah, either because he did not recognize the spiritual character of the covenant blessing, or because, though recognizing it, he was willing to let it go. Bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice, and wept (cf. Heb 12:17). “Those tear expressed, indeed, sorrow for his forfeiture, but not for the sinful levity by which it had been incurred. They were ineffectual (i.e. they did not lead to genuine repentance) because Esau was incapable of true repentance” (vide Delitzsch on Heb 12:17).
Gen 27:39
And Isaac his father (moved by the tearful earnestness of Esau) answered and said unto him,still speaking under inspiration, though it is doubtful whether what he spoke was a real, or only an apparent, blessing(vide infra)Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above. Literally, from () the fatnesses (or fat places) of the earth, and from the dew of area; a substantial repetition of the temporal blessing bestowed on Jacob (Gen 27:28), with certain important variations, such as the omission of plenty of corn and wine at the close, and of the name of Elohim at the commencement, of the benediction (Vulgate, Luther, Calvin, Ainsworth, Rosenmller, ‘Speaker’s Commentary’); though, by assigning to the preposition a privative rather than a partitive sense, it is readily transformed into “a modified curse”behold, away from the fatnesses o/the earth, &c; shall thy dwelling be, meaning that, in contrast to the land of Canaan, the descendants of Esau should be located in a sterile region (Tuch, Knobel, Kurtz, Delitzseh, Keil, Kalisch, Murphy). In support of this latter rendering it is urged
(1) that it is grammatically admissible;
(2) that it corresponds with the present aspect of Idumaea, which is “on the whole a dreary and unproductive land;”
(3) that it agrees with the preceding statement that every blessing had already been bestowed upon Jacob; and
(4) that it explains the play upon the words “fatness” and “dew,” which are hero chosen to describe a state of matter exactly the opposite to that which was declared to be the lot of Jacob. On the other hand, it is felt to be somewhat arbitrary to assign to the preposition a partitive sense in Gen 27:28 and a privative in Gen 27:39. Though called in later times (Mal 1:3) a waste and desolate region, it may not have been originally so, or only in comparison with Canaan; while according to modern travelers the glens and mountain terraces of Edom, covered with rich soil, only want an industrious population to convert the entire region into “one of the wealthiest, as it is one of the most picturesque, countries in the world.”
Gen 27:40
And by thy sword shalt thou live,literally, upon thy sword shalt thou be, i.e. thy maintenance shall depend on thy sword; a prediction that Esau’s descendants should be a warlike and tumultuous people of predatory habits (cf. Josephus, B. 1; 4. 4)and shalt serve thy brother;a prediction afterwards fulfilled (of. 1Sa 14:47; 2Sa 8:14; 1Ki 11:16; 2Ki 14:7-10; 2Ch 20:22-25)and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck. The verb , used of beasts which have broken the yoke and wander freely about (Gesenius, Furst), appear to hint at an incessant restlessness on the part of Edom while under Israel’s yoke which should eventually terminate in regaining their independence. The exact rendering of the clause is obscure, but perhaps means that when Edom should roam about as a freebooter (Lange), or should revolt (Alford), or should toss, shake, or struggle against the yoke (Vulgate, Keil, Hengstenberg, ‘Speaker’s Commentary), he should succeed. Other renderings are, when thou shalt bear rule (Kimchi), when thou shalt repent (Jarchi), when thou shalt be strong (Samaritan), when thou prevailest (Murphy), when thou shalt truly desire it (Kalisch), when thou shalt pull down (LXX.); because thou art restless (Havernick).
HOMILETICS
Gen 27:30-40
The stolen blessing: a domestic drama.-3. Isaac and Esau, or the hunter’s lamentation.
I. Isaac’s STARTLING DISCOVERY.
1. Unexpectedly made. The return of Esau from the hunting-field with a dish of venison was a sudden and most unpleasant revelation to the aged patriarch, showing that in some inexplicable manner he had been out-maneuvered, and, as it were, constrained against his will to bestow the blessing upon Jacob. So in common life it is not infrequently seen that the unexpected is that which happens, that wicked schemes prove abortive, that the deceiver is himself deceived”the engineer hoist on his own petard,”and that men are often made the involuntary and unconscious instruments of furthering the will of Heaven.
