Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Genesis 21:15

And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs.

15. cast the child ] This expression taken with the mention of the child in Gen 21:14 ; Gen 21:18 (“hold him in thine hand”), 20 (“and he grew”) implies that Ishmael is regarded in this story as a little boy, who could be carried by his mother.

under one of the shrubs ] We should probably understand by this word the low scrub such as grows in the desert, like the broom, under which Elijah rested, 1Ki 19:4. The word used occurs also in Gen 2:5 in a general sense; see note.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Verse 15. And she cast the child] vattashlech eth haiyeled, and she sent the lad under one of the shrubs, viz., to screen him from the intensity of the heat. Here Ishmael appears to be utterly helpless, and this circumstance seems farther to confirm the opinion that he was now in a state of infancy; but the preceding observations do this supposition entirely away, and his present helplessness will be easily accounted for on this ground:

1. Young persons can bear much less fatigue than those who are arrived at mature age.

2. They require much more fluid from the greater quantum of heat in their bodies, strongly marked by the impetuosity of the blood; because from them a much larger quantity of the fluids is thrown off by sweat and insensible perspiration, than from grown up or aged persons.

3. Their digestion is much more rapid, and hence they cannot bear hunger and thirst as well as the others. On these grounds Ishmael must be much more exhausted with fatigue than his mother.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Not as if she carried him in her arms, or upon her shoulders, for he was now about eighteen years old; but being weak and faint, and no doubt much dejected in spirit upon the prospect of his desolate and distressed condition, she was forced to support and lead him by the hand; but now, despairing of his life, she lays him down under a shrub.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

15. the water was spent,&c.Ishmael sank exhausted from fatigue and thirsthis motherlaid his head under one of the bushes to smell the damp while sheherself, unable to witness his distress, sat down at a littledistance in hopeless sorrow.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

And the water was spent in the bottle,…. It was all drank up by them, being thirsty, having wandered about some time in a wilderness, where they could not replenish their bottle: the Jewish writers say e that when Hagar came into the wilderness, she began to wander after the idols of the house of Pharaoh her father, and immediately the water ceased from the bottle, or was drank up by Ishmael, being seized with a burning fever:

and she cast the child under one of the shrubs; not from off her shoulder, but out of her hand or bosom; being faint through thirst, he was not able to walk, and she, being weary in dragging him along in her hand, perhaps sat down and held him in her lap, and laid him in her bosom; but, imagining he was near his end, she laid him under one of the shrubs in the wilderness, to screen him from the scorching sun, and there left him; the Greek version is, “under one of the fir trees”, and so says Josephus f: some Jewish writers g call them juniper trees; and some make this to be Ishmael’s own act, and say, that, being fatigued with thirst, he went and threw himself under the nettles of the wilderness h, see Job 30:7.

e Pirke Eliezer, ut supra. (c. 30.) Targ. Jon. in loc. f Antiqu. l. 1. c. 12. sect. 3. g Bereshit, ut supra. (sect. 53. fol. 47. 4.) h Pirke Eliezer, ut supra. (c. 30.)

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

(15) She cast the child under one of the shrubs.The act was one of despair. Ishmael, though seventeen years of age, had not yet come to his strength, and at a time when human life was so prolonged that forty was the usual age for marriage, was probably not as capable of bearing fatigue as a young man nearly grown up would be in our days. He thus became exhausted, and apparently fainted; and his mother, after trying in vain to support him, cast him down in anguish, and abandoned herself to her grief.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

15. Cast the child From this it has been inferred that Ishmael could not have been a youth of over fifteen years . But neither the word lad ( ) (Gen 21:12) nor child ( ) implies that Ishmael was an infant, nor does the word cast ( ) necessarily imply that she hurled him from her arms . “The boy was young, but he was old enough to give offence to Sarah by mocking . At a time when human life was much longer than it now is, (Ishmael himself died at 137, Gen 25:17,) fifteen or sixteen would be little removed from childhood . The growing lad would be easily exhausted with the heat and wandering; whilst the hardy habits of the Egyptian handmaid would enable her to endure much greater fatigue . She had hitherto led the boy by the hand; now she left him, fainting and prostrate, under the shelter of a tree . ” Speaker’s Commentary .

