Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Jeremiah 35:8

Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab the son of Rechab our father in all that he hath charged us, to drink no wine all our days, we, our wives, our sons, nor our daughters;

Our father – Not merely our ancestor, but the founder of our institutions.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 8. Thus have we obeyed the voice] We have considered these precepts so very reasonable, so very useful, so conducive to the health of both body and mind, and sanctioned by such a respectable antiquity that we scrupulously and religiously observe them.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

8. all that he . . . charged us . .. all our days, we . . . wives . . . sons . . . daughtersunreservedobedience in all particulars, at all times, and on the part of all,without exception: in these respects Israel’s obedience to God waswanting. Contrast 1Sa 15:20;1Sa 15:21; Psa 78:34-37;Psa 78:41; Psa 78:56;Psa 78:57.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab the son of Rechab our father,…. The above was the charge he gave them; and this, in every article of it, they had carefully and constantly kept, though it had been for the space of three hundred years, or thereabout; as follows:

in all he hath charged us, to drink no wine all our days, we, our wives, our sons, nor our daughters; which was the first of the precepts he gave them: and which they were now tempted to disregard, but were resolved to observe it, as they had hitherto done. The rest of the articles follow.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Jeremiah explains at large what might have been expressed in few words, in order to amplify the constancy of the Rechabites. For one may obey his father, and yet be not so fixed in his purpose, but that he might on some slight occasion fail in his duty. Jeremiah here shews that such was the prompt perseverance of the Rechabites, that they could not be enticed by having wine set before them; but that as though no temptation had been presented to them, they kept the commandment of their father, who, at the same time, had been dead, as it has already appeared, some ages before.

They then said, that they hearkened to the voice of Jonabab the son of Rechab, their father; and also added, according to all the things which he has commanded us tle again relates what Jonadab had commanded, and to this belongs the sentence, According to all things, etc. For had he ordered them only to be abstemious, to obey would not have been difficult or hard; he designed to bind them to a wandering life, that they might be covered only by tents, and that they might not possess anything. As then Jonadab did not in one thing only try the obedience of his family, it appears more clearly how great was their promptitude and perseverance in obeying.

They then said, first, that they were not to drink wine; and also added, all their days We indeed know that the Nazarites were forbidden to drink wine, but it was only for a time, until they had performed their vow; we also know, that when the priest was discharging his duty, he was not allowed, for that time, to take wine. But afterwards the priests as well as the Nazarites, resumed their common mode of living. But to taste no wine throughout life was a thing far more difficult. The Prophet, no doubt, detailed these particulars, that he might load the Jews with greater disgrace, who, in a matter the most just, and by no means hard, were not, as we shall see, obedient to God. They said, We, our wives, our sons, our daughters, as though they had said, “This precept has ever been observed in our family; and what has been delivered to us, by our fathers, we have followed to this day, as also our fathers, who obeyed the command of a dead man, because his will had been explained to them.”

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

Jer 35:8 Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab the son of Rechab our father in all that he hath charged us, to drink no wine all our days, we, our wives, our sons, nor our daughters;

Ver. 8. Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab. ] Obedience to parents, in things not unlawful, is very commendable. Aristotle saith, a It is not good for a man to dissent from the gods, from his father, and from his teacher. We read of a king of Poland who carried the picture of his father in a plate of gold about his neck, and when he was going about any great business, he would kiss that picture and say, God grant I may observe my father’s charge, and do nothing unworthy of him, &c.

We, our wives, our sons, and our daughters. ] As themselves were obedient to their father, so had they their children obedient to them, whereas ill children are punished in their posterity. One complained that never father had so undutiful a child as he had. Yes, said his son, with less grace than truth, my grandfather had. b

a M , . – Ar. Rhet.

b Fuller’s Holy State.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

Pro 1:8, Pro 1:9, Pro 4:1, Pro 4:2, Pro 4:10, Pro 6:20, Pro 13:1, Col 3:20

Reciprocal: 2Ki 10:15 – Jehonadab Est 1:8 – none did compel Jer 35:2 – the house Jer 35:10 – General

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Jer 35:8-9, The only reason given by these people for their conduct was that they obeyed the voice of their father. That is the principle of obedience that should be the motive of all who are under authority. We may not understand why God has given certain commands, but if we respect His au-thority we will obey his orders.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Jer 35:8-11. Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab our father We have conformed ourselves to his injunctions, and governed our lives by them, during the space of nearly three hundred years. But when Nebuchadrezzar came, &c., we said, Come, let us go to Jerusalem The Rechabites appear to have retired within the walls of Jerusalem upon the hostile approach of Nebuchadnezzar and his army, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim. Calmet, indeed, supposes it was not till the latter end of Jehoiakims reign that the Rechabites were driven into the city for shelter, grounding his opinion upon its being said in this verse, that they entered it for fear of the army of the Chaldeans, and of the army of the Syrians, and comparing this with 2Ki 24:2, where the Lord is said to have sent bands of the Chaldees, and bands of the Syrians, against Judah to destroy it. But this reasoning, says Blaney, will not hold, for, 1st, Nebuchadnezzar might have been, and most probably was, joined by the Syrians in his first expedition against Jerusalem, after the defeat of the Egyptians at Carchemish, which brought on the submission of Syria. And, 2d, Nebuchadnezzar does not appear to have come in person a second time, at least till after Jehoiakim was taken prisoner, and his generals had closely invested Jerusalem. So we dwell at Jerusalem Having retired to Jerusalem upon the Chaldean invasion, they were forced to continue there during the siege of the place. In such an extraordinary case, they did not think themselves obliged to a strict observance of the injunction of Jonadab respecting dwelling in tents, because all human laws admit of an equitable construction, and may be superseded in cases of necessity, or when the observance of them is attended with such great inconveniences as the lawgiver himself, if he could have foreseen them, would probably have excepted.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

The Rechabites explained that they had obeyed their ancestor’s commands faithfully since the time he gave them (cf. Exo 20:12). For over 200 years they had been faithful and obedient (cf. 2Ki 10:15-27).

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)