2. Tremblingly received. Apprehending what had taken place, the blind old invalid “feared a great fear exceedingly,” saddened with an inward horror, not through disappointment at the failure of his scheme, or indignation at the wicked craft and heartless duplicity of Rebekah’s favorite, but alarm at his own sinful intention which God had thus manifestly seen and thwarted. It is well when the soul trembles at a discovery of its own wickedness. Gracious souls dread nothing “Thy more than standing on the verge of sin.”
3. Pathetically acknowledged. Thy brother came with subtlety, and hath taken away thy blessing;” and, “I have blessed him: yea, and he shall be blessed.” It becomes parents to commiserate their children’s misfortunes, and especially to sorrow if they miss the blessings of salvation. They who lack these, even when they do not wish to obtain them, are objects of profoundest pity.
4. Meekly acquiesced in. Recognizing the hand of God in the remarkable transaction in which he had been an actor, with true humility and faith the venerable patriarch bowed before the will of the Supreme. Neither Esau’s prayers and tears, nor his own paternal affections, could stimulate so much as a wish to undo what had been done. To a truly pious heart the will of God is final. “Thy will be done” is the language of faith.
II. ESAU‘S SINGULAR BEHAVIOUR.
1. His bitter lamentation for himself. Esau’s “great and exceeding bitter cry” was expressive not of heartfelt grief for his sinful levity in parting with the birthright, or guileful behavior in attempting to secure the blessing; but
(1) of deep mortification at being over-reached by his crafty brother;
(2) of remorseful chagrin at not recovering the blessing he had practically surrendered in the sale of the birthright;
(3) of earnest desire to induce Isaac to revoke the words he had spoken. The repentance which he sought carefully with tears (Heb 12:17) was not his own change of heart, but his father’s change of mind.
2. His wrathful indignation against his brother. “Is he not rightly named Jacob for he hath supplanted me these two times. A statement not quite accurate; but angry men are seldom remarkable for accuracy of statement; a statement also expressive of hatred against Jacob, and incensed brothers often call each other bad names. Good men should be angry and sin not. Indignation, even when righteous, should be restrained.
3. His tearful request to his father. “Bless me, me also, O my father!” Having lost the blessing of the covenant, he was still desirous of possessing some sort of blessing. Wicked men often covet the material advantages of religion who have no desire to share in its spiritual enrichments.
III. ISAAC‘S SOLEMN DECLARATION.
1. Of Esau‘s subjection to Jacob. “Behold, I have made him thy lord.” A prediction of
(1) political subordination, afterwards fulfilled in the conquests of Israel; and
(2) of possible salvation to Esau and his descendants through believing recognition of the spiritual ascendancy of Jacob and his seed.
2. Of Esau‘s portion from God.
(1) A fat soil. God appoints to all men, individuals and nations, the bounds of their habitation. Inhabitants of fertile regions have a special call to thankfulness.
(2) A roving life. Though the warlike character of Esau’s descendants was of God’s appointment and permission, it is no just inference that savage tribes are as useful as those of settled and improved habits, or that God does not desire the diffusion of civilization and the elevation of the race.
(3) Ultimate independence. Though some nations have been placed in subjection, it is God’s will that all should aspire to freedom. Revolt, rebellion, insurrection are sometimes a people’s highest duty. Lessons:
1. The blessing of the covenant is not of him that willeth or of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.
2. Those who despise God’s salvation in youth cannot always obtain it in manhood or age.
3. Those who finally come short of eternal life will have no one to blame but themselves.
4. No one need sue in vain for Heaven’s favor, since the blessing is not now for one, but for all.
5. There is a difference between penitence and remorse.
6. Though no man can hope to change the mind of God, it is within the power of all men to desire and to effect a change upon their own hearts.
