And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
The New Jerusalem, Rev 21:2
2. And I John saw ] Read simply, and I saw.
new Jerusalem ] For the old Jerusalem, though we saw (Rev 20:9, and note) that it is to be again “a holy city” in the last days as of old, will have passed away with “the first earth.”
coming down from God out of heaven ] Transpose the two clauses, out of heaven from God. This is the New Jerusalem of which the earthly city is an imperfect copy; see on Rev 4:6, Rev 6:9 for the heavenly Temple. While this world lasts, this true Jerusalem is above (Gal 4:26); and we only know its nature from the earthly copy of it, before Christ came, and the spiritual approach to it (Heb 12:22) since. But in the days here described, it will be realised on earth in all its perfection.
prepared ] The building and arrangements of the city serve the same purpose as the dress and ornaments of a bride. Cf. Isa 61:10.
as a bride ] See Rev 19:7, and notes thereon.
adorned &c.] Isa 61:10.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven – See the Analysis of the chapter. On the phrase new Jerusalem, see the Gal 4:26 note, and Heb 12:22 note. Here it refers to the residence of the redeemed, the heavenly world, of which Jerusalem was the type and symbol. It is here represented as coming down from God out of heaven. This, of course, does not mean that this great city was literally to descend upon the earth, and to occupy any one part of the renovated world; but it is a symbolical or figurative representation, designed to show that the abode of the righteous will be splendid and glorious. The idea of a city literally descending from heaven, and being set upon the earth with such proportions – three hundred and seventy miles high Rev 21:16, made of gold, and with single pearls for gates, and single gems for the foundations – is absurd. No man can suppose that this is literally true, and hence this must be regarded as a figurative or emblematic description. It is a representation of the heavenly state under the image of a beautiful city, of which Jerusalem was, in many respects, a natural and striking emblem.
Prepared as a bride adorned for her husband – See the notes on Isa 49:18; Isa 61:10. The purpose here is, to represent it as exceedingly beautiful. The comparison of the church with a bride, or a wife, is common in the Scriptures. See the Rev 19:7-8 notes, and Isa 1:21 note. It is also common in the Scriptures to compare a city with a beautiful woman, and these images here seem to be combined. It is a beautiful city that seems to descend, and this city is itself compared with a richly-attired bride prepared for her husband,
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rev 21:2
The holy city, New Jerusalem.
The descent of the New Jerusalem
When tired of the turmoils of the present, how delightful it is to look up and hear, from the blessed source of all transgression, Behold, I make all things new! (chap. 5). All things–science, literature, arts, philosophies, commerce, trade, intercourse between countries and provinces, and above all, in religion–all things will be made new. This new golden age belongs to a more interior Christianity than earth has yet received: an inner city for the soul, which was imaged by that which John saw, a golden city and a crystal one, descending from the Lord out of heavens a New Church, the Bride, the Lambs wife. Some are startled when they hear of a new Church; yet nothing can be plainer than that such a Church was in due time to be given to men. Jerusalem in the Scriptures signifies the Church: a New Jerusalem must therefore mean a New Church. The magnificent city beheld in spirit by John was a grand symbol of the future new and glorious Church which would bless the earth. It is to descend from God, the Father of His people and the Author of all good out of heaven. It does not originate with man. When the Lord came into the world and planted the kingdom of God within men, as He said (Luk 17:20-21), it is foretold by the prophet in similar terms to those used by John, For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth, etc. (Isa 65:17-18). To alter the state of society altogether, both as to its principles and practices, is to change heaven and earth. If any man be in Christ, said Paul, he is a new creature; old things have passed away; behold all things have become new (2Co 5:17). And, indeed, when this happy change takes place with any one individually, he feels all things to have a new face and a new reality for him. His view of the Lord is altogether bright and new, where it had before been dark and threatening. His thoughts, his hopes, his prospects, are altogether confident and cheerful, and his outward life is new and virtuous. And may we not look around now, and ask, Is it not so? Has not society, even now, immensely changed? Where are the old bigoted principles which taught men to go out and persecute, and even destroy others, in the name of God? Where all the old maxims which taught each nation to regard others as their natural enemies, and to injure and destroy their power and their trade as a patriotic act and a duty? Where are the selfish maxims which confined power and privilege to a few to whom all others should slavishly bend? These are all gone, or rapidly going; and, instead of their unholy reign, we see constantly advanced and constantly extending sentiments of brotherhood, of reverential remembrance that we are all children of One who is our Father and our Saviour. Every year the mutual intercourse of nations, and the good-will which is its attendant, are extending, and, aided by the victorious march of steam and telegraph, will no doubt ere long unite all nations in the ties of mutual love. A new heaven and a new earth are indeed appearing. And now, therefore, is the time that the New Jerusalem may be expected. Oh, what a hope and a blessing for mankind are unfolded by the descent of this city of God! To those who enter it the perplexities of ages are ended. Enmity gives way to love, anxiety to trust, and crime to virtue. God in His Divine humanity dwells with men. They shall be His people, and God Himself shall be with them, and be their God. (J. Bailey, Ph. D.)