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Ishmael’s Life Saved

v. 15. And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. Apparently Hagar lost her way, or some miscalculation interfered, for the water in the skin was exhausted before she reached a spring. The ensuing suffering soon became so great that the boy was unable to support himself. For a while his mother supported him, drawing him along and half carrying him, in the hope of finding water. But at last she was obliged to let him sink down, her mother-love, however, selecting a shady place under a bush.

v. 16. And she went and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bow-shot; for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice and wept. Here are further traits of a mother’s undying love. She would not abandon the lad entirely, even if she might have gotten help; she could not bear to see him suffer and probably die before her eyes of thirst. So she sat down at a distance equal to that usually taken by bowmen shooting at a target, and wept out loud in full abandonment to her grief.

v. 17. And God heard the voice of the lad; and the Angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? Fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he Isaiah

v. 18. Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation. In this great extremity Ishmael forgot all his mocking and turned to the prayers which he had learned in his father’s house. In answer to this prayer the Angel of God in the specific sense, the Son of God, who had appeared to her once before, Gen 16:9-13, bade her not to fear, but to arise, to lift up her son, and to support him, since he was not to die, but to live, and to become the ancestor of a great people.

v. 19. And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water. And she went and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink. Help had been so near at hand, but Hagar, in her own exhausted condition, had not noticed the spring which welled forth at a small distance. Now she filled the skin which she carried and refreshed her son, thus saving his life.

v. 20. And God was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer.

v. 21. And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran; and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt. Ishmael grew up as a true son of the desert, living in the great wilderness which extends on the southern boundary of Canaan from Egypt to Arabia. The blessing of God rested upon him. He became very skilful with the bow and married an Egyptian woman whom his mother selected for him. This fact, unfortunately, strengthened the heathen element in the Ishmaelites and probably caused their abandoning of the true God in a very short time.

Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann

EXPOSITION

Gen 21:15

And the water was spent in (literally, from) the bottle,so that the wanderers became exhausted, and were in danger of fainting through thirstand she cast the childa translation which certainly conveys an erroneous impression, first of Ishmael, who was not an infant, but a grown lad (vide supra, Gen 21:14), and secondly of Ishmael’s mother, whom it represents as acting with violence, if not with inhumanity; whereas the sense probably is that, having, as long as her rapidly diminishing strength permitted, supported her fainting son, she at length suddenly, through feebleness, released his nerveless hand as he fell, and in despair, finding herself unable to give him further assistance, left him, as she believed, to die where he had flung himself in his intolerable anguishunder one of the shrubs.

Gen 21:16

And she went, and sat her down , the pronoun being added to the verb, as an ethical dative, to indicate that the action was of special importance to her, meaning, “she, for herself, or for her part, sat down”over against him a good way off. The hiph. inf. of , to go far away, to recede from any one, is here used adverbially, as in Jos 3:16 (Gesenius, Furst, Kalisch), though by others it is understood as explaining the action of the previous verbs, and as equivalent to a gerund in do, or a participle, elon-gando se (Rosenmller), or simply” removing to a distance”. As it were a bowshot. Literally, as those who draw the bow, i.e. as far off as archers are accustomed to place the target (Keil). The sense is correctly given by the LXX.: . For she said, Let me not seei.e. look upon with anguish (cf. Num 11:15)the death of the child (LXX.). And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept. The verbs, being feminine, indicate that it is Hagar’s grief which is here described, and that the rendering, “and the child lifted up his voice and wept” (LXX.), is incorrect; although the next verse may suggest that Ishmael, like his mother, was also dissolved in tears.

Gen 21:17

And GodElohim; Hagar and Ishmael having now been removed from the care and superintendence of the covenant God to the guidance and providence of God the ruler of all nations (Keil)heard the voice of the lad;praying (Inglis), or weeping, ut supraand the angel of GodMaleach Elohim; not Maleach Jehovah, as in Gen 16:7-13, for the reason above specified (Hengstenberg, Quarry)called to Hagar out of heaven,it may be inferred there was no external appearance or theophaneia, such as was vouchsafed to her when wandering in the wilderness of Shut (Gen 16:7)and said unto her, What aileth thee (literally, What to thee?) Hagar? fear not;so the word of Jehovah addressed Abram (Gen 15:1), Isaac (Gen 26:4), Daniel (Dan 10:12), and John (Rev 1:17)for God hath heard the voice of the ladi.e. the voice (perhaps the mute cry) of the lad’s misery, and in that also the audible sob of Hagar’s weeping. It is net said that either Ishmael or his mother prayed to God in their distress. Hence the Divine interposition on their behalf non quid a se peterent, sed quid servo suo Abrahae de Ismaele pollicitus foret, respexit (Calvin)where he isan ellipsis for from, or in, the place where he is; (LXX.); ex loco ubi est (Calvin); meaning either “in his helpless condition” (Keil), or out in the desolate wilderness, as contrasted with the house of Abraham (Calvin).