7. The prediction of a nation’s or a person’s future does not interfere with the free operation of the human will
HOMILIES BY R.A. REDFORD
Gen 27:33
Jacob’s deceit, Esau supplanted.
In this familiar narrative the following points may be distinguished:
I. ISAAC‘S ERRORconnecting a solemn blessing with mere gratification of the senses, neglect of the Divine word, favoritism towards the son less worthy.
II. JACOB‘S SUBTILTY and selfishness. The birthright had been sold to him; he might have obtained the blessing by fair agreement. His fear of Esau lay at the root of his deceit. One sin leads on to another. Those who entangle themselves with the world are involved more and more in moral evil.
III. REBEKAH‘S AFFECTION was perverted into unmotherly partiality and unwifely treachery to Isaac. The son’s guilt rested much on the mother’s shoulders, for she laid the plot and prepared the execution of it. All were sad examples of self-assertion destroying the simplicity of faith. And yet
IV. THE COVENANT GOD over-rules the weakness and error of his people. The blessing was appointed for Jacob. Although pronounced by an instrument blind, foolish, sinful, deceived, it yet is the blessing, which, having been lodged in Isaac, must pass on to the true heir of Isaac, who, according to the promise and prediction, is Jacob.
V. The lower character and standing of Esau and his inferior blessing represents the distinction between THE CHOSEN PEOPLE AND THOSE WHO, WHILE NOT INCLUDED IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF ISRAEL, may yet by connection and intercourse with it derive some portion of the Divine benediction from it. Both in pre-Christian and Christian times there have been nations thus situated.
VI. The LATE REPENTANCE Of the supplanted Esau. He found no possibility of averting the consequences of his own error (Heb 12:17), no place where repentance would avail to recover that which was lost. The “great and exceeding bitter cry” only reveals the shame, the blessing taken away. Those who, like Esau, despise their place in the family of God are driven out into the fierce opposition of the world; “by their sword” they must live and “serve their brethren.”
VII. THE END OF DECEIT IS HATRED, passion, fear, flight, individual and family disorder and suffering. Yet again the merciful hand interposes to over-rule the errors of man. Jacob’s flight from Esau’s hatred is his preservation from ungodly alliance with heathen neighbors, and the commencement of a wholesome course of discipline by which his character was purged of much of its evil, and his faith deepened and developedR.
HOMILIES BY J.F. MONTGOMERY
Gen 27:36
Unfaithfulness in believers.
“Is not he rightly named Jacob?” Jacob, Israelhow widely different the thoughts suggested by the two names. Both tell of success. But one is the man of craft, who takes by the heel to trip up. The other, as a prince of God (cf. Luk 1:15), prevails through believing prayer. Yet Jacob became Israel, and Israel had once been Jacob. The plant of faith has often to struggle through a hard soil. To understand the lessons of his life, remember
1. In contrast to Esau, he was a man of faith. His desire was for a future and spiritual blessing. He believed that it was to be his, and that belief influenced his life. But
2. His faith was imperfect and partial in its operation, and this led to inconsistencies (cf. Mat 14:29, Mat 14:30; Gal 2:12). Naturally quiet, his life was passed chiefly at home. Godly influences undisturbed by outward life taught him to worship God, and to prize his promise. But he had not proved his armor (cf. 1Co 10:12); and, as often happens,- the object of his faith was the means of his trial. His father’s purpose in favor of Esau shook his faith (cf. 1Pe 4:18). He yielded to the suggestion to obtain by deceit what God had promised to give (Isa 49:1), and earned his brother’s taunt, “Is not he rightly named Jacob?” Yet it does not appear that he was conscious of having failed in faith. Consider
I. THE DANGER OF SELF–DECEIVING (cf. Eze 13:10). One brought up among godly influences may seem to possess faith. Ways of faith, hopes of faith, may be familiar to him. He may really embrace them, really desire a spiritual prize. But not without cause are we warned (1Co 10:12). Some plan of worldly wisdom, some point of self-seeking or self-indulgence, attracts him; only a little way; not into anything distinctly wrong. Or he falls into indolent self-sufficiency. Then there is a shrinking from close walk with God. Formality takes the place of confidence. All may seem outwardly well; but other powers than God’s will are at work within. And if now some more searching trial is sent, some more distinct choice between God and the world, a self-satisfying plea is easily found. And the self-deceit which led to the fall makes it unfelt. And the path is lighted, but not from God (Isa 1:11).