Heaven
I saw the holy city. The words are allegorical of course. But they signify something in which we all believe. A city is a real thing. Not the less real if it be heavenly. The holy city is what we commonly call heaven.
I. Heaven is a state. It is not a place. It may or may not be connected with space: we know not. Certainly that is not its essence. Where God is, where Christ is, there is heaven. If even it have a place, that is not what makes it heaven. Even already, even in this life, we have had experience that neither place nor yet circumstance is a condition of happiness. Such glimpses of happiness as we catch below, whether in others or in ourselves, are absolutely independent of both. Heaven is a state–a state of happiness; of perfect satisfaction for the whole man, in body, soul, and spirit; the entire absence for ever of all that is painful and bitter and sorrowful, and the conscious, the pervading presence of all that is restful and delightful and blessed.
II. Heaven is a society. On the one side we have had trying experiences in this world of companies and co-existences which were not delightful. The wear and tear of life, the rubs and jars of life, the annoyances and wearinesses of life, are connected in our thoughts not with solitude but with society. But when we speak of heaven, of the Holy City, as a society, we must carefully exclude all these experiences. In heaven there will be perfect communion of mind with mind, heart with heart, spirit with spirit.
1. In his vision of the great multitude which no man could number he gives this as the history of them all (Rev 7:14).
2. There will be this also–a unity of employment (Rev 14:4; Rev 22:3). There will be no monotony there–but there will be unbroken harmony; harmony not of praise only but of work.
3. This unity of memory, and this unity of employment in the holy city, will be, further, and yet more briefly, a unity of worship. (Dean Vaughan.)
The New Jerusalem
But why a New Jerusalem? Because the old one failed of its purpose, and was spoiled by the wickedness of man. What is the idea of Jerusalem as depicted in the Bible? Simply a city where everything is at peace because it is under the full enjoyment of Gods presence, a city which is safe and happy because it allows itself to be guided and ruled by God in every detail. As, however, this old Jerusalem failed of its object, it is the work of God in the Christian dispensation to form a new one. And this is going on now; we are still hoping for and working towards the New Jerusalem. But God does not tell us merely to look forward to it. Just as in the wilderness He was with His people, foreshadowing the glory of Jerusalem in the glory of the tabernacle, so now He is still going about with humanity. We are not, then, to look forward to a Jerusalem as something which will be entirely new, or to a heaven which will be absolutely strange, but rather it is our duty in this world to build up a social life upon such principles as we know will form the basis of life in the future state. There are three great principles appearing over and over again in the Apocalypse in its references to this heavenly society, the New Jerusalem; and the first is that it is a life of brotherhood, of social brotherhood. All the beings to be found there are of one mind, of one heart and soul, before the throne of God, all singing one song, all clothed in the same dress. They are a great brotherhood banded together with but one aim, one desire–and that the glory of Almighty God. The second great principle of the New Jerusalem is the awfulness of sin; over and over again we are told that out of it must be cast everything that is unclean; every sin must be banished. God Almighty is the Light of it, and He cannot look upon impurity. Once more, the third great principle is the absolute supremacy of Jesus Christ. Who is the object of worship in heaven? Who is on the throne whom all the saints and angels are worshipping and adoring? Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, the King of kings, the Lord of lords, the Alpha arid Omega, the Beginning and the End, In the New Jerusalem there is but one object of adoration–the Lord Jesus. There is but one beginning and ending, but one answer to every question–Christ. What we want is greater faith in Jesus Christ; a greater belief that God is as good as His word, and that though the world does present a very sorry appearance, and though the Church may seem to be an utter failure, still God is on His throne, and Jesus is interceding for us, and the saints and angels are on our side. But remember, we must be true to our part of the transaction; He needs our co-operation, and it is only by thus working together that we shall produce the New Jerusalem. (James Adderley, M. A.)