Gen 21:18

Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand. Literally, bind fast ray hand to him, i.e. give him thy support now, and take cars of him till he reaches manhood. Cf. God’s promise to Israel (Isa 42:6). For I will make him (literally, to) a great nation (vide Gen 21:13; and cf. Gen 16:10; Gen 17:20).

Gen 21:19

And God opened her eyes. Not necessarily by miraculous operation; perhaps simply by providentially guiding her search for water, after the administered consolation had revived her spirit and roused her energies. And she saw a well of water, , as distinguished from , a pit or cistern, meant a fountain or spring of living water (cf. Gen 24:11, Gen 24:20; Gen 26:19, Gen 26:20, Gen 26:21). It had not been previously observed by Hagar, either because of her mental agitation (dolors quasi caeca. Rosenmller), or because, as was customary, the mouth of the well was coveredand she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drinkwhich was certainly the first of the youth’s necessities, being needful to the preservation of his life and the reviving of his spirits.

Gen 21:20, Gen 21:21

And God was with the lad. Not simply in the ordinary sense in which he is with all men (Psa 139:3-9; Act 17:27, Act 17:28); not, certainly, in the spiritual sense in which he had promised to be with Isaac (Gen 17:21), and in which he is with believers (Gen 26:24; Isa 41:10; Mat 28:20); but in the particular sense of exercising towards him a special providence, with a view to implementing the promise made concerning him to Abraham and Hagar. And he grew (literally, became great, i.e. progressed towards manhood), and dwelt in the wilderness (i.e. led a roving and unsettled life), and became an archer. Literally, and he was i.e. deriving from , to grow great or multiply, either

(1) when he grew up, an archer, or man using the bow (Gesenius, Keil);

(2) growing an archer, or acquiring skill as a bowman (Kalisch, Wordsworth); or

(3) growing, or multiplying into, a tribe of archers (Murphy). With the first of these substantially agree the renderings (LXX), and factus est juvenis sagittarius (Vulgate). Others, connecting with , in the sense of to cast arrows (cf. Gen 49:23), read,

(1) “and he was a shooter of arrows from the bow” (Jarchi, Kimchi, Rosenmller), though in this case would have to be read for (Furst);

(2) a marksman, archer, i.e. a marksman skilled in using the bow. Baumgarten translates, a hero (or great one), an archer. And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran:the desert of El-Tih, on the south of Canaan (cf. Gen 14:6)and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt (cf. Gen 24:4, Gen 24:55; Exo 21:10).

HOMILETICS

Gen 21:15-21

Hagar and Ishmael, or the fortunes of the outcasts.

I. THE LONELY WANDERERS.

1. Banished from home. Hitherto the household of Abraham had been to Hagar and her boy such a pleasant and doubtless much-prized abode; henceforth their connection with the patriarch’s encampment was to be completely severed. So God in his mysterious providence and in many different ways frequently bereaves men of the shelter and society of home.

2. Separated from the Church. Practically the expulsion of this Egyptian slave-mother and her son from the household of Abraham, if it did not involve a casting off from God’s mercy, amounted to extrusion from the patriarchal Church.

3. Lost in the wilderness. Whether because the region through which they traveled was unfamiliar, or because, impelled by indignation and excitement, they simply drifted on with aimless feet, the narrative depicts the unhappy pair as having “wandered,” turned aside into unfrequented paths, and become lost; in that touchingly portraying the sad condition of thousands or homeless and churchless wanderers to-day, roaming purposeless and perplexed across the trackless waste of life.