II. THE HARM DONE TO OTHERS BY UNFAITHFULNESS OF–CHRISTIANS (cf. Rom 2:24; Rom 14:16). The world is quick to mark inconsistencies of believers. They form an excuse for the careless, a plea for disbelieving the reality of holiness. And for weak Christians they throw the influence of example on the wrong side (cf. 1Co 8:9). Deeds have more power than words; and the course of a life may be turned by some thoughtless yielding. Nor can the harm be undone even by repentance. The failure is visible, the contrition and seeking pardon are secret. The sins of good men are eagerly retailed. The earnest supplication for pardon and restoration are known to few, and little cared for. The man himself may be forgiven, and rise stronger from his fall; but the poison in the soul of another is still doing its deadly work.
III. THE WAY OF SAFETY. Realize the living Christ (Eph 3:17). Rules of themselves can do little; but to know the love of Christ, to bear it in mind, is power.M.
Fuente: The Complete Pulpit Commentary
Gen 27:30 And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting.
Ver. 30. Esau his brother came in. ] All too late. Detained he was by the devil, say the Hebrews, who not seldom makes a fool of hunters, and leads them about. A sweet providence of God there was in it, certainly, that he should come in as soon as Isaac had done and Jacob was gone, and no sooner. Like as there was in that which Master Fox a reports of Luther, that on a time, as he was sitting in a certain place upon his stool, a great stone there was in the vault, over his head; which being stayed miraculously so long as he was sitting, as soon as he was up, immediately fell upon the place where he sat, able to have crushed him in pieces. A warrant once came down, under seal, for the execution of the Lady Elizabeth: Stephen Gardiner was the engineer, and thought he had been sure of his prey, but God pulled the morsel out of his mouth; for one Master Bridges, mistrusting false play, presently made haste to the queen, who renounced and reversed it. b Another time, while Sir Henry Benningfield, her keeper, was at court, one Basset, a gentleman and a great favourite of Stephen Gardiner’s, came, with twenty men well appointed, to Woodstock to have murdered her. But by God’s great providence, Sir Henry had left so strict a charge behind him, that no living soul might have access unto the princess, upon what occasion soever, till his return, that they could not be admitted, whereby their bloody enterprise was utterly disappointed. “The Lord knoweth how to deliver his”. 2Pe 2:9 “He keepeth all their bones, not one of them is broken”. Psa 34:20
a Act. and Mon., fol. 793.
b England’s Elizabeth, by Heywood.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Gen 27:30-38
30Now it came about, as soon as Isaac had finished blessing Jacob, and Jacob had hardly gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting. 31Then he also made savory food, and brought it to his father; and he said to his father, “Let my father arise and eat of his son’s game, that you may bless me.” 32Isaac his father said to him, “Who are you?” And he said, “I am your son, your firstborn, Esau.” 33Then Isaac trembled violently, and said, “Who was he then that hunted game and brought it to me, so that I ate of all of it before you came, and blessed him? Yes, and he shall be blessed.” 34When Esau heard the words of his father, he cried out with an exceedingly great and bitter cry, and said to his father, “Bless me, even me also, O my father!” 35And he said, “Your brother came deceitfully and has taken away your blessing.” 36Then he said, “Is he not rightly named Jacob, for he has supplanted me these two times? He took away my birthright, and behold, now he has taken away my blessing.” And he said, “Have you not reserved a blessing for me?” 37But Isaac replied to Esau, “Behold, I have made him your master, and all his relatives I have given to him as servants; and with grain and new wine I have sustained him. Now as for you then, what can I do, my son?” 38Esau said to his father, “Do you have only one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, O my father.” So Esau lifted his voice and wept.