The first city and the last
(with Gen 4:17):–In Genesis we have the first city built by Cain, in Revelation the last city built by Christ. I wish to show how the spirit of Christ will purify and exalt city life, how it will arrest the evil of the multitude within the city walls, how it will develop the good, and bring the corporate life to a glorious perfection. It was said of Augustus that he found Rome brick and left it marble; but Christ shall work a far grander transformation, for, finding the cities of the earth cities of Cain, He shall change them into New Jerusalems, holy cities, cities of God. We must not look for the city that John saw in some future world, strange and distant; we must look for it in the purification of the present order. Now, what makes a great city a sad sight? what is the cause of its terrible and perplexing contrasts? and how will Christ cure these evils, and bring the clean thing out of the unclean?
I. The spirit of Cain was the spirit of ungodliness. It was the spirit of worldliness, it was the fastening to the earthly side of things, and the leaving out of the spiritual and Divine: it made material life a substitute for God, and in all things aimed to make man independent of God. In opposition to this Christ brings into city life the element of spirituality. Coming down out of heaven from God. It is in the recognition of the living God that Christ creates the fairer civilisation. He puts into our heart assurance of Gods existence, government, watchfulness, equity, faithfulness.
II. The spirit of Cain was the spirit of unbrotherliness. The first city was built in the spirit of a cruel egotism, built by a fratricide, and Cains red finger-marks are on the city still. The rich things of commerce are stained by extortion and selfishness–the bloody finger-marks are not always immediately visible, but they are generally there, Yes, the foundation-stone of the city was laid on the corpse of a brother, and ever since has the city been built up in the spirit of rapacity, ambition, and cruelty. And what is the outcome of this selfishness? It creates everywhere weakness and wretchedness and peril. It throws a strange black shadow on all the magnificence of civilisation. And in the end, whatever has the stain of blood on it rots and smells and perishes. The spirit of Christ is the spirit of brotherliness. There are red marks once more on the new city, but this time they are the Builders own blood, teaching us that as He laid down His life for us, so we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. Oh! what a mighty difference will the working of this spirit make in all our civilisation! How it will inspire men, soften their antagonisms, lighten their burdens, wipe away their tears, make rough places smooth, dark places bright, crooked places plain.
III. The spirit of Cain was the spirit of unrighteousness. Cain acted in untruthfulness, injustice, violence. Our great populations are full of wretchedness, because there is everywhere such lack of truth and equity and mercy. The spirit of Christ is the spirit of righteousness. Christ comes not only with the sweetness of love, but with the majesty of truth and justice. He creates, wherever He is received, purity of heart, conscientiousness, faithfulness, uprightness of spirit and action. And in this spirit of righteousness shall we build the ideal city. Some time ago, in one of the Reviews, a writer gave a picture of the London of the future, when all sanitary and political improvements shall have been perfected. No dust in the streets, no smoke in the air, no noise, no fog, spaces everywhere for flowers and sunlight, the sky above always pure, the Thames running below a tide of silver; but think of the city of the future in whose life, laws, institutions, trade, politics, pleasure the righteousness of Christ shall find full and final manifestation. Where is the poet, the painter who shall paint for us that golden city so holy and clean? It is painted for us here; it is the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven, etc. (W. L. Watkinson.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 2. And I John] The writer of this book; whether the evangelist and apostle, or John the Ephesian presbyter, has been long doubted in the Church.
New Jerusalem] See Clarke’s notes on Ga 4:24-27. This doubtless means the Christian Church in a state of great prosperity and purity; but some think eternal blessedness is intended.
Coming down from God] It is a maxim of the ancient Jews that both the tabernacle, and the temple, and Jerusalem itself, came down from heaven. And in Midrash Hanaalem, Sohar Gen. fol. 69, col. 271, Rab. Jeremias said, “The holy blessed God shall renew the world, and build Jerusalem, and shall cause it to descend from heaven.” Their opinion is, that there is a spiritual temple, a spiritual tabernacle, and a spiritual Jerusalem; and that none of these can be destroyed, because they subsist in their spiritual representatives. See Schoettgen.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
The holy city, new Jerusalem; that is, the whole chorus or number of the elect of God, answering Gods chosen people in Jerusalem.
Coming down from God out of heaven; not locally coming down, but who had their original from heaven, and were all persons of heavenly minds.
Prepared as a bride adorned for her husband; in their best robes of glory, such as brides use to wear, when on their wedding day they adorn themselves for their bridegrooms.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
2. And I John“John”is omitted in A, B, Vulgate, Syriac, Coptic, and ANDREAS;also the “I” in the Greek of these authorities isnot emphatic. The insertion of “I John” in the Greekwould somewhat interfere with the close connection which subsistsbetween “the new heaven and earth,” Re21:1, and the “new Jerusalem” in this verse.