II. THE FAINTING YOUTH.

1. Perishing through thirst. Extreme thirst one of the most excruciating torments to which the physical frame can be subjected, and a fellow-creature dying for lack of water, one of the commonest of God’s mercies, as sad a spectacle as any on which the eye of man can gaze.

2. Sobbing in anguish. Too exhausted to weep aloud, the poor disheartened lad moans out his misery. Happy they who, if they cannot relieve, can at least understand and be affected by their necessities. To recognize and make complaint of one’s spiritual destitution is better than to be callous and indifferent to one’s dying condition.

3. Praying to God. Though not certain that the “voice” of the lad meant more than the rude cry of his distress, charity may hope that in the day of his calamity he directed his prayer to God. Prayer generally precedes deliverance.

III. THE WEEPING MOTHER.

1. The voice of heathen, superstition. “Let me not see the death of the lad.” To a Christian mother Hagar’s behavior is simply inexplicable. It is doubtful if Sarah would hate been a bow-shot removed from Isaac had he been expiring. But then Hagar, though she had been Abraham’s wife, was still a poor untutored slave-girl. It rosy assist us to understand our indebtedness to the humanizing influences of Christ’s religion.

2. The cry of material affection “She sat over against her boy, and lifted up her voice and wept.” Even in the breast of this Egyptian bondmaid nature asserted her supremacy. Everywhere beautiful and sacred is a mother’s love, worthy of being cherished and reciprocated by those who know its sweetness and strength, never failing to bring down retribution on those by whom it is rejected and despised.

IV. THE COMFORTING GOD.

1. Sympathizing with the sorrowful. “What aileth thee, Hagar?” What a glimpse into the infinite pitifulness of the Divine nature! Only when Christ came was it surpassed in clearness and fullness.

2. Listening to the suppliant. As the prayer of Ishmael came up into the wakeful ear of God, so the cries of dying men and perishing souls never fail to do.

3. Consoling the dejected. As to Hagar the angel spoke words of encouragement, and renewed the formerly-given assurance concerning the future greatness of her son, so God revives the drooping spirits of his people by directing them to his exceeding great and precious promises.

4. Providing for the destitute. “God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water.” And so by the leadings of his providence, the teachings of his word, and the illumination of his Spirit does God guide the meek to the wells of salvation.

5. Abiding with the homeless. “God was with the lad.” Ejected from Abraham’s house, he was not deserted by Abraham’s God. Happy they who amid life’s wanderings can count on God’s companionship. For desertions of friends and deprivations of goods it will prove ample compensation.

Learn

1. To prize the blessing of a home and the privilege of a Church.

2. To commiserate and succor those who have neither.

3. To use God in all the revealed aspects of his gracious character.

HOMILIES BY F. HASTINGS

Gen 21:17

Hagar, a weary outcast.

“What aileth thee, Hagar?” Hagar is sent away from Abraham’s tents. In the wilderness wandering she is lost. In despair she sinks down and weeps. An angel’s voice is heard inquiring, “What aileth thee, Hagar?”

I. HAGAR MAY BE TAKEN AS REPRESENTING THE SOULS STILL CHRISTLESS, They are

1. Weary.

2. Thirsty.

3. Apparently man-forsaken and God-forsaken.

4. Their dearest comforts slipping from them, as Hagar’s child, by death.

5. Death expecting.

II. HAGAR‘S ACT INDICATES HOW SUCH SOULS SHOULD ACT IN TROUBLE.

1. Realize it.

2. Seek deliverance from above.

God nearer to us than we imagine. He feels for us, hears us, helps us. He gives sustenance, cheer, guidance.H.

HOMILIES BY J.F. MONTGOMERY

Gen 21:17-19

God’s appearance to Hagar.

The greatest truths in the Bible put before us in a setting of human interest and feeling. Our hearts strangely touched by the picture of the desolate woman and the helpless child. The fatherly character of God exhibited. He heard the voice of the lad. All such facts point to the greatest fact, the union of God and man in the man Christ Jesus. We see here

I. GOD‘S NOTICE OF AND COMPASSION FOR HUMAN SUFFERING: our example, The object of pity apart from antecedents.

II. THE WORKING OUT OF DIVINE PURPOSES notwithstanding, and to some extent by means of, human infirmities, errors, and sins. Ishmael must be preserved, and has his part to play in the future.