Gen 27:30 “Jacob had hardly gone out” This phrase is a Qal INFINITIVE ABSOLUTE and Qal PERFECT VERB from the same root (BDB 422, KB 425). This is an emphatic phrase denoting the short period of time between Jacob’s departure and Esau’s arrival.
Gen 27:31 “and he said to his father” It is interesting that Esau’s phraseology is exactly like that used by Jacob in Gen 27:19. Possibly Jacob even copied his brother’s idiomatic speech in trying to trick his father. However, it may just be standard idiomatic expression.
Gen 27:32 Suddenly Esau identifies himself as the “firstborn” (BDB 114). This had never interested him before (note Gen 25:29-34).
Gen 27:33 “Then Isaac trembled violently” In the Hebrew the VERB and ACCUSATIVE COGNITIVE (BDB 353, KB 350, cf. Dan 10:7) should be translated “trembled with a very great trembling.” It is my understanding of this text that Isaac finally realizes that he has been fighting against God in trying to bless his firstborn son, Esau, and not that he is only mad at Jacob. It is interesting to note that this is another way for God to show His sovereignty over the covenant in that firstborn children, who normally would receive the promise of the father, do not, in all of these opening chapters of Genesis. It is the second, or later, sons who receive the patriarchal blessing.
“Yes, and he shall be blessed” This phrase can be understood either (1) as against the background of the power of the spoken word, which once given, could not be recalled or (2) as the fact that Isaac realized that he was fighting against God (see preceding note).
Gen 27:34 “he cried out with an exceedingly great and bitter cry” Note the items of intensity.
1. COGNITIVE terms (BDB 858, KB 1042), “he cried out with a cry”
2. “great,” ADJECTIVE (BDB 152)
3. “bitter,” ADJECTIVE (BDB 600 I)
“Bless me, even me also, O my father!” This is the first of two Piel IMPERATIVES (BDB 138, KB 159, cf. Gen 27:38). Heb 12:17 shows us that Esau, although sorry that he had missed the material blessing, was sorry for the wrong reasons.
Gen 27:35-36 “Your brother came deceitfully, and has taken away your blessing” It is only a half truth that Jacob was a “supplanter,” “over-reacher” (BDB 784), and “deceiver” (BDB 941) because (1) Esau had sold his own birthright (cf. Gen 27:36 and Gen 25:27-34) and (2) Isaac ignored the revelation of God to Rebekah in Gen 25:23. The name Jacob is defined as “overreacher” or “supplanter” (BDB 139) in Gen 25:26.
Gen 27:36 “these two times” This obviously refers to Gen 25:27-31; Gen 27:18-29.
“birthright. . .blessing” There is a play on the Hebrew words that sound very much alike: “birthright” equals bekhorah (BDB 114), while “blessing” equals berakhah (BDB 139).
“Have you not reserved a blessing for me” The patriarchal blessing was comprehensive. Everything as far as the family’s leadership and covenant promises (cf. Gen 27:37) was pronounced on Jacob and could not be revoked because of the Hebrew concept of the power of the spoken word in YHWH’s name, even though Isaac was tricked into giving it!
Gen 27:37 Esau was not made a poor person. He still was due one-third of all of Isaac’s property, but he would not be the one in charge of the family’s business nor speaker for the family.
Gen 27:38 “lifted up his voice and wept” This is an emotional Hebrew idiom for expressed sorrow (cf. Gen 21:16).