Jerusalem . . . out ofheaven (Rev 3:12; Gal 4:26,”Jerusalem which is above”; Heb 11:10;Heb 12:22; Heb 13:14).The descent of the new Jerusalem out of heaven isplainly distinct from the earthly Jerusalem in which Israel inthe flesh shall dwell during the millennium, and follows on thecreation of the new heaven and earth. John in his Gospel alwayswrites [Greek] Hierosoluma of the old city; in theApocalypse always Hierousaleem of the heavenly city (Re3:12). Hierousaleem is a Hebrew name, the originaland holy appellation. Hierosoluma is the common Greekterm, used in a political sense. Paul observes the same distinctionwhen refuting Judaism (Ga 4:26;compare Gal 1:17; Gal 1:18;Gal 2:1; Heb 12:22),though not so in the Epistles to Romans and Corinthians [BENGEL].
bridemade up of theblessed citizens of “the holy city.” There is no longermerely a Paradise as in Eden (though there is that also, Re2:7), no longer a mere garden, but now the city of God onearth, costlier, statelier, and more glorious, but at the same timethe result of labor and pains such as had not to be expended by manin dressing the primitive garden of Eden. “The lively stones”were severally in time laboriously chiselled into shape, after thepattern of “the Chief corner-stone,” to prepare them forthe place which they shall everlastingly fill in the heavenlyJerusalem.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And I John saw the holy city,…. The same with the beloved city in Re 20:9 the church of God: sometimes the church militant is called a city, of which the saints are now fellow citizens, governed by wholesome laws, and enjoying many privileges; but here the general assembly and church of the firstborn, or all the elect of God, are intended, the whole body and society of them, being as a city, compact together; called holy, not only because set apart to holiness by God the Father, and their sins expiated by the blood of Christ, or because he is made sanctification to them, or because internally sanctified by the Spirit of God, which now is but in part; but because they will be perfectly holy in themselves, without the being of sin in them, or any spot of it on them: and John, for the more strong ascertaining the truth of this vision, expresses his name, who saw it, to whom God sent his angel, and signified to him by these Apocalyptic visions what should be hereafter; though the name is left out in the Alexandrian copy, and in the Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopic versions:
new Jerusalem; the church of God, both in the Old and New Testament, is often called Jerusalem, to which its name, which signifies the vision of peace, agrees; it was the city of the great King, whither the tribes went up to worship; it was a free city, and a fortified one: the Gospel church state in its imperfection is called the heavenly Jerusalem, and the Jerusalem above, which is free, and the mother of all; and here the church in its perfect state is called the new Jerusalem, where will be complete peace and prosperity; and which is called new, because it has its seat in the new heaven and new earth: the inhabitants of which will appear in their new and shining robes of immortality and glory; and to distinguish it from the old Jerusalem, and even from the former state of the church; for this will be “the third time” that Jerusalem will be built, as say the Jews, namely, in the time of the King Messiah r:
coming down from God out of heaven; which designs not the spiritual and heavenly original of the saints, being born from above, on which account the church is called the heavenly Jerusalem; but a local descent of all the saints with Christ from the third heaven into the air, where they will be met by living saints; and their bodies being raised and united to their souls, they will reign with Christ in the new earth: and this is
“the building which the Jews say God will prepare for the Jerusalem which is above, , “to descend into” s:”
prepared as a bride adorned for her husband; Christ is the husband, or bridegroom, and the church is his spouse, and bride; and in these characters they will both appear at this time, when the marriage between them will be consummated: and the church may be said to be prepared as such, when all the elect of God are gathered in, the number of the saints is perfected; when the good work of grace is finished in them all, and they are all arrayed in the righteousness of Christ: and to be “adorned”, when not only they are clothed with the robe of righteousness, and garments of salvation, and are beautified with the graces of the Spirit, but also with the bright robes of immortality and glory. The phrase is Jewish, and is to be read exactly as here in the book of Zohar t.
r Zohar in Gen. fol. 126. 4. s Ib. fol. 103. 4. t Zohar in Gen. fol. 53. 2.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
The holy city, new Jerusalem ( ). “The New Earth must have a new metropolis, not another Babylon, but another and greater Jerusalem” (Swete), and not the old Jerusalem which was destroyed A.D. 70. It was called the Holy City in a conventional way (Matt 4:5; Matt 27:53), but now in reality because it is new and fresh (), this heavenly Jerusalem of hope (Heb 12:22), this Jerusalem above (Ga 4:26ff.) where our real citizenship is (Php 3:20).
Coming down out of heaven from God ( ). Glorious picture caught by John and repeated from 3:12 and again in 21:10. But Charles distinguishes this new city of God from that in 21:9-22:2 because there is no tree of life in this one. But one shrinks from too much manipulation of this symbolism. It is better to see the glorious picture with John and let it tell its own story.