III. Taken TYPICALLY, Hagar and Ishmael represent the life of man apart from the covenant of God, outside the circle of special privilege. There is God in the wilderness. The eyes which are darkened with ignorance and self-will may yet be mercifully opened to see the well of water. The angel of deliverance follows even the bondwoman and her son. But the way to God through the wilderness is a hard way, a way of suffering, a way of danger. God was with Ishmael. He was with him through Abraham, for Abraham’s sake. The course of Ishmael’s life illustrates the contrast between a truly religious career and one given up to natural impulse. Cf. Esau and Joseph’s brethren.R.

HOMILIES BY J.F. MONTGOMERY

Gen 21:19

Hagar in the wilderness.

“And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water.” Hagar in the wilderness. Why? She had no pleasure in her home; would not accept her position there. Hence Ishmael’s mocking. Compare working of pride in Eden”Ye shall be as gods;” and its resultAdam and Eve driven out. Observea soul despising the position of a child of God is driven into the wilderness by its own act. Pride rebels against terms of salvation (Rom 10:3)-a free gift to sinners seeking it as such (Mar 2:17). Hagar felt her misery, like many who find no peace. “All is vanity.” She sat down and wept. Did she cry to God? He had met her there before. Past mercies should move to trust (Psa 42:6). But pride and unbelief hinder prayer (Exo 17:3-6). But God had not forgotten her (cf. Mat 18:11). “What aileth thee?” Compare our Lord’s dealing with those he helped.

1. Himself taking the first step.

2. Requiring a confession of their want.

3. Rousing expectation (Joh 4:14; Joh 7:37).

I. THE WELL WAS NEAR HER, BUT SHE SAW IT NOT. So is it with the water of life. Why are so many without peace? The well is beside them; the sound of the gospel is familiar to them. The Bible is read in their hearing, but it speaks nothing to them (2Co 3:15). Christ died for all (2Co 5:14). His blood the ransom for all (1Jn 1:7). We have not to go to seek a Savior (Rom 10:6-8). No sin too deep for cleansing, no sorrow too great for comfort; nothing required to give a right to trust him (Isa 55:1; Luk 15:2). Why without peace? The eyes are closed to the truth (1Co 2:14). Human teaching cannot give life (Eze 37:8). What is wanted is not a new fountain, but opened eyes. And it is disbelief of this that keeps so many in anxiety. To them the well is not there; they want God to give it. They look for something they are to do to find a Savior. Important to know what is wantedspiritual discernment. To many this seems a mere fancy; but they whose eyes are opened know it to be a passing from darkness to light (cf. 2Ti 1:10). Words often read become full of new meaning.

II. GOD OPENED HER EYES. It is blindness that causes trouble; but as blind cannot see by his own will, so neither can the unspiritual. The way of salvation is before him, but while it commends itself to his reason it brings him no joy. Are we then without effort to sit still? No; all is ready on God’s part. “Wilt thou be made whole?” Want of will alone hinders. Often men would like to drink, but not at God’s fountain. Make an effort to believe, and power will be given.

III. WHAT SHE SAW. The well of life; the revelation of Jesus Christ to the soulthis is peace. Not our own powers or wisdom, not our own holiness or advance in grace; but trust in him. No more fears. True, the wilderness is there; the work has to be done, temptations overcome, sorrows borne, graces cultivated; but we can do all through Christ. Now troubles become helps (Psa 84:6), for they make us flee to Christ (2Co 12:9). And who can count the blessings revealed to him whose eyes are opened? A Father in everythingprotection, teaching, guidance. Everything surrounding him, every event that happens to him, are inlets of ever increasing knowledge of God, whom to know is life eternal.M.

HOMILIES BY F. HASTINGS

Gen 21:20

God’s care for Ishmael.