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
scarce gone out. Hebrew “going was gone”. Figure of speech Polyptoton, for emph.; well represented by the word “scarce”. See note on Gen 26:28.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Esaus Grief and Anger
Gen 27:30-45
Esau apparently had awakened to realize the value of the blessing of the birthright which he had treated so lightly. His exceeding great and bitter cry expressed the anguish of one who awakes to discover that he has forfeited the best for a trifle. But obviously, he was only being held to his own original contract with Jacob. There are similar events in all lives when we take some irrevocable step under the sway of evil passion, and it affects the whole future. There is no place for repentance-i.e., no opportunity of altering the decisive effect, of that act. See Heb 12:17. We may obtain some lower and inferior blessing, as Esau did, acquiring something of the fatness of the earth and the dew of heaven, living by our sword, and finally, after long years, shaking the yoke from our neck, but we can never be what we might have been! We can never undo that moment of sowing to the flesh. See Gal 6:7-8.
Fuente: F.B. Meyer’s Through the Bible Commentary
Reciprocal: Gen 10:9 – a mighty
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Esau’s Despair Almost as soon as Jacob had left, Esau returned with the meat he had killed and prepared. Isaac asked who he was. As soon as Esau identified himself, Isaac realized the deception which had taken place. Esau pleaded for a blessing from his father but the real blessing, though received by deceit, had already gone to his brother. Esau declared his brother properly named Jacob, meaning supplanter. He had supplanted his brother in the birthright and blessing. Isaac did give him such blessing as he could. He said:
Behold your dwelling shall be of the fatness of the earth, And of the dew of heaven from above. By your sword you shall live, And you shall serve your brother; And it shall come to pass, when you become restless, That you shall break his yoke from your neck.
This paltry blessing seemed to focus Esau’s hatred for his brother. He resolved to kill his brother after the time of mourning for his dead father would be finished. Apparently, someone who heard Esau told Rebekah. She called Jacob and had him prepare to go to her brother’s house until the anger subsided. Then, Rebekah went to Isaac and convinced him to send Jacob to Laban’s house to find a wife rather than have another daughter-in-law from among the people around them ( Gen 27:30-46 ).
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
Isaac evidently knew that he had been resisting God’s will and finally accepted defeat submissively (Gen 27:33). Besides in that culture a paternal blessing, much more a divine oracle, such as the one Isaac had uttered, was irrevocable. [Note: See A. C. Thiselton, "The Supposed Power of Words in the Biblical Writings," Journal of Theological Studies NS25:2 (October 1972):294.]
"By showing that the blessing was irrevocable, even by the father who gave the blessing, the writer underscores an important feature of the blessing-its fulfillment is out of human hands." [Note: Sailhamer, The Pentateuch . . ., p. 191.]
Perhaps Isaac did not withdraw the blessing he had given Jacob because he realized that God had overruled his carnal preference for Esau (Gen 27:39-40).
Isaac’s prophecy to Esau was no true blessing. At best he introduced a disturbing element into the blessing he had given Jacob because Jacob had used deception to obtain it.
The mountains of Edom are some of the most desolate and barren of any on earth today. They stand to the southeast of the Dead Sea. Esau’s descendants would subsist by hunting people, just as Esau had subsisted by hunting game.
The Edomites served, revolted from, and were conquered by the Israelites repeatedly during their history. Saul defeated them after they enjoyed a long period of independence (1Sa 14:47). Then David made them his vassals (2Sa 8:14). They tried to revolt under Solomon but were unsuccessful (1Ki 9:14 ff.). The Edomites were subject to Judah until King Joram’s reign when they rebelled successfully. In Amaziah’s reign Judah again subjugated them (2Ki 14:7). They finally achieved permanent freedom from Judah during Ahaz’s reign (2Ki 16:6). John Hyrcanus conquered Edom about 129 B.C., forced the Edomites to submit to circumcision, and incorporated them into the Jewish nation. Later through Antipater and Herod they established the Idumean dynasty over Judah that lasted until the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. The writing prophets sometimes used the Edomites as the epitome of Israel’s enemies.
Rebekah feared the loss of both her sons as a result of her plot (Gen 27:45). Esau might have killed Jacob, and Esau then might have fled, or the avenger of blood might have slain him (cf. Gen 9:6).