Made ready (). Perfect passive participle of as in 19:7. The Wife of the Lamb made herself ready in her bridal attire.
As a bride adorned ( ). Perfect passive participle of , old verb (from ornament like our cosmetics), as in 21:19. Only here the figure of bride is not the people of God as in 19:7, but the abode of the people of God (the New Jerusalem).
For her husband ( ). Dative case of personal interest.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
I John. Omit John.
New Jerusalem. Others join new with coming down, and render corning down new out of heaven.
A bride. Compare Isa 61:10; Isa 61:5.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And I John saw the holy city, New Jerusalem,” (kai ten polin ten hagian lerousalem kainen eidon) “And I (John) saw (recognized) the holy city, New Jerusalem; Isa 52:1; Heb 11:10; Heb 11:16; Heb 12:22-24, described as the Lamb’s wife, who after her marriage, Rev 19:7-9, appears to be the central place from which the Lamb’s glory and light shall shine for eternity, Eph 3:21; Rev 21:10; Rev 21:27.
2) “Coming down from God out of heaven,” (kataboinousan ek tou ouranou apo tou theou) “Coming down from (the throne of) God out of heaven.” It appears that the bride, the Lamb’s wife, and the redeemed of the ages were caught up to glory (invisible), while God created the new heaven and new earth, after melting and dissolving the former with fire, Heb 11:10; Heb 11:16; 2Pe 3:7; 2Pe 3:13; Rev 20:9.
3) “Prepared as a bride,” (hetoimasmenen hos numphen) “Which had been prepared similar to (as) a bride;” in full marital array, charm, purity, and beauty; Our Lord had promised this place, Joh 14:2-4; Abraham had looked for it, Heb 11:10; And John gazed upon it! 1Co 2:9; It was described by David, Psa 45:13-15; and by Isa 61:10.
4) “Adorned for her husband,” (kekosmemenen to andri autes) “Who had been adorned (arrayed) for her man, her husband; As she appeared at the marriage, Rev 19:7-9; 2Co 11:2; Rev 22:17; Eph 5:25-27.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(2) And I John saw the holy city . . .Better, And the holy city, new Jerusalem, I saw coming down out of the heaven from God, prepared . . . The name John is omitted in the best MSS. The new Jerusalem is more fully described later on (Rev. 21:10 et seq.). The city is also the bride (comp. Rev. 21:9-10). Both imagesthe city and the brideare familiar to the Bible student. The sacred city appears linked to God by a sacred bond. (Comp. Psa. 45:13-14; Isa. 61:10; Isa. 62:4-5; Gal. 4:26; Eph. 5:25-27.) The city-bride is now adorned for her Husband. We know what her ornaments are, now that He is about to present her to Himself a glorious Church: the meekness and gentleness of Christ, and her loving obedience to Him (1Pe. 3:4), are her jewels. She is seen, not rising from earth or sea, like the foes of righteousness (Rev. 13:1; Rev. 13:11), but coming down from heaven. The world will never evolve a golden age or ideal state. The new Jerusalem must descend from God. The true pattern, which alone will realise mans highest wishes, is the pattern in the mount of God (Act. 7:44).
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
2. And I To our seer who has been narrating the victory over Babylon, the harlot, the first thought to occur is the new Jerusalem, the bride. But after this first outburst he postpones the city to Rev 21:9; while he stops to tell us (Rev 21:3-8) something about the country.
From God Of this city the builder and maker is God.
Out of heaven Coming down from above the firmament by an opening in its vast visible concave.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband.’
See Rev 21:9-10. This descent is on the new earth, the new creation. The creation of Genesis 1 is no more, except in the sense that it has been the prototype of the new creation. The idea is that just as God created the old world and then created man to people it, so now, having created the new unpopulated earth He sends down from Heaven the city of His people (compare Heb 12:22), to the prepared place (compare Joh 14:3). And the people descend together as a city (for they were previously in Heaven – Rev 14:1-3) and are one together and form the bride. The holy city has put on her beautiful garments (Isa 52:1) and is as a bride adorned for her husband.
That Jerusalem is the bride parallels Rev 19:7 and the wording is very similar, demonstrating that the new Jerusalem is to be seen as representing the people of God. The bride was a composite figure, for she consisted of the whole people of God, and the new Jerusalem is the same, for in the end a city is its people. Compare how in Mat 8:34 ‘all the city came out to meet Jesus’ (a city ‘coming out’ is similar to a city ‘coming down’. See also Mat 11:20; Mat 12:25; Mat 21:10; Mar 1:33; Mar 6:11; Luk 4:43; Act 13:44; Act 14:21; Act 17:5; Act 17:16). Thus it is now ‘the holy city’. Previously His people were the holy sanctuary (Rev 11:1) in which God dwelt (1Co 3:16; 1Co 6:19), now they are seen as one with, and part of, the holy city wherein God will dwell (v. 3). Jerusalem is created a rejoicing and her people a joy (Isa 65:18). This is the work of the Amen (Isa 65:16), and the former troubles will be forgotten (v. 17).