“And God was with the lad.” The encampment of Abraham was the scene of joy and festivity on the occasion of the recognition of Isaac publicly as his heir. It is said in Jewish lore that Abraham called a number of the patriarchs to the feast, and that Melchizedek, Nahor, and even Noah were present. Ishmael had been heir-presumptive up to that time. He was then put in the position of a subject to the son of Sarah. He and his mother despised the weakling and nursling. They “mocked.” This roused the indignation of Sarah, and she insisted on the banishment of both. Abraham was very unwilling to consent to the proposal, for he had great affection for Ishmael. No wonder that he loved him, for he was, if not the child of promise, at least the son who first roused in his breast the pride and joy of paternity. He seems to have hoped that Ishmael would be the one through whom the great blessings promised to him would be bestowed. Hence he had prayed, “O that Ishmael might live before thee” (Gen 17:18). Perhaps unbelief had much to do with the expression of the hope. He indicated his own contentment with that mode of fulfillment of the premise; God, however, has another. Abraham evidently loved the lad, and now that he is grown to be a stalwart youth of about sixteen, it is strongly against his inclination to send him away. Sarah insists. She in her indignation will not even speak of him by his name, but calls him contemptuously “the son of this bondwoman” (Gen 21:10). Abraham was very grieved (Gen 21:11), but he can see that there is no prospect of any peace in his encampment unless he should do as Sarah wishes. Two jealous women are enough to embitter his life, and bring discord eventually among his retainers For typical reasons the banishment was permitted by God (Gen 21:12), and Abraham sends both away, laden probably not only with trinkets, which shall suffice for barter, but with a flask of water and strings of small loaves. Abraham had thus to sacrifice his own inclinations in Ishmael, his son after the flesh, as afterwards his will in offering up Isaac, his child of promise. Away towards Egypt Hagar and Ishmael travel. They enter the wilderness of Beersheba. Happiness and home is behind; desolateness, dreariness, lonely journeyings, imminent dangers from the wild beasts and fierce hordes of men, with Egypt, before them. Hagar, with bread dry and water spent, losing her way, waits for some one to guide. Unable to proceed, she and her son sink down to die, to perish in the scorching heat from that most fearful of all deprivations, water. Hagar, with bitter memories of lost happiness and unjust treatment crowding, cannot bear the sight of her son’s woe and sound of his moaning, therefore removes to a slight distance, that she might not see his death nor disturb it as she sought to ease her poor heart with tears. Oh, what moral beauty blossoms in the desert in the maternal love of this outcast bondwoman. No human eye detects it, but God notices and hears her voice, and that of the child. Then comes the direction from heaven, and the promise, “I will make of him a great nation.” We are told immediately afterwards in the brief record concerning Ishmael that “God was with the lad,” and so the promise was fulfilled. We notice Gods care even for an Ishmael, for one who would appear to be outside all covenant blessings. He was one whose “hand was to be against every man, and every man’s against him” (Gen 16:12). God manifested care, however, to this Ishmael

I. BY PRESERVING HIS LIFE. He heard his cry in distress. He knew his needs. God always knows our needs; whence to supply them, and where to find us even in the wilderness. A well of water is unexpectedly pointed out to the mother. Her eyes were opened to see its whereabouts. So God teaches many a mother, that she may lead her children to the well of living water. Every life preserved is only through the mercy of God. “In his hand our breath is” (Dan 5:23). There is a well for bondsmen as well as free. God’s living well is to be reached in any position of life. It is near to us when we think it far off. “The word is nigh thee, in thine heart,” &c. (Rom 10:8). If we are to see the treasure, our spiritual understanding must be quickened, our “eyes opened” by the Holy Spirit. If we desire to know the way and well of life, we can pray for that opening. Only as we have this spiritual sight and life can we rejoice in the present existence, in our preservation. God preserved Ishmael that he might know him.

II. GOD ADVANCED HIM IN LIFE. He was with him as he grew up, and gave him favor in the sight of others. God is ever seeking by his Holy Spirit to mould the character of the worst for good. If we have any prosperity and grow up to influence, we should remember that it is from God. The darkest hour for Ishmael had ushered in the dawning of the brightest day. God knew what he would do with Ishmael. Ishmael is to found a nation. It is remarkable that he was the ancestor of the same number of tribes as was Israel (Gen 25:16). He found various scattered people in the Arabian desert, but the tribes descended from him seem to have absorbed all others. What an honor to be the founder of a house, a dynasty; how much more of a nation! This God granted to an Ishmael.

III. GOD GAVE HIM SKILL. “He became an archer.” He had to learn to defend himself, and secure for himself, by God’s help, a position. The fighting power is not the highest, but man has always had to protect himself before he could make progress in civilization. Alas, when he supposes himself to be civilized he often clings to the old habit, and still loves the fighting. The archers, like Ishmael, have their sphere as well as the shepherds, like Isaacs. The fiery defenders of faith and the controversial champions of the truth have their sphere as well as the pious, plodding pastors of Christ’s flock. If men have skill for the one thing, let them not despise the powers of others. We have all to learn to appreciate diversity of talents, and to remember that skill in any work is the outcome of independence, resolution, and energy. Ishmael had been endowed with these by God.

IV. GOD FURNISHED ISHMAEL WITH A PLACE OF HABITATION. He gave to him the desert for his domain. Here he might roam and pitch his tent at his own suggestion. God knew that the hot blood of his Egyptian mother, which coursed in his veins, would find its most fitting sphere in the desert. Instead of mingling with gentle herdsmen, he had to dwell among the fierce and untrained spirits of the desert. He became an ancestor of those who despised town life, and who were hardy and frugal enough to exist where others would have perished. Thus to Ishmael, the desert, with its widespread, sun-scorched sands, its scant herbage, its infrequent wells and scattered oases, became a fitting home. God chose for him his dwelling-place, and defined for him the bounds of his habitation. And is it not best for us to leave ourselves in God’s hands? He knows best where to place any of us, and what work to give us to do, what sphere to fill. We might prefer the green pasture and hills flowing with milk and honey of the Canaan of prosperity, but the desert of trial and loneliness may be the best for training our spirits. We may have losses to endure outwardly, but if we can acquire a spirit of content and faith, that is great gain. That spirit will lead us to say, “He shall choose our inheritance for us.”

V. GOD ALSO INSURED ISHMAEL‘S HONOR AMONG HIS BRETHREN. He was to “dwell in the presence of his brethren” (Gen 16:12). Though cast out by Abraham, he was not cast off by God or cut off from all interchange with others. We find (Gen 25:6) that Abraham gave portions to the sons of his second wife, Keturah, and sent them away. Doubtless he gave a portion to Ishmael, for we find him uniting with Isaac in the funeral obsequies of his father (Gen 25:9). The two sons were not at enmity now. Further, he seems to have kept up his union with his brother, for his daughter Bashemath (Gen 36:3) married Esau, Isaac’s son. Thus two families in the line of promise, but who had cast themselves outEsau by his indifference, and Ishmael by his mockingwere united. Thus, although of fierce and fiery nature, Ishmael “dwelt in the presence of his brethren.” God was with him. He had a shorter life than Isaac. Ishmael died at 130 years old, Isaac at 180. Evidently the active, restless, wandering, hazardous life was more wearing and consuming than the calm and meditative life of the pastoral Isaac. But when he died God cared for him as well as for Isaac, only his purposes with respect to Isaac were different. Isaac Was an ancestor after the flesh of the Messiah, but Ishmael had not that honor. Still we must not think that God had cast off Ishmael, and left him utterly and everlastingly to perish. Our God cares for those outside the pale of the Church, even as for those within. The former have not taken up their privileges, nor seen how Christ loves them. They are suffering great loss, and are in danger of further loss, but God cares for and pities them. He wills not the death of a sinner. He pitied the people of Nineveh, sent them a warning, and gave them space for repentance. He healed a Naaman; sent his prophet to dwell with a woman of Sarepta, and so conferred honor upon her; and he brought a Nebuchadnezzar to his right mind by a judicious infliction. All this was mercy shown outside the pale of Israel to those who would be accounted as Ishmaelites. Oh, how much more widely flows the channel of Divine mercy and love than we imagine I How little we conceive the depth of the Father’s love to all his creatures I In every heart he is seeking to find a reflection of his image. By the side of every soul, however much of an Ishmaelite, he is seeking by his Holy Spirit to walk, that he may win back to the fold of love and mercy. Oh, ye who think yourselves too sinful to have a share in the Divine compassion, see God’s treatment of an Ishmael. Remember that Christ came “not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” God is merciful even to thoughtless sinners, and gives streams in the desert. If this be the spirit of our God and Savior, should it not teach us to take an interest in all? As the sun when setting in the west throws his golden and purple rays not only over the broad ocean, but on the dank ditches of the meadows and the puddles of the street, so should we remember that there is no heart so depraved but the love of God in Christ may light it up. If only we looked at our fellows thus, with deeper sympathy, we should see them won to Christ.H.