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Ver. 2. The holy city ] The Church in glory, saith Diodate. The Church wayfaring and warfaring, saith Brightman, whose interpretation of this text, Nitur coniectura optabili magis quam opinabili, saith Pareus, is more to be wished than imagined. The glory of Christ’s bride is fitter to be believed than possible to be discoursed, saith Prosper. The Italians have this proverb among them, He that hath not seen Venice, believes not the bravery of it; and he that hath not lived somewhile there, understandeth it not. This is much more true of Uranople, the New Jerusalem. St John’s New Jerusalem, and Ezekiel’s city and temple, from Eze 40:1-49 to the end, are contemporary (say some), and signify one and the same thing. (Haffen refferus.)
As a bride adorned, &c. ] Bishop Ridley, the night before he suffered, invited his hostess and the rest at table to his marriage; for, said he, tomorrow I must be married. Some other martyrs went as merrily to die as ever they did to dine.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
=origin, = originator. This conception of the new Jerusalem as messiah’s bride in the latter days is an original touch, added by the prophet to the traditional Jewish material ( cf. Volz, 336 f.). In 4 Esd. 6:26 (Lat. Syr.) “the bride shall appear, even the city coming forth, and she shall be seen who is now hidden from the earth”; but this precedes the 400 years of bliss, at the close of which messiah dies. In En. xc. 28 f. a new and better house is substituted for the old, while in 4 Esd. 9 11. the mourning mother rather suddenly becomes “a city builded” with large foundations ( i.e. , Zion). These partial anticipations lend some colour to Dalman’s plea that the conception of a pre-existent heavenly Jerusalem was extremely limited in Judaism, and that John’s vision is to be isolated from the other N.T. hints (see reff.). For a fine application of the whole passage, see Ecce Homo , ch. 24. The vision conveys Christian hope and comfort in terms of a current and ancient religious tradition upon the new Jerusalem ( cf. Charles on Apoc. Bar. iv. 3). The primitive form of this conception, which lasted in various phases down to the opening of the second century, was that the earthly Jerusalem simply needed to be purified in order to become the fit and final centre of the messianic realm with its perfect communion between God and man ( cf. Isa 60 ; Isa 54:11 = Tob 13:16-17 , Ezekiel 40-48, En. x. 16 19, xxv. 1, Ps. Sol. 17:25, 33, Ap. Bar. xxix, xxxix. xl, lxxii, lxxiv, 4 Esd. 7:27 30, 12:32 34, etc.). But alongside of this, especially after the religious revival under the Maccabees, ran the feeling that the earthly Jerusalem was too stained and secular to be a sacred city; its heavenly counterpart, pure and pre-existent, must descend (so here, after En. xc. 28, 29, Ap. Bar. xxxii. 3, 4, Test. Dan 5 , etc.). In rabbinic theology, the vision of the heavenly Jerusalem was taken from Adam after his lapse, but shown as a special favour to Abraham, Jacob and Moses ( cf. Ap. Bar. iv). The Christian prophet John not only sees it but sees it realised among Christian people a brave and significant word of prophecy, in view of his age and surroundings.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
John. The texts omit.
new Jerusalem. See Rev 3:12. The city “above” (Gal 1:4, Gal 1:26); “which hath the foundations” (Heb 11:10); “the heavenly Jerusalem” (Heb 12:22).
bride. Greek. numphe. See v. 9; Rev 22:17, and App-197.
husband. App-123.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Rev 21:2. ) It is not without reason that John always writes in his Gospel , of the old city; in the Apocalypse always , of the heavenly city. is a Hebrew name, the original and more holy one: , afterwards in ordinary use, is a Greek name, and rather used in a political sense. St Paul observes the same difference, when refuting Judaism, Gal 4:26 (comp. the same Epistle, Rev 1:17-18, Rev 2:1); Heb 12:22, although at other times he uses them indiscriminately, and says to the Romans and Corinthians, for the sake of [dignity] and to win their favour, .-, I saw) The more recent Editions have incorrectly introduced the name of John in this verse.[224] It was the beginning of an ecclesiastical section [used in the services of the Church]; but the text itself most closely connects together the new heaven, the new earth, and the new Jerusalem. The new city has no connection with the millennium, as Lange and some others judge, Comm. Apoc. f. 241, etc.; but it belongs to the state of perfect renovation and eternity, as is shown by the series of visions, the magnificence of the description, and the opposition to the second death: ch. Rev 20:11-12, Rev 21:1-2; Rev 21:5; Rev 21:8-9, Rev 22:5.-, coming down) This may be taken in vision, respecting the act of descending: in the reality signified, without reference to that act, it may be understood of the state of the Divine to men. For in Topographies, words which convey the idea of motion, often signify a condition, and among them this very verb of descending: Psa 104:8; Jos 15:3; Jos 15:10, etc. The whole city is inclusive and included; in so far as it includes the inhabitants, it descends.
[224] ABh Iren. and best MSS. of Vulg. have not , which Rec. Text has inserted without good authority.-E.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
I: Rev 1:1, Rev 1:4, Rev 1:9
the holy: Rev 3:12, Psa 48:1-3, Psa 87:3, Isa 1:21, Isa 52:1, Jer 31:23, Heb 11:10, Heb 12:22, Heb 13:14
coming: Rev 21:10, Gal 4:25, Gal 4:26
as: Rev 19:7, Rev 19:8, Psa 45:9-14, Isa 54:5, Isa 61:10, Isa 62:4, Joh 3:29, 2Co 11:2, Eph 5:25-27, Eph 5:30-32
Reciprocal: Neh 11:18 – the holy Psa 46:4 – city Psa 68:16 – the hill Psa 84:1 – How Psa 107:7 – that they Son 2:16 – beloved Son 4:7 – General Son 4:9 – my spouse Son 6:3 – my beloved’s Son 6:4 – comely Isa 48:2 – they call Isa 49:18 – as a bride Isa 65:11 – my holy Jer 2:32 – a maid Jer 33:2 – the maker Eze 16:10 – clothed Eze 43:7 – where I Dan 9:20 – for Hos 2:19 – And I will Mat 5:35 – the city Mat 9:15 – Can Mat 25:1 – the bridegroom Mat 27:53 – holy Joh 14:2 – I go Eph 5:32 – speak Rev 11:2 – and the Rev 21:9 – the Lamb’s Rev 22:17 – the bride Rev 22:19 – and out
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Rev 21:2. Holy city new Jerusalem means the church that is to be united at the last day in the final marriage of Christ as the bridegroom. (See the comments at Rev 19:7.) Paul speaks of the church as the “heavenly Jerusalem” in Heb 12:22, and he alsoHeb 7:5 oHeb 9:23 thHeb 12:22 at is above and is free and “the mother of us all” (Gal 4:26). Prepared refers to the condition a bride brings to herself in view of her approaching marriage.
Comments by Foy E. Wallace
Verse 2.
2. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepaRev 21:3 bride adorned for her husband—Rev 21:2.
The old Jerusalem, the harlot and the Babylon of Revelation had fallen–the Jerusalem of Judaism.
Here the Jerusalem of Gal 4:26 and Heb 12:22 were envision by the Seer as the bride of Christ. It was a vision of the fall of the old and the triumph of the new. The fact that this new Jerusalem was seen coming down from God out of heaven is the proof that it was not in reference to or descriptive of the eternal home; but rather that God was envisioned as presenting to the new earth what he had preserved from the tribulation of the old, “for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away.”
In the period of persecution the vision was of the militant church passing through tribulation; but that scene was completed and here the vision was of the triumphant church coming out of tribulation into the victory of the cause of her Christ, the ConquerRev 21:3 r enemies. The new Jerusalem was described as the beautified Woman, who had once fled inRev 19:1 ilderness as a persecuted church, but was now seen coming from God her Preserver wondrously clothed, resplendently attired, richly adorned, gloriously displayed–triumphantly deEph 5:5 g out of heaven. The persecuted Woman had fled to “the place pHeb 1:8 of God” for her refuge, protection and preservation, but was Act 20:28 sioned as having returned and in the ultimate descriptive phrases of victory and triumph she was presented to “the new heaven and the new earth” as the glorious Bride of the Lamb–the picture of the Conquering Christ and his Victorious Church.
The new dwelling place for the new Jerusalem had been renovated and purged from all heathen domination. The old Jerusalem with its old system Heb 8:1-13 had been typical of the city of God; but its sanctuary was cleansed and it was to be no longer earthly, but heavenly; no longer temporal but spiritual. (Heb 7:5; Heb 9:23; Heb 12:22) The new Jerusalem on a spiritually or figuratively renovated earth was seen as the heavenly community of tExo 40:34-38 for all nations of men. It was the vision of the pure Eph 2:22 ride descending from the high realm of holiness in contrast with the fallen harlot city.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rev 21:2. The Apostle beholds the metropolis of the renovated world under the figure of that metropolis which was so intimately associated with the memories and aspirations of the people of God, a New Jerusalem. Her newness will be afterwards more particularly described, but even now we are told enough to convey to us a lofty idea of her grandeur and beauty. She comes down out of heaven, from God, and she is prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. Is there not a reminiscence in the word prepared of that great promise in Joh 14:3 which the apostle who saw this vision was to record? The Bridegroom is now the Husband (comp. wife in Rev 21:9).
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
The devil and his forces have done all they could to break up this union, but the church is now seen separated from sin and beautifully dressed for her husband. ( Eph 5:25-27 ) New Jerusalem is a title for the church. ( Gal 4:26 ; Heb 12:22 ) Perhaps she is let down out of heaven because she is specially prepared of God.
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
Verse 2
All the ideas of earthly greatness and magnificence entertained by the Jews were centred in the city of Jerusalem. A new Jerusalem was therefore an appropriate symbol under which to convey a high conception of the splendors of the heavenly state.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
21:2 {2} And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
(2) The state of this glorious Church is first described generally to Rev 21:3-8 , and then specially and by parts, in the verses following. The general description consists in a vision shown afar off, Rev 21:2 and in speech spoken from heaven. In the general these things are common, that the Church is holy, new, the workmanship of God, heavenly, most glorious, the spouse of Christ, and partaker of his glory in this verse.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
2. John’s first vision of the New Jerusalem 21:2-8
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
In the same vision, John next saw a city descending out of heaven from God (cf. Rev 21:10; Rev 3:12; Heb 11:13-16). It was holy in contrast to the former Jerusalem (cf. Rev 11:8; Isa 52:1; Mat 4:5; Mat 27:53). As the old Jerusalem will be Jesus Christ’s capital during the Millennium, so the New Jerusalem will be His capital from then on. In the bride-husband simile, the city is the bride, and Christ is the husband (Rev 21:9-10; cf. Rev 3:12). Obviously some symbolism is present in the descriptions of the New Jerusalem.
"Just as the four actual kingdoms of Daniel 2, 7 do not literally correspond to the imagery that portrays them, so the New Jerusalem does not literally correspond to the imagery of Revelation 21-22. Though it is an actual literal city, its glory will far surpass the language that John uses to portray it. John’s language is an attempt to describe what is in one sense indescribable." [Note: David L. Turner, "The New Jerusalem in Revelation 21:1-22:5," in Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church, p. 276.]
The use of the bride figure to describe the New Jerusalem should not lead us to conclude that the New Jerusalem is identical with the church. Some interpreters have equated the two. [Note: E.g., Lilje, p. 259.] The bride figure elsewhere describes the church (e.g., Rev 19:7; 2Co 11:2), but here the city is the bride. The bride figure describes different entities in intimate relationship to Christ. The Old Testament also used the bride as a figure to describe Israel’s relationship to God (Isa 62:5; Jer 2:2; Jer 3:20; Eze 16:8; Hos 2:19-20). This does not mean that Israel, the church, and the New Jerusalem are three names of the same entity. However, this bride of Christ, the New Jerusalem, now evidently encompasses two previous brides of Christ: Israel and the church. The city is the corporate identity of those who reside in it. Like Babylon, it is a real city, but it also represents the people who live there, which in this case include old covenant and new covenant believers. It is the place that Jesus Christ went to the Cross to prepare for His disciples (Joh 14:2). Like the name "Babylon," "New Jerusalem" probably represents both a real city and what Jerusalem has represented throughout history.
"Revelation as a whole may be characterized as A Tale of Two Cities, with the sub-title, The Harlot and the Bride." [Note: Beasley-Murray, p. 315.]
There have been several explanations of the relationship of the New Jerusalem to the new earth. It may be that John saw as a city what he had formerly seen as a new heaven and earth. In other words, the New Jerusalem and the new heaven and earth may be two different figures describing the eternal state. Thus the eternal dwelling place of believers will be a completely new creation by God that John saw in his visions first as a new world and then as a new city.
Alternatively the New Jerusalem could be a satellite above the new earth. Some hold that the New Jerusalem will be a satellite of the present earth during the Millennium, and when God creates the new earth it will descend out of heaven and rest on the surface of the new earth. [Note: Pentecost, Things to . . ., p. 580.] Some believe that the New Jerusalem will be within the new earth. [Note: McGee, 5:1068-72.] The text does not say the New Jerusalem will come down to the new earth, only that John saw it coming down out of heaven from God (cf. Rev 21:10).