Fuente: The Complete Pulpit Commentary

Gen 21:15 And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs.

Ver. 15. And the water was spent in the bottle. ] All creature comforts will fade and fail us; as the brook Cherith dried up while the prophet was drinking of it; as those pools about Jerusalem, that might be dried up, with the tramplings of horse and horsemen. 2Ki 19:24 But they that drink of Christ’s water shall never thirst; for it shall be in them (as the widow’s oil, or Aaron’s ointment) “a well of water springing up to eternal life”. Joh 4:14

She cast the child, &c. ] Whom till then she had led in her hand, faint, and ready to die for thirst; who while he lived at the full in his father’s house, but could not be contented. God loves to let us see the worth of his favours by the want of them; a to chasten men’s insolency with indigency, as he did the prodigal in the gospel.

a Carendo potius quam fruendo.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Gen 21:15-19

15When the water in the skin was used up, she left the boy under one of the bushes. 16Then she went and sat down opposite him, about a bowshot away, for she said, “Do not let me see the boy die.” And she sat opposite him, and lifted up her voice and wept. 17God heard the lad crying; and the angel of God called to Hagar from heaven and said to her, “What is the matter with you, Hagar? Do not fear, for God has heard the voice of the lad where he Isaiah 18 Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him by the hand, for I will make a great nation of him.” 19Then God opened her eyes and she saw a well of water; and she went and filled the skin with water and gave the lad a drink.

Gen 21:15

NASB, TEVleft”

NKJVplaced”

NRSVcast”

NJBabandoned”

The term (BDB 1020) denotes an abandoning (Exo 1:22; Isa. 71:9; Jer 38:6; Jer 38:9; Eze 16:5), which expects death.

Gen 21:16 “a bowshot away” This rare VERB (BDB 377, KB 373, Polel PARTICIPLE) is found only here in the OT.

“and lifted up her voice and wept” There is some confusion in the text here because the Angel of the Lord said He heard the lad crying and only the mother’s voice is mentioned. However, we must remember that this is only a brief summary of the situation and all of the action is not included. The Angel of the Lord spoke to Hagar again as He had in l6:6ff which shows the love of God even for those peripherally connected with Abraham.

Gen 21:17-18 God addresses Hagar.

1. “What is the matter with you?” (no VERB)

2. “Do not fear,” BDB 431, KB 432, Qal IMPERFECT used as a JUSSIVE, cf. same root in Gen 15:1; Gen 26:24; Gen 46:3

3. “Arise,” BDB 877, KB 1086, Qal IMPERATIVE

4. “Lift up the lad,” BDB 669, KB 724, Qal IMPERATIVE

5. “Hold him by the hand,” BDB 304, KB 302, Hiphil IMPERATIVE, this implies care for him, sustaining him.

Gen 21:17 Also notice how Elohim and the Angel of the LORD are identified (i.e., they speak from heaven), yet are separate (cf. Exo 3:2; Exodus 4). See Special Topic: The Angel of the Lord at Gen 12:7.

“for God has heard” This is a play on Ishmael’s name (cf. Gen 16:11). The VERB “hear” (BDB 1033), “Ishmael” (BDB 1035), and “God hears” are obviously from the same root.

Gen 21:18 “for I will make a great nation of him” The VERB (BDB 962, KB 1321, Qal IMPERFECT) means “to set” or “to place,” cf. Gen 21:13; Gen 46:3. This is not the same VERB (BDB 793, KB 889, Qal IMPERFECT used in a COHORTATIVE sense) used in YHWH’s promise to Abram in Gen 12:2 nor Gen 18:18 (BDB 224, KB 243, Qal INFINITIVE ABSOLUTE).

Gen 21:19 One wonders if Gen 21:19 is a miracle of sight or the provision of a previously non-existent water source. This same term is used in Gen 3:5 and 2Ki 6:15-19.

Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley

the water: Gen 21:14, Exo 15:22-25, Exo 17:1-3, 2Ki 3:9, Psa 63:1, Isa 44:12, Jer 14:3

and she cast the child: Or, “and she sent the lad,” to screen him from the intensity of the heat.

Reciprocal: 1Ki 17:10 – Fetch me 1Ki 19:4 – sat down